长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (3): 554-564.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202103004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

都市圈内核体系的综合比较研究 ——以长江中游城市群三大都市圈为例

魏国恩1,3,孙平军2,张振克1,3*   

  1. (1.南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,江苏 南京,210023;2.西南大学地理科学学院,重庆,400700;3.南京大学非洲研究所,江苏 南京,210023)
  • 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-04-07

A Comprehensive and Comparative Study on the Core System of Metropolitan Area: Taking the Three Metropolitan Area of the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River as An Example

WEI Guo-en 1,3,SUN Ping-jun 2,ZHANG Zhen-ke 1,3   

  1. (1. School of Geography and Oceanography, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023,China;2.School of Geography, Southwest University, Chongqing 400700,China;3. Institute of Africa, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023,China)
  • Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-04-07

摘要: 都市圈是推进新型城镇化的新形态,也是实现区域经济发展的基本单元,这项研究明确了区域空间发展“点-区-群”过程中,城镇综合竞争力、空间联系强度、要素区际流动在都市圈内核体系的关键性作用,通过都市圈的综合对比,为优化区域协调发展新机制、适应都市圈提质增效的新要求提供新的借鉴。通过结合城镇综合竞争力模型、改进的空间联系模型、要素流强度模型等方法集成,分析2016年长江中游城市群中长沙都市圈、武汉都市圈、南昌都市圈在城镇综合竞争力、空间结构、城镇职能分工体系3个维度的对比差异。结果表明:(1)综合竞争力研究显示,各都市圈综合竞争力具有显著的空间非均衡分布特性,长沙都市圈呈东西轴带发展,武汉都市圈的中心-外围城镇差异显著,南昌都市圈缺乏强引领能力的高值发展中心;(2)长沙都市圈形成中心-外围的圈层式空间结构形态,武汉都市圈形成多中心组团式空间结构形态,南昌都市圈呈现出昌九“双星”式空间结构形态,都市圈在中心城市指向性、空间结构形态的显著差异,与城镇扩张政策、城镇发展差距及现代交通运输线路的网络化等因素相关联;(3)长沙都市圈内部城镇的要素配置层次分明,具有完善的要素流职能分工体系,武汉都市圈的交通流与经济流位序匹配程度较差,南昌都市圈缺乏完善的经济流、交通流职能分工体系;(4)在讨论分析中为各都市圈指出了完善资源共享和要素传递通道,优化城镇分工协作机制,促进现代交通网络体系发展等针对性发展思路。

Abstract: The metropolitan area is a new form of promoting new urbanization, and it is also the basic unit to realize the regional economic development. This study clarifies the key role of the comprehensive competitiveness of cities and towns, the intensity of spatial connection and the inter-regional flow of elements in the core system of the metropolitan area in the process of regional spatial development. Through the comprehensive comparison of the metropolitan area, in order to optimize the new mechanism of regional coordinated development, To meet the new requirements of improving quality and increasing efficiency in metropolitan area to provide new reference. Combined with the comprehensive competitiveness model of cities and towns, the improved spatial relationship model and the factor flow intensity model, this paper analyzes the Changsha metropolitan area and Wuhan metropolitan area in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in 2016. The comparative differences of Nanchang metropolitan area in three dimensions: urban comprehensive competitiveness, spatial structure and urban function division system. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the research on comprehensive competitiveness of each metropolitan area shows that the comprehensive competitiveness of each metropolitan area has significant spatial disequilibrium distribution characteristics, Changsha metropolitan area is developed in the east-west axis zone, the difference between the center and the peripheral towns of Wuhan metropolitan area is significant, and the Nanchang metropolitan area lacks a high value development center with strong leading ability; (2) Changsha metropolitan area forms the circular spatial structure form from the center to the periphery, Wuhan metropolitan area forms the multi-center group spatial structure form, Nanchang metropolitan area presents the Changjiu “double star” spatial structure form. The urban circle has a significant difference in the directivity and spatial structure of the central city, and is associated with the factors such as the urban expansion policy, the urban development gap and the network of the modern transportation line. With the perfect function division system of element flow, the matching degree between traffic flow and economic flow in Wuhan city circle is poor, and the urban circle of Nanchang lacks perfect economic flow and traffic flow function division system; (4) In the discussion and analysis, the city circle points out the perfect resource sharing and the element transfer channel, the construction of the urban economic cooperation mechanism, the promotion of the development of the modern transportation network system, etc. Development ideas.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 沈德福,史学正,吕成文,于东升. 江苏沿江地区土壤肥力空间分布及其区域对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 316 -321 .
[2] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[3] 梅 艳, 刘友兆, 梁流涛. 基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 341 .
[4] 李加林,许继琴,童亿勤,杨晓平,张殿发. 杭州湾南岸滨海平原土地利用/覆被空间格局变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 709 -713 .
[5] 段学军, 陈 雯. 省域空间开发功能区划方法探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 540 -545 .
[6] 姜达炳,樊 丹,甘小泽,张光远. 运用生物埂治理三峡库区坡耕地水土流失技术研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 163 -167 .
[7] 戴润泉,臧小平,邱光胜. 三峡水库蓄水前库区水质状况研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 124 -127 .
[8] 胡明秀, 胡 辉, 王立兵. 武汉市工业“三废”污染状况计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 470 -474 .
[9] 应 铭,李九发,万新宁,沈焕庭. 长江大通站输沙量时间序列分析研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 81 -87 .
[10] 梁仁君, 林振山, 陈玲玲. 我国水资源需求量动力学预测及对策建议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 704 -708 .