长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (06): 965-973.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201606013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

南水北调东线工程徐州段河流生境质量评价

王雁1, 赵家虎1,2, 黄琪3,1, 高俊峰1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 江苏 南京 210008;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3. 江西师范大学鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室, 江西 南昌 330022
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-23 修回日期:2016-01-08 出版日期:2016-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 高俊峰 E-mail:gaojunf@niglas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:王雁(1983~),女,博士,主要从事流域生态资源利用与环境效应研究.E-mail:ywang@niglas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家水污染治理重大专项(2012ZX07501002-008,2012ZX07506-001,2012ZX07103003-04-01,2012ZX07501-001-03);国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB417006)

ASSESSMENT OF RIVER HABITAT QUALITY OF XUZHOU REACH ON EAST ROUTE OF SOUTH TO NORTH WATER TRANSFER PROJECT

WANG Yan1, ZHAO Jia-hu1,2, HUANG Qi3,1, GAO Jun-feng1   

  1. 1. Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
    2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland Research, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Namchang 330022, China
  • Received:2015-08-23 Revised:2016-01-08 Online:2016-06-20
  • Supported by:
    Major S &T Special Project of Water Pollution Control and Management of China(2012ZX07501002-008,2012ZX07506-001,2012ZX07103003-04-01,2012ZX07501-001-03);National Key Basic Research Program of China (2012CB417006)

摘要: 河流生境质量评价是河流生态系统健康评价的关键之一。本文评价自然和人为作用下的河流生境质量,以南水北调东线工程徐州段丰县、邳州两市输水通道上的河流为研究对象,结合环境特点,选择了反映河道生境、河岸生境和滨岸带生境的10个指标,给出了每个指标的评价方法和5级标准特征值,建立河流生境质量评价体系,确定评价指标的等级标准,对研究区内16个河段的生境质量状况进行综合评价。结果表明:(1)河流生境质量指数(IRHQ)综合得分介于33~91。根据评价等级划分标准,其中有50%的河段生境质量达到"优"等,其余介于"良"等到"劣"等,河流生境质量整体状况良好。(2)河流生境质量指数与NH4+-N、COD、TN呈负相关,与DO呈正相关,多项生境指标也与水质指标具有相关性,表明生境质量与水质的相互影响。

关键词: 河流生境, 指标体系, 质量评价, 南水北调东线

Abstract: Assessment of river habitat quality is one of the keys to the assessment of river ecosystem healthIn this paper, an assessment system of river habitat quality was established according to environmental characteristics of rivers in Xuzhou Reach on east route of South to North Water Transfer Project in Northern Jiangsu. This system included 10 indices of river habitat quality for three different habitats (channel, bank, and riparian habitats). The results indicate that the habitat quality assessment score ranged from 33 to 91. According to the criteria of habitat quality, the scores are classified into five categories, namely excellent, good, fair, poor and very poor. The behaviors of 16 reaches were 8 "excellent", 4 "good", 1 "fair", 1"poor" and 2 "very poor", respectively. The rivers in the regions of the project possessed favorable habitat quality which varied mostly between levels of excellent and good. The comprehensive river habitat assessment indicator was negatively correlated with NH4+-N , COD, TN, and positively correlated with DO. Most of habitat quality indices were also correlated with the water quality index. It was indicated the interaction between habitat quality and water quality.

Key words: river habitat, indices, assessment of quality, east route of South to North Water Transfer Project

中图分类号: 

  • X826
[1] 王建华, 田景汉, 吕宪国. 挠力河流域河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 20(2): 481-486. [WANG J H, TIAN J H, Lü X G. Assessment of stream habitat quality in Naoli River Watershed, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 20(2): 481-486.]
[2] PARSONS M, NORRIS R. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1996, 36(2): 419-434.
[3] 王 强, 袁兴中, 刘 红, 等. 基于河流生境调查的东河河流生境评价[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(6): 1548-1558. [WANG Q, YUAN X Z, LIU H, et al. Stream habitat assessment of Dong River, China, using River Habitat Survey method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 1548-1558.]
[4] 栾建国, 陈文祥. 河流生态系统的典型特征和服务功能[J]. 人民长江, 2004, 35(9): 41-43. [LUAN J G, CHEN W X. Typical characteristics and service function of river ecological system[J]. Yangtze River, 2004, 35(9): 41-43.]
[5] 王 琼, 范志平, 李法云, 等. 蒲河流域河流生境质量综合评价及其与水质响应关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(2): 516-523. [WANG Q, FAN Z P, LI F Y, et al. River habitat quality assessment, water quality analysis and their response relation of Puhe River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(2): 516-523.]
[6] 郑丙辉, 张 远, 李英博. 辽河流域河流栖息地评价指标与评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6): 928-936. [ZHENG B H, ZHANG Y, LI Y B. Study of indicators and methods for river habitat assessment of Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(6): 928-936.]
[7] BARBOUR M T, GERRITSEN J, SNYDER B D, et al. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish[M]. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, office of water 1999.
[8] U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Standards for the development of habitat suitability index models[M]. Washington, DC: Ecology Service Manual 103, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Sciences, 1981.
[9] WHITE L J, LADSON A R. An index of stream condition: user's manual[M]. 2nd edition, Melbourne: Department of Natural Resources and Environment, 1999: 1-22.
[10] PARSONS M, THOMS M, NORRIS R. Australian River Assessment System: Review of Physical River Assessment Methods-A Biological Perspective[M]. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report Number 21. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia and University of Canberra, 2002: 2-10.
[11] 刘 华, 蔡 颖, 於梦秋, 等. 太湖流域宜兴片河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(5): 1288-1295. [LIU H, CAI Y, YU M Q, et al. Assessment of river habitat quality in Yixing district of Taihu Lake basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(5): 1288-1295.]
[12] 夏 霆, 朱 伟, 姜谋余, 等. 城市河流栖息地评价方法与应用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(12): 2095-2104. [XIA T, ZHU W, JIANG M Y, et al. Assessment of urban river habitats: application and methodology[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(12): 2095-2104.]
[13] 左 倬, 由文辉, 汪冬冬. 上海青浦区不同用地类型河流滨岸带生境及植物群落组成[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 116-121. [ZUO Z, YOU W H, WANG D D. Riparian habitat and plant community composition under different land use types in Qingpu district, Shanghai[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(1): 116-121.]
[14] 曹 敏, 吴阿娜, 车 越, 等. RBPs在苏州河水系生境评价中的应用[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012(3): 130-137. [CAO M, WU E N, CHE Y, et al. Application of RBPs for the habitat assessment of Suzhou Creek[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 2012(3): 130-137.]
[15] 董哲仁. 河流健康评估的原则和方法[J]. 中国水利, 2005(10): 17-19. [DONG Z R. Principles and methods of river health assessment[J]. China Water Resources, 2005(10): 17-19.]
[16] 杨爱民, 张 璐, 甘 泓, 等. 南水北调东线一期工程受水区生态环境效益评估[J]. 水利学报, 2011, 42(5): 563-571. [YANG A M, ZHANG L, GAN H, et al. Evaluation on eco-environmental benefits in water reception areas of the East-route Phase 1 Project of the South-to-North Water Diversion[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, 42(5): 563-571.]
[17] 蔡邦成, 陆根法, 宋莉娟, 等. 南水北调东线水源地保护区生态建设的生态经济效益评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 384-387. [CAI B C, LU G F, SONG L J, et al. Eco-economy benefit evaluation of ecological construction in the water resource protection zone for eastern south-to-north water transfer project[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(3): 384-387.]
[18] 赵世新, 张 晨, 高学平, 等. 南水北调东线调度对南四湖水质的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2012, 24(6): 923-931. [ZHAO S X, ZHANG C, GAO X P, et al. The impact of the operation of eastern route project of the south-to-north water diversion project on water quality in Lake Nansi[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2012, 24(6): 923-931.]
