长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (11): 2514-2525.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202211016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型喀斯特小流域石灰土和黄壤硫同位素分布特征及其影响因素

张伟1,2,张丽丽3,4   

  1. (1.天津师范大学水资源与水环境重点实验室,天津 300387;2.天津师范大学地理与环境科学学院,天津 300387;3. 贵州师范学院地理与资源学院,贵州 贵阳550018;4. 贵州省流域地理国情监测重点实验室,贵州 贵阳 550018) 
  • 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-12-26

Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Sulfur Isotope Distribution in Calcareous Soil and Yellow Soil of Typical Small Karst Catchments

ZHANG Wei1,2, ZHANG Li-li3,4   

  1. (1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China; 2. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China; 3. School of Geography and Resource, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China; 4. Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic State Monitoring of Watershed, Guiyang 550018, China)
  • Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-12-26

摘要: 分析了贵州普定陈旗和后寨河喀斯特小流域石灰土和黄壤剖面不同深度总硫、碳键硫、酯键硫酸盐、SO42-和总还原态无机硫的含量及其δ34S值、硫酸盐还原菌数量和采样坡地溪水SO42-的δ34S值,目的是阐明喀斯特流域土壤对大气酸沉降的响应。结果表明: 在同等酸沉降水平下,石灰土和黄壤剖面中各形态硫含量、δ34S值及硫酸盐还原菌数量有明显差异,同时溪水中有超过70%的SO42-来自石灰土和黄壤剖面不同深度土壤的输出,指示石灰土和黄壤对大气酸沉降的不同响应。有机硫形成和SO42-异化还原反应是石灰土和黄壤中都存在的硫滞留过程。黄壤剖面存在着SO42-吸附并在底层累积,因此SO42-吸附是黄壤硫滞留的主要原因。石灰土和黄壤剖面输出的SO42-主要来自大气酸沉降输入的SO42-,不是土壤本身有机硫矿化。不过,有机硫是石灰土和黄壤主要的硫形态,在沉降的硫通量显著降低后,这两类剖面有机硫矿化会释放大量的SO42-进入水体。

Abstract: In this paper, we analyzed the contents and δ34S values of total sulfur, carbon-bonded sulfur, ester-bonded sulfate, SO42-, total reduced inorganic sulfur and stream SO42-, and SRB quantity at different depths in calcareous soil and yellow soil profiles in Chenqi and Houzhaihe small karst catchments of Puding County in Guizhou Province, with the aim of elucidating the response of soils in karst catchments to atmospheric acid deposition. The results showed that under the same acid deposition level, there were significant differences in the sulfur content and δ34S values of different sulfur forms and SRB numbers in the calcareous soil and yellow soil profiles. Also more than 70% of the SO42- in the stream water of sampled slope came from soils at different depths in calcareous soil and yellow soil profiles. These results indicate the different response of calcareous soil and yellow soil to atmospheric acid deposition. The formation of organic sulfur and dissimilatory SO42- reduction are sulfur retention processes that exist in both calcareous soil and yellow soil profiles. SO42- adsorption exists in the yellow soil profile and accumulates in the bottom soil layers; therefore, SO42- adsorption is the main cause of sulfur retention in yellow soil. The SO42- exported from the calcareous soil and yellow soil profiles is mainly from SO42- input from atmospheric acid deposition and not from organic sulfur mineralization of the soil itself. However, organic sulfur is the dominant sulfur form in calcareous soil and yellow soil, and organic sulfur mineralization in these two types of profiles may release a large amount of SO42- into the surface water after the sulfur deposition flux is significantly reduced.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[2] 王 磊, 李成丽.  

我国中部地区城市群多中心结构的增长效应 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2231 -2240 .

[3] 童小容, 杨庆媛, 毕国华, . 重庆市2000~2015年土地利用变化时空特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2481 -2495 .
[4] 康婷婷, 徐 欢, 张春华, 胡召玲. 区域尺度农田最大光能利用率参数估算及时空变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2766 -2774 .
[5] 洪步庭 任平. 基于最小累积阻力模型的农村居民点用地生态适宜性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 刘帅 何 青 谢卫明 郭磊城 沈芳. 近15年来长江口控制站徐六泾悬沙变化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 陈 博, 陆玉麒, 潘 颖, 舒 迪, . 基于装备制造业企业的长江经济带网络空间特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 261 -268 .
[8] 李佳佳 贺新光 卢希安. 长江流域月降水的EEMD多时间尺度遥相关分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 黄玥, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 曾立雄, 马良. 基于Mann-Kendall法的三峡库区长江干流入出库断面水质变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 950 -961 .
[10] 韩 静, 芮 旸, 马 滕, 武 鹏, 晁 静. 国家园林县城省际分布格局演化及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 829 -838 .