长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (12): 2867-2877.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201812023

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

清代1644~1911年期间珠江流域旱涝灾害时空特征分析

鲁  颖,毕硕本,刘爱利,赵  峰,孙  力   

  1. (南京信息工程大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210044)
  • 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-29

Analysis on the Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Drought and Flood Disasters in the Pearl River Basin During 1644-1911 years

LU Ying, BI Shuo-ben, LIU Ai-li, ZHAO Feng, SUN li   

  1. (School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044,China)
  • Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-29

摘要: 通过收集和整理1644~1911年珠江流域旱涝灾害历史文献资料,利用受灾县次划分旱涝等级法重建268a来的旱涝等级序列。并运用滑动平均、累积距平、EEMD、IDW等方法分析旱涝序列的时空特征。结果表明:清代1644~1911年珠江流域旱涝灾害频发,且涝灾的频次略多于旱灾,可以将1644~1911年珠江流域旱涝灾害划分为3个偏旱期和2个偏涝期,旱涝变化存在年际(准2 a、准5 a)、年代际(准10 a、准24 a和准54 a)和准世纪际(准134 a)上的3类变化周期。清代珠江流域旱涝灾害的受灾县次比在空间上存在明显的差异性,总体上洪涝灾害多于干旱灾害。珠江流域各府(州)的干旱灾害空间分布不均匀,整体上由东向西递减,洪涝灾害的频次空间分布上具有区域相连性,主要集中广东、江西两省以及云南省中部地区。

Abstract: Through the collection and collation of the historical literature on drought and flood disasters in the Pearl River Basin from 1644-1911, the drought and flood level sequence of 268 a was reconstructed by the affected county. The temporal and spatial characteristics of the drought and flood sequence were analyzed by means of sliding average, cumulative anomaly, EEMD and IDW. The results show that the droughts and floods in the Pearl River Basin were frequent in the Qing Dynasty from 1644-1911, and the frequency of disasters was slightly more than that of droughts. The droughts and floods in the Pearl River Basin from 1644 to 1911 can be divided into three drought periods and two hemiplegia periods: 2 a and 5 a for the interannual change, 10 a and 24 a for the interdecadal change, as long as 134 a for the century change. In the Qing Dynasty, the flood-stricken disasters in the Pearl River Basin have obvious differences in spatial ratios, and overall flood disasters are more than drought disasters. The spatial distribution of drought disasters in the Pearl River Basin is uneven, and the overall decline from east to west. The frequency distribution of flood disasters is regionally connected, mainly in Guangdong, Jiangxi and central Yunnan.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胥勤勉,杨达源,董 杰,周 彬. 滇池水环境治理的“调水”“活水”工程[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 116 -119 .
[2] 梁 彬,邓振平,梁小平,朱明秋,关碧珠,周 密. 湘西大龙洞岩溶流域生态环境分析与治理对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 764 -769 .
[3] 刘 伟. 长江经济带区域经济差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 131 -135 .
[4] 张利平, 夏军, 胡志芳. 中国水资源状况与水资源安全问题分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 116 .
[5] 钱建平,周 勇,杨信廷. 基于遥感和信息熵的城乡结合部范围界定——以荆州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 451 .
[6] 任晓冬, 黄明杰. 赤水河流域产业状况与综合流域管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 97 .
[7] 陈沈良,严肃庄,李玉中. 长江口及其邻近海域表层沉积物分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 152 .
[8] 杨志荣 靳相木. 基于面板数据的土地投入对经济增长的影响-以浙江省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 409 .
[9] 王玉, 贾晓波, 张文广, 方淑波, 姚懿函, 安树青. 江苏海岸带土地利用变化及驱动力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 7 .
[10] 郭跃, 程晓昀, 朱芳, 姜瑞华. 基于生态足迹的江苏省生态安全动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1327 .