长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (2): 447-460.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202202018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河流域旅游发展与生态环境耦合协调时空演变及交互胁迫关系验证

王兆峰,李静怡   

  1. (湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-03-21

Verify and Study the Coupling Coordination Development and the Interactive Stress between Tourism and Eco-environment in the Yellow River Basin

 WANG Zhao-feng, LI Jing-yi   

  1. (Tourism College of Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
  • Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-03-21

摘要:  黄河流域生态环境保护和高质量发展上升为重大国家战略,探究旅游产业发展与生态环境耦合协调关系对促进区域高质量发展具有重要的现实意义。通过客观赋权熵值法确定指标权重,结合耦合协调、交互胁迫模型,基于黄河流域特征建立指标体系探究2008~2017年旅游发展和生态环境耦合协调时空演变和交互胁迫关系。结果表明:(1)时序变化上,黄河流域整体旅游发展与生态环境耦合度水平较高(>0.8)且波动不明显,耦合协调度在小范围内呈 “W”型波动上升,但旅游综合发展评价指数相对滞后致使其耦合协调度处于勉强协调状态;(2)空间演变上,上、中、下游的耦合协调度存在明显差异,表现为“东南高,西北低”的空间格局,由下游的中级协调、中游的初级协调过渡到上游的濒临失调;相对发展类型空间分异明显,下游多为生态环境滞后型,上游多为旅游发展滞后型,协调型省份最少且生态环境滞后型省份呈递增趋势; (3)基于双指数函数模型,黄河流域旅游发展与生态环境存在交互胁迫关系,演变轨迹符合多个“S”型曲线组合的发展特征。可通过健全黄河流域旅游生态保护合作框架、完善相关制度等推动黄河流域旅游产业与生态环境协同高质量发展。

Abstract: The ecological environmental protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin have risen to a major national strategy. It is of great practical significance to explore the coupling and coordination between tourism and eco-environment ,which promotes regional high-quality development. The index weights were determined through SEM, and tourism and eco-environment system were established. Combined with coupling coordination and interactive coercion model explored the coupling and coordination spatial-temporal evolution and interactive stress from 2008 to 2017. The results showed that: in timing changes, the coupling level was high(>0.8) and the fluctuation was not obvious, the overall coupling coordination degree showed a “W”-shaped fluctuation in a small range, but the relative lag of the tourism development evaluation index made the degree of coupling coordination in a barely coordinated state; in terms of spatial evolution, there were obvious differences between upstream, middle, and downstream, which is manifested as a spatial pattern of “high in the southeast and low in the northwest”. The degree of coupling coordination transited from downstream intermediate coordination, midstream primary coordination to upstream imbalance. The relative development types had obvious spatial differentiation. The downstream was the lagging type of tourism development, and the middle and upstream was the lagging type of ecological environment; two systems also conformed to the double exponential function model, and there was an interactive stress relationship between them. Provinces can strengthen regional cooperation in tourism environmental protection and optimize the structure of tourism development to promote the coordinated and high-quality development of the tourism industry and ecological environment in the Yellow River Basin.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗友进, 韩国辉, 余端, 李燕, 廖敦秀, 谢永红, 魏朝富. 三峡库区土壤重金属污染评价及其来源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1800 .
[2] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 冯凡, 赵中华, 陈晨, 田园, 郦倩玉, 龚雄虎, 叶晨昊. 铜绿微囊藻对有机毒物菲的生理生态响应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2031 -2041 .
[5] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[6] 魏建瑛 徐建英 樊斐斐. 卧龙自然保护区植被覆盖度变化及其对地形因子的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[8] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[9] 舒旺, 王鹏, 肖汉玉, 刘君政, 赵君, 余小芳. 鄱阳湖流域乐安河水化学特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 681 -690 .
[10] 盖豪, 颜廷武, 何可, 张俊飚, . 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂3省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2141 -2153 .