洞庭湖流域分布式水文模型

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201508006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 流域出口径流观测序列是水文模型参数率定重要依据,不受水文站控制区域的模型应用是水文研究关注点之一。首先根据水文站观测资料建立洞庭湖流域四水控制站之上基于水文响应单元的分布式水文模型,在此基础上结合实验、同质移植和虚拟水库等方法,将分布式水文模型拓展到包含无径流站控制区域的丘陵区间和平原圩垸区,最终实现了洞庭湖全流域水文过程模拟。结果表明:在较完备土壤、地形、土地利用等空间数据支持下,通过合理的流域划分和水文响应单元定义,建立的流域分布式水文模型可以较好地在水文响应单元尺度反应降水发生后蒸散、地表径流、土壤和地下水的响应特征。而基于观测实验及基流分割等方法获取的关键水文过程特征对模型参数优化的认识,可以提高模型参数率定效率,在较少优化迭代运算后既可使月径流模拟的效率系数NSE和确定性系数R²值高于0.81(日过程高于0.62)。借助参数同质移植和虚拟水库解决了区间和圩垸区无控制站区域水文过程模拟。在全流域水文过程的模拟中,基流指数和蒸散比例与实际过程具有较好的一致性。说明相关参数较好地反映了其物理机制,具备在相似气候及下垫面条件区域进行同质移植的基础,圩垸区径流交换采用虚拟水库的处理方式也合理可行。

关键词: 分布式水文模型, 水文响应单元(HRUs), 径流模拟, 洞庭湖, 湖泊流域过程

Abstract: Distributed hydrological model becomes an important tool for revealing the temporal and spatial characteristics of water cycles at ranging scale. But the application of the model at regions without runoff observations is still a major obstacle to overcome. In this study, a HRU-based distributed hydrological model was developed with SWAT for a large lake basin based on DEM, land use, reservoir, climate and hydrological data. To obtain a deterministic and physical mechanism clear parameter system some field work on understanding of parameters was performed, then the calibrated and validated with SUFI-2 algorithm were conducted within the hydrological gauging station control regions by using SWAT-CUP. The results show that the application of the model could be more efficient with field knowledge support about rational value ranges of the parameters. The efficiency coefficient values NSE and the correlation of determination coefficient R² values were easily reaching 0.81 at monthly step (0.62 for daily simulation), and the number of iteration progress was also largely reduced. In this distributed model, the hydrological response unit (HRUs) reflects the heterogeneity of hydrological behaviors of the catchment in space. Thus, some of the hydro-parameters are transportable between HRUs with similar conditions of terrain, land use and soil attributes. Base on the experimental knowledge and output of parameters from validation, the hydrological model was extended covering the whole basin by homogeneous transplantation of hydro-parameters in HRUs. For the ponder regions, the flow exchange process was dealt by introducing a virtual reservoir for each independent ponder. The output of the extended model successfully reveals the characters of ratios among ET, surface runoff, baseflow at a HRU, sub-basin and basin scales. The simulated baseflow, and ET processes are well consist with BFI and remote sending retrieved ET data. From the application of this study, a detailed database covering land use, soil properties and meteorology is an essential pre-requisite condition to start a distributed hydrological model. A logical parameter assembling is not only important for the set-up of distributed hydrological model, it is also crucial for its extending application. And the extendable of the model is also largely decided by the reasonable delineation for watershed and HRUs. The application has especially contributed for hydrological modeling in regions of gauging flow is partly absent in space. The parameters of HRUs which were generated from the modeling processes could be valuable support information for the study of water retention, vulnerability analysis, and spatial planning in view of the hydrological and ecological effects, which in turn may largely reduce the uncertainty analysis in land hydrology.

Key words: distributed hydrological model, hydrological response units (HRUs), runoff simulation, Dongting Lake, Lake-catchment processes

中图分类号:

P339

孙占东, 黄群, LOTZ Tom. 洞庭湖流域分布式水文模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1299-1304.

SUN Zhan-dong, HUANG Qun, LOTZ Tom. PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION FOR SWAT MODEL AND ITS EXTENDED APPLICATION IN THE DONGTING LAKE BASIN, YANGTZE RIVER[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(08): 1299-1304.

