长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (9): 2060-2072.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202209017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

蓝绿景观结构对城市热岛的减缓效应定量分析

姜允芳1,2,黄静3*   

  1. (1. 华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海 200241; 2. 中国现代城市研究中心,上海 200241;3.华侨城中学,广东 深圳 518053)
  • 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-09-29

Quantitative Analysis of Mitigation Effect of Urban Blue-Green Spaces on Urban Heat Island

JIANG Yun-fang 1,2,HUANG Jing3   

  1. (1. School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;2. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; 3. Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Middle School, Shenzhen 518053, China)
  • Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-29

摘要: 在城市热岛影响城市热舒适性背景下,蓝绿景观空间成为有效减缓城市热岛效应的重要途径。选取上海18条骨干河道滨水区域,采用增长回归树(BRT)模型,量化分析蓝绿景观空间形态结构因子与地表温度之间的边际效应互动影响关系。结果表明:近郊区绿地冷岛效应最强,远郊区次之,中心城区最差。在绿地结构形态指标方面,植被覆盖度和面积是影响绿地降温的主导因素。绿地覆盖度、面积、景观形状指数和地表反照率的边际效应阈值分别是0.3、50 hm2、2和0.16。在蓝绿网络结构指标方面,水面率和距河岸距离影响作用较大。水面率越大,降温越明显。距河岸距离和生态斑块集聚度的边际阈值分别为400 m和75/100。研究可为蓝绿景观空间应对全球气候变化发展提供有益指导。

Abstract: Under the background that urban heat island affects urban thermal comfort, blue-green space has become an important way to effectively mitigate urban heat island effect. Selecting 18 river riparian buffer in Shanghai, the marginal effect of various indices of waterfront green spaces on the distribution of LST was quantitatively analyzed by the boosted regression tree(BRT) model. The results showed that: the cooling island effect of green spaces was the strongest in the urban periphery, followed by the suburb, and the worst was in the central area. In the aspect of spatial morphological factors of green spaces, the index of Fv and area were the dominant impacting factors on the LST. The marginal effect threshold of Fv, area, landscape shape index and albedo were 0.3, 50 hm2, 2 and 0.16, respectively. In the aspect of spatial structure factors among blue spaces and green spaces, the influence of the index of water surface ratio and the distance to riverbank were larger on the LST. The higher water surface ratio is, the more obvious the cooling island effect is. The marginal effect threshold of the distance to riverbank and cohesion value were 400 m and 75/100, respectively. The study can provide useful guidance for the development of blue-green space coping with global climate change.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[2] 张梦薇, 吕成文. 丰乐河流域表层土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1420 .
[3] 郭莎莎, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进. 长江中游地区多尺度耕地景观格局演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1455 .
[4] 杨佳, 葛馨, 吴起鑫. 贵阳市主城区空气质量指数时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1827 .
[5] 张丽琴, 渠丽萍, 吕春艳, 李 玲. 基于空间格局视角的武汉市土地生态系统服务价值研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1988 -1997 .
[6] 田雨 周宝同 付伟 王蓉. 2000-2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究—以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 张文婷. 江西省不同地貌单元耕地土壤有机碳空间变异的尺度效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2619 -2628 .
[8] 曾源源, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进, . 长江中游经济带交通区位条件变化与建设用地扩张时空耦合规律[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2651 -2662 .
[9] 梁辉 王春凯. 201904产业发展对城市蔓延影响的差异性分析—以长江经济带104个城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 杨远琴, 任 平, 洪步庭, . 基于生态安全的三峡库区重庆段土地利用冲突识别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 322 -332 .