长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (2): 394-401.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202302015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

洞庭湖后生浮游动物群落结构及水质生物学评价

张建波1,王丑明2*,黄代中2,张屹2   

  1. (1.湖南省生态环境事务中心,湖南 长沙 410000;2.湖南省洞庭湖生态环境监测中心,湖南 岳阳 414000)
  • 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-03-09

Community Characteristics and Bioassessment of Metazooplankton in Dongting Lake

ZHANG Jian-bo1,WANG Chou-ming2, HUANG Dai-zhong2,ZHANG Yi2   

  1. (1. Ecological and Environmental Affairs Center of Hunan Province, Changsha 410000, China; 2. Dongting Lake Eco-Environment Monitoring Centre of Hunan Province, Yueyang 414000, China)
  • Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-03-09

摘要: 为了解洞庭湖后生浮游动物群落结构、影响因素,客观评价洞庭湖水生态环境质量,为支撑长江流域水生态考核工作提供一定的科学依据,在2019年对洞庭湖16个断面的后生浮游动物开展了3次调查,分别为3月(枯水期)、6月(平水期)和9月(丰水期),并同步监测了12项环境参数。结果表明洞庭湖后生浮游动物样品中共检出2门26属,其中轮虫为9属,枝角类12属,桡足类为5属。洞庭湖后生浮游动物的平均密度为84.4个·L-1,其中轮虫占84.3%,桡足类占13.3%,枝角类占2.4%。东洞庭湖后生浮游动物密度最高,其次为南洞庭湖、入湖口、西洞庭湖和洞庭湖出口。洞庭湖后生浮游动物优势种是广生多肢轮虫(Polyarthra vulgaris)、暗小异尾轮虫(Trichocerca pusilla)、螺形龟甲轮虫(Keratella cochlearis)以及无节幼体(Nauplius)。轮虫对水体营养水平的响应相对比较显著,东洞庭湖营养状态明显高于其它湖区。洞庭湖富营养化导致了后生浮游动物群落结构的小型化,后生浮游动物可以作为湖泊水环境变化的指示性生物。Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) 分析表明叶绿素a、总氮、总磷和透明度是影响洞庭湖后生浮游动物分布的主要影响因素,与国内大多数湖泊浮游动物的影响因素较为一致。采用Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数对洞庭湖进行生物评价,结果显示洞庭湖为轻污染,用后生浮游动物对洞庭湖水生态状况进行评价较为合适。

Abstract: In order to understand the community structure and influencing factors of metazooplankton in Dongting Lake, evaluate the water ecological environment quality of Dongting Lake, and provide a certain scientific basis for supporting the assessment of water ecology in the Yangtze River Basin. We conducted three surveys of metazooplankton in 16 sections of Dongting Lake, respectively in March (dry season), June (normal season) and September (wet season), and monitored 12 environmental parameters simultaneously in 2019.The results showed that the metazooplankton community belonged to 2 phyla and 26 genera, including Rotifera 9 genera, Cladocera 12 genera, Copepoda 5 genera. The average density of metazooplankton was 84.4 ind·L-1, with Rotifera as the most dominant class (accounted for 84.3% of the total density), followed by Copepoda (13.3%) and Cladocera(2.4%). On the spatial distribution, the density of metazooplankton was highest in East Dongting lake, followed by South Dongting lake, estuary, West Dongting Lake and lakeoutlet. The dominant species of metazooplanktonin were Polyarthra vulgaris, Trichocerca pusilla, Keratella cochlearis, Bosmina sp. and Nauplius. The response of rotifers to water nutrient level was relatively significant, and the nutrient status of East Dongting Lake was significantly higher than that of other lakes. Eutrophication of Dongting Lake resulted in the miniaturization of metazooplankton community structure, metazooplankton can be used as indicators of lake water environment changes. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed Chlorophyll A, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and transparency were the key factors controlling the community structure of metazooplankton, it is consistent with the influence factors of zooplankton in most lakes in China. The shannon-Wiener diversity index and Pielou evenness index were used to evaluate the water quality of Dongting Lake, the results showed that the water quality of Dongting Lake was light pollution, it is suitable to evaluate the water ecological status of Dongting Lake by metazooplankton.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[3] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[4] 李雪松 龙湘雪 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[6] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[7] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[8] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[9] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[10] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .