长江流域资源与环境 >> 2008, Vol. 17 >> Issue (1): 6-6.

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

节约型社会评价指标体系构建及应用研究

朱有志|周海燕   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-20

ON INDICATOR SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE SAVING SOCIETY AND ITS APPLICATION

ZHU Youzhi|ZHOU Haiyan   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-01-20

摘要:

为了评价节约型社会建设水平,根据建设节约型社会的内涵,遵循指标体系构建的一般原则,借鉴相关研究成果,采用专家咨询法,构建了由生产成本型节约、消费适度型节约、效率提高型节约、循环利用型节约、环境保护型节约、资源储备型节约、文化制度型节约7个准则层共47个指标组成的评价指标体系,并用该指标体系对全国各省市区进行了横向比较应用研究。用因子分析法计算了各省份各准则层节约分值及综合节约分值。用聚类分析法将各省份分成3种节约类型:相对高度节约类型、相对中度节约类型、相对低度节约类型。研究结果表明,属于相对高度节约和相对中度节约类型的省份位于东部沿海地区,经济增长正向集约型转变,产业结构向高级化转变,人们的节约意识较强;属于相对低度节约类型的省份位于中西部地区,经济增长方式仍是粗放型,产业结构仍处低水平状态。最后,提出了一些政策建议。

关键词: 节约型社会, 评价指标体系, 因子分析, 聚类分析, 节约类型

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the level of resourcesaving society construction,following common principles for establishment of indicator system,and using experts consultation method,an indicator system consisting of 7 criterion layers and 47 indicators was established based on the connotation of resourcesaving society.The 7 criterion layers included such saving types as productioncost saving,suitable consumption saving,efficiency enhancement,circular utilization,environmental protection,resources reserve,and civilization system.Then the indicator system was applied to compare the saving level of Chinese provinces and cities horizontally.Saving scores of each criterion layer and general saving scores of all provinces were calculated by adopting the method of factor analysis.According to the calculation results,all provinces were divided into three types—highlevel saving type,midlevel saving type and lowlevel saving type.The results indicated that,provinces in eastern China are comparatively more economical,with economic growth type transforming toward intensive economic growth direction,the structure of production improving toward highgrade,and people having strong consciousness of saving.But the central and western China are not economical—the mode of economic growth is still extensive,and the production structure is still at lowlevel.Several suggestions were put forward at last.

Key words: resourcesaving society, indicator system for evaluation, factor analysis, cluster analysis, saving type

[1] 杨超杰, 贺斌, 段伟利, 李冰, 陈雯, 杨桂山. 太湖典型丘陵水源地水质时空变化及影响因素分析——以平桥河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 273-281.
[2] 叶潇潇, 赵一飞. 基于聚类分析的长江三角洲港口群可持续发展水平评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 17-24.
[3] 任俊霖, 李浩, 伍新木, 李雪松. 基于主成分分析法的长江经济带省会城市水生态文明评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1537-1544.
[4] 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 戴梦琴, 王祥, 康海迪. 基于DEMATEL的区域洪涝灾害恢复力影响因素及评价指标体系研究——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1577-1583.
[5] 黄敬军, 赵立鸿, 缪世贤, 张丽. 江苏省山体资源保护区划及对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1337-1344.
[6] 龚珞军, 杨学芬, 熊邦喜 , 周, 敏, 程咸立. 武汉市夏季湖泊水体理化指标主成份和聚类分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(6): 550-.
[7] 戴天晟 孙绍荣 赵文会 顾宝炎. 区域水资源可持续利用评价的FAHP-PP模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 421-.
[8] 方国华, 夏春凤, 于凤存. 水利枢纽施工干扰区生态系统综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1193-.
[9] 顾胜,; 李思悦, 张全发. 汉江堵河流域地表水质时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 41-.
[10] 周金星, 魏 远, 漆良华, 张旭东. 基于ISODATA法的三峡库区生态区划[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 446-446.
[11] 严圣华, 李兆华, 周振兴. 九宫山自然保护区功能模糊综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 446-446.
[12] 张昌顺,李 昆,马姜明,郑志新. 施肥对印楝人工林生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 329-329.
[13] 胡振鹏,汪勤峰,张孝锋. 循环经济园区发展的技术经济分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 136-136.
[14] 王波,宗跃光. 基于分解步骤法的浙江开化县域综合生态分区[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 206-206.
[15] 吕爱清,邱爱保,卞新民,杜国平,陈路扬. 江西食物生产波动特征与效率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 196-196.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!