长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (3): 758-766.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202003022

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

“稻虾共养”生态农业模式的化肥减量效应研究——基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的估计

杨彩艳, 齐振宏*, 黄炜虹, 叶孙红   

  1. (华中农业大学经济管理学院/湖北农村发展研究中心/华中农业大学双水双绿研究院,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-03-20

Study on the Effect of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction in the “Shrimp and Shrimp Co-cultivation” Ecological Agriculture Model:Estimation Based on Propensity Score Matching (PSM)

YANG Cai-yan,QI Zhen-hong,HUANG Wei-hong,YE Sun-hong   

  1. (School of Economics and Management/ Hubei Rural Development Research Center/Institute of “ShuangshuiShuanglü”, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-03-20

摘要: 摘要: 为应对化肥施用量居高不下引发的农业面源污染,长江中下游地区稻虾共养模式应运而生。基于课题组于2018年7~8月在江苏、湖北两省获取的509份样本农户数据,利用倾向得分匹配法(PSM),探讨稻虾共养模式的化肥减量效应是否存在及效应大小。结果表明:(1)采纳稻虾共养模式的农户确实存在显著的化肥减量效应,平均为其减少716.895元/ha,这为政府试图通过推广稻虾共养模式减少农业面源污染的合理性提供了佐证;(2)经过PSM方法处理后采纳稻虾共养模式农户的平均处理效应为-662.364,进一步证实稻虾共养模式的化肥减量效应存在且显著,而OLS模型回归高估了其化肥减量效应。基于此,我们认为稻虾共养模式应得到重点推广,并积极发展村庄中的能人以加强其带头示范作用。

Abstract: Abstract:In order to cope with the agricultural non-point source pollution caused by the high application rate of chemical fertilizers, the rice-shrimp co-cultivation model in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River came into being. Based on the data of 509 sample households obtained by the research team in Jiangsu and Hubei provinces from July to August 2018, the propensity score matching method (PSM) was used to explore the existence and effect of fertilizer reduction effect of rice-shrimp co-cultivation model. The conclusions of the study show that: (1) Farmers adopting the rice-shrimp co-feeding model do have significant fertilizer reduction effects, with an average reduction of 716.895 yuan/ha, which is the government’s attempt to reduce agricultural non-point source pollution by promoting the rice-shrimp co-feeding model. Rationality provides evidence; (2) The average treatment effect of fertlizer application farmers adopting the rice-shrimp co-feeding model after treatment with PSM method is -662.364, further confirming that the fertilizer reduction effect of rice-shrimp co-feeding mode exists and is significant, while the OLS model returns high. Estimated its fertilizer reduction effect. Based on this, this paper believes that the rice-shrimp co-feeding model should be promoted and actively developed in the village to strengthen its leading role.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[2] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[3] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[4] 刘传江,朱劲松. 三峡库区土地资源承载力现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 522 .
[5] 龙开胜, 陈利根, 李明艳. 工业化、城市化对耕地数量变化影响差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 579 .
[6] 班军梅,缪启龙,李 雄. 西南地区近50年来气温变化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 346 -351 .
[7] 胡鹤鸣,陈永灿,李玲,曾成杰. 旋转水射流冲击压强的实验分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 42 -47 .
[8] 胡明秀, 胡 辉, 王立兵. 武汉市工业“三废”污染状况计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 470 -474 .
[9] 谭支良,王久荣,潘亚飞,汤少勋,单计光,黄瑞林. 洞庭湖退田还湖区畜牧业资源与环境评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 327 -332 .
[10] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .