长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (10): 2339-2347.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201810019

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

 

  

近期长江河口横沙通道冲淤变化与微地貌特征

 

吴帅虎1,2,3,程和琴2*,郑树伟4   

  1.  

    1. 安阳师范学院资源环境与旅游学院,河南 安阳 455000;2.华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室,上海 2000623.清华大学水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 1000844.山东师范大学地理与环境学院,山东 济南 250358

  • 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-11-16

 

Recent Morphological Changes and Microtopography Features in the Hengsha Passage of the Yangtze River Estuary

 

WU Shuaihu1,2,3, CHENG Heqin2, ZHENG Shuwei4   

  1.  

    (1. School of Resources Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 4550000, China;2. State Key Laboratary of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; 3.State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering Fsinghua University Beijing 10084, China;4.College of Geography and Environment,Shandong Normal University,Shandong 250358,China)

  • Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-11-16

摘要:  

201521~7日利用多波束测深系统对长江口横沙通道河槽进行走航测量,结合人类活动强干扰下的海图水深数据及河槽表层沉积物资料分析近期长江河口横沙通道河槽冲淤变化与微地貌特征,探讨河槽冲淤演变和床面微地貌之间的相关性以及河口河槽冲淤演变过程和微地貌特征对人类活动的响应。结果显示:近年来横沙通道河槽持续受到冲刷,2002~2013年泥沙净冲刷量为0.86 × 108m3,平均每年冲刷0.08 × 108m3,其原因可能与三峡蓄水工程、北槽深水航道治理工程和北港青草沙水库工程的实施有关。而横沙通道的河床冲刷对圆圆沙航槽和北槽航道的泥沙回淤具有一定的贡献;其底床上除发育平滑床底外,还广泛发育凹坑和冲刷痕等侵蚀性微地貌,且河槽受到冲刷导致底沙推移质运动增强,促进了沙波微地貌的发育。

Abstract:  

Bedforms were observed in February 2015 with the acoustic multibeam bathymetric. Chart data and surface sediment samples were collected. Based on these data, the recent morphological changes and microtopography features in the Hengsha Passage of the Yangtze River Estuary were studied in this paper. The correlation between the morphological changes and microtopography in the Hengsha Passage was explored in this paper, and the response of the morphological changes and bedforms of the channel beds to the human activities was also explored. Results showed the channel of Hengsha Passage experienced significant erosion because the construction of Three Gorge Dam, the Qingcaosha Reservoir project and the Deepening Waterway Project may have indirectly affected the morphology of the Hengsha Passage. From 2002 to 2013, net volume loss and average annual net volume loss reached 0.86 × 108 m3 and 0.08 × 108 m3 yr-1 in the Hengsha Passage, respectively. A large amount of the eroded sediment from the south entrance of the Hengsha Passage was trapped, resulting in substantial accretion in the Yuanyuansha Waterway and the upper reach of the North Passage. In addition to smooth bed floors, there were erosive microtopography in the Hengsha Passage, such as hollow and scour mark etc.. Due to the channel experienced erosion will lead to enhanced of bed load movement, which can promote the development of dunes. Consequently, there was a large area of dunes developed in the Hengsha Passage.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘蓓蓓, 李凤英, 俞钦钦, 于洋, 毕军. 长江三角洲城市间环境公平性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1093 .
[2] 许妍, 高俊峰, 黄佳聪. 太湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 646 .
[3] 伍学进, 曾菊新. 试论宜居性城市绿地的规划与建设[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 28 .
[4] 张天宇, 李永华, 程炳岩, 孙杰, 许崇海. 三峡库区汛期极端降水非均匀性特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(3): 298 .
[5] 许朗|黄莺|刘爱军. 基于主成分分析的江苏省水资源承载力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1468 .
[6] 赵家虎| 高俊峰| 刘聚涛| 许妍. 应用MODIS监测太湖蓝藻水华时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1475 .
[7] 杨本俊|杨浩|陈劲松|丁兆运|王小雷. 南京地区7Be沉降特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1376 .
[8] 姚芳芳 |冯丽丽 |杨颂宇 |王希. 亚热带常见树种幼苗对酸雨的生理响应及敏感性综合评判[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(02): 200 .
[9] 李 雷 | 危起伟 | 吴金明 | 杜 浩 | 谢 晓. 长江宜宾江段渔业资源现状调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(011): 1449 .
[10] 许 杨,杨宏青,陈正洪,成 驰. 湖北省丘陵山区风能资源特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 937 .