参考文献

[1] ARNOLD J G, SRINIVASAN R, MUTTIAH R S, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment-Part 1: Model development [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998, 34(1): 73-89.
[2] NEITSCH S L, ARNOLD J G, KINIRY J R, et al. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentatio version 2000[M]. Texas:Texas Research Institute, 2002.
[3] 王中根,刘昌明,黄友波. SWAT模型的原理、结构及应用研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2003,22(1):79-86.
[4] GASSMAN P W, REYES M, GREEN C H, et al. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future directions [J]. Trans ASABE, 2007, 50(4): 1211-1250.
[5] MULETA M K, NICKLOW J W.Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 306(1):127-146.
[6] ABBASPOUR K C.SWAT-CUP4A : SWAT Calibration and uncertainty programs[EB/OL].[2001].http:www.docin.com/p-486437061.html.
[7] YANG J, REICHERT P, ABBASPOUR K C,et al. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to Chaohe Basin in China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 358(1-2):1-23.
[8] SETEGN S G, SRINIVASAN R. SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia [J]. Hydrol Process, 2010, 24: 357-367.
[9] ARNOLD J G, MUTTIAH R S, SRINIVASAN R, et al. Regional estimation of baseflow and groundwater recharge in the upper Mississippi basin [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 227: 21-40.
[10] CHOW V T, MAIDMENT D R, LARRY M. Applied Hydrology[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
[11] BEVEN K. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2001, 5: 1-12.
[12] SIVAPALAN M, TAKEUCHI K, FRANKS S W, et al. IAHS decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2003, 48: 857-880.
[13] 史学正,于东升,孙维侠等. 中美土壤分类系统的参比基准研究: 土类与美国系统分类土纲间的参比[J]. 科学通报, 2004,49(13):1298-1303.
[14] NACHTERGAELE F, VAN VELTHUIZEN H, VERELST L, et al. Harmonized world soil database version 1.2 [M].Rome,Laxenburg,Austrica:FAO,Rome,Italy and DASA, 2012.
[15] JAYAKRISHNAN R, SRINIVASAN R, CANTHI C, et al. Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2005(19): 749-762.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘冀, 孙周亮, 张特, 程雄, 董晓华, 谈新. 基于不同卫星降雨产品的澴水花园流域径流模拟比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2558-2567.
[2]	戴雪, 何征, 万荣荣, 杨桂山. 近35 a长江中游大型通江湖泊季节性水情变化规律研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 118-125.
[3]	黄钰瀚, 张增信, 费明哲, 金秋. TRMM 3B42卫星降水数据在赣江流域径流模拟中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1618-1625.
[4]	李敏, 张灿明, 李姣, 邓学建. 基于淹水特征的分时段湿地生态系统管理——以南洞庭湖万子湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 769-776.
[5]	谢谦, 朱翔, 贺清云, 徐美. 洞庭湖区血吸虫病疫水人水相互作用关系及防控方案研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 655-663.
[6]	王婷, 章新平, 黎祖贤, 罗紫东, 廖梦思, 刘娜. 近52年来洞庭湖流域气象干旱的时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 514-522.
[7]	李敏, 张灿明, 李姣, 邓学建. 南洞庭湖湿地鱼类生境景观变化及其人为驱动[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2069-2075.
[8]	王琦, 欧伏平, 张雷, 卢少勇. 三峡工程运行后洞庭湖水环境变化及影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1843-1849.
[9]	孙葭, 章新平, 黄一民. 不同再分析降水数据在洞庭湖流域的精度评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1850-1859.
[10]	张晓艳, 刘梅先. 洞庭湖流域高温热浪风险变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1729-1735.
[11]	邵佳丽, 郑伟, 刘诚. 卫星遥感洞庭湖主汛期水体时空变化特征及影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1315-1321.
[12]	夏智宏, 周月华, 许红梅. 基于SWAT模型的汉江流域水资源对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 158-.
[13]	凌, 峰, 杜, 耘, 肖, 飞, 吴胜军, 薛怀平. 分布式TOPMODEL模型在清江流域降雨径流模拟中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(01): 48-.
[14]	张利平, 陈小凤, 张晓琳, 宋星原. VIC模型与SWAT模型在中小流域径流模拟中的对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(8): 745-.
[15]	刘志勇赖格英潘少明. 赣江源头流域植被变化的水文响应模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 446-.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed