长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (3): 745-757.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202103021

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于RSEI的地震区生态环境质量恢复研究 ——以汶川县为例

潘洪义,李加安,张琴   

  1. (四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院/西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610068)
  • 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-04-07

Study on Restoration of Ecological Environment Quality in Earthquake Area Based on RSEI: A Case Study of Wenchuan County

PANG Hong-yi,LI Jia-an,ZHANG Qin   

  1. (Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest,Ministry of Education, Sichuan Normal University Geography and Resources Science College,Chengdu 610068,China)
  • Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-04-07

摘要: “5·12”地震对汶川县的生态环境造成了巨大破坏,评价生态环境质量的恢复程度是汶川县灾后重建的一项重要基础工作。基于TM和OLI数据,利用ENVI平台的主成分分析技术,计算出研究区3个时期的遥感生态指数(RSEI),用于分析2003~2017年研究区的生态环境质量变化及恢复情况。结果表明:(1)2003~2017年,汶川县的生态环境质量以中等及以上为主,3个时期中等及以上等级所占比例分别为90.21%、82.01%、94.65%;(2)3个时期的RSEI指数的均值分别为0.627、0.617、0.716,生态环境质量经历了未恢复到恢复提升的过程,且研究末期的生态环境质量超过研究初期。(3)2003~2017年,汶川县生态环境质量中的较差、中、良这3个等级的面积转移明显,差和优两个等级变化不大。T1时间段,中等和良等向较低等级转移;T2时间段,较差、中、良等均向较高等级转移;T3时间段,除优等以外,其余等级均主要向较高等级转移。(4)海拔1 498~4 466 m和坡度15°~63°之间,是生态环境质量恢复最明显的区域。

Abstract: The “5·12” earthquake has caused great damage to the ecological environment of Wenchuan County. Quick and effective assessment of the ecological environment quality in the earthquake-stricken areas is an important basic work for post-disaster reconstruction. Based on TM and OLI data and principal component analysis technology of ENVI platform, the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) of three periods in the study area is obtained, which can be used to analyze the changes and restoration of the ecological environment quality in the study area from 2003 to 2017. The results showed that: (1) From 2003 to 2017, the ecological environment quality of Wenchuan County was mainly moderate or above, and the proportion of moderate or above grade was 90.21%, 82.01% and 94.65% respectively in the three periods. (2) The average RSEI index of the three periods was 0.627, 0.617 and 0.716 respectively, so the ecological environment quality experienced the process of no recovery to recovery and improvement, and the ecological environment quality at the end of the study exceeded the beginning of the study. (3) From 2003 to 2017, the area transfer of the three grades of poor, moderate and good in the ecological environment quality of Wenchuan County was obvious, while the two grades of bad and high did not change much. In T1 period, moderate and good grade were transferred to lower grade; in T2 period, poor, moderate and good grade were transferred to higher grade; in T3 period, except high grade, the other grades were mainly transferred to higher grade. (4) In the area between 1 498-4 466 meters above sea level and 15-63 degrees of slope, the recovery of ecological environment quality is the most obvious.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗友进, 韩国辉, 余端, 李燕, 廖敦秀, 谢永红, 魏朝富. 三峡库区土壤重金属污染评价及其来源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1800 .
[2] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[3] 冯凡, 赵中华, 陈晨, 田园, 郦倩玉, 龚雄虎, 叶晨昊. 铜绿微囊藻对有机毒物菲的生理生态响应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2031 -2041 .
[4] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[5] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[6] 舒旺, 王鹏, 肖汉玉, 刘君政, 赵君, 余小芳. 鄱阳湖流域乐安河水化学特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 681 -690 .
[7] 盖豪, 颜廷武, 何可, 张俊飚, . 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂3省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2141 -2153 .
[8] 张媛媛, 袁奋强, 刘东皇, 陈利馥. 产业生态化水平的测度及其影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(10): 2331 -2339 .
[9] 张 晖, 吴 霜, 张燕媛, 虞 祎. 流域生态补偿政策对受偿地区经济增长的影响研究——以安徽省黄山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(12): 2848 -2856 .
[10] 邓 伟, 周 渝, 张 勇, 孙 荣. 重庆市生态保护红线区生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其驱动[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(1): 79 -89 .