[19] 于少鹏, 孙广友, 孙雅萍, 等. 南水北调东线工程沿线湖沼湿地生态环境特征及退化分析[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(2): 121-127. [YU S P, SUN G Y, SUN Y P, et al. Features and degradation of eco-environment of lakes and marshes along the east route of the south-to-north water transfer project[J]. Resources Science, 2005, 27(2): 121-127.]
[20] HUANG Q, GAO J F, CAI Y J, et al. Development and application of benthic macroinvertebrate-based multimetric indices for the assessment of streams and rivers in the Taihu Basin, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 48: 649-659.
[21] 阮晓红, 朱维斌. 南水北调东线工程江苏段水污染防治对策研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(6): 79-82. [RUAN X H, ZHU W B. Measures for prevention of water pollution in Jiangsu section of South-to-North Water Transfer East Line Project[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2002, 30(6): 79-82.]
[22] 胡永定, 韩宝平, 杜 娟. 南水北调东线徐州段水环境现状及其污染防治对策[J]. 土壤, 2007, 39(3): 483-487. [HU Y D, HAN B P, DU J. Water quality of Xuzhou block of the south to north water transfer project and countermeasures[J]. Soils, 2007, 39(3): 483-487.]
[23] RAVEN P J, HOLMES N T H, DAWSON F H, et al. River habitat survey in Britain and Ireland: field survey guidance manual: 2003 version[R]. London: Environment Agency, 2003.
[24] 孟 伟, 张 远, 渠晓东. 河流生态调查技术方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 33-58. [MENG W, ZHANG Y, QU X D. Guideline for River Ecological Survey[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 33-58.]
[25] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002. [State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Monitoring and analysis methods for water and wastewater[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: Chinese Environmental Science Press, 2002.]
[26] 冯 彦, 何大明, 杨丽萍. 河流健康评价的主评指标筛选[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3): 389-398. [FENG Y, HE D M, YANG L P, et al. Selection of major evaluation indicators on river health evaluation[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(3): 389-398.]
[27] 张 远, 赵 瑞, 渠晓东, 等. 辽河流域河流健康综合评价方法研究[J]. 中国工程学, 2013, 15(3): 11-18. [ZHANG Y, ZHAO R, QU X D, et al. The researches of integrated river health assessment of Liaohe River basin[J]. Engineering Science, 2013, 15(3): 11-18.]
[28] 魏 成, 刘 平. 人工湿地污水净化效率与根际微生物群落多样性的相关性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(6): 2401-2406. [WEI C, LIU P. Relationship between wastewater purification and diversity of rhizosphere microorganism in the con-structed wetland[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(6): 2401-2406.]
[29] 吴建强. 不同坡度缓冲带滞缓径流及污染物去除定量化[J]. 水科学进展, 2011, 22(1): 112-117. [WU J Q. Quantitative study of the damping effect of buffer strips with different slopes on runoff and pollutant removal efficiency[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2011, 22(1): 112-117.]
[30] 王 琼, 李法云, 范志平, 等. 大伙房水库入库河流物理生境评价及其对水质状况的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(9): 2850-2859. [WANG Q, LI F Y, FAN Z P, et al. Assessment of river physical habitat and its relationship with water quality in the Dahuofang Reservoir inflow rivers[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(9): 2850-2859.]
[31] 毛战坡, 尹澄清, 王雨春, 等. 污染物在农田溪流生态系统中的动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(12): 2614-2623. [MAO Z P, YIN C Q, WANG Y C, et al. A study on nitrogen transport in a farmland stream in Liuchahe watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(12): 2614-2623.]
[32] 赵同谦, 徐华山, 任玉芬, 等. 滨河湿地对农业非点源氮污染控制研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2(11): 1441-1446. [ZHAO T Q, XU H S, REN Y F, et al. Research progress in agricultural non-point nitrogen pollution control in riparian wetlands[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(11): 1441-1446.]
[33] 李怀恩, 李 越, 蔡 明, 等. 河流水质与流域人类活动之间的关系[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2004, 15(1): 24-28. [LI H E, LI Y, CAI M, et al. Relationships between river water quality and human activities in watershed [J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 2004, 15(1): 24-28.]
[34] 陈明曦, 陈芳清, 刘德富. 应用景观生态学原理构建城市河道生态护岸[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 97-101. [CHEN M X, CHEN F Q, LIU D F. Application of landscape ecology in construction of natural river levee[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2007, 16(1): 97-101.]
[1] 叶潇潇, 赵一飞. 基于聚类分析的长江三角洲港口群可持续发展水平评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 17-24.
[2] 陈诚, 林晨. 苏南地区耕地质量评价与分区保护研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1860-1869.
[3] 任俊霖, 李浩, 伍新木, 李雪松. 基于主成分分析法的长江经济带省会城市水生态文明评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1537-1544.
[4] 王婷, 方国华, 刘羽, 刘飞飞. 基于最严格水资源管理制度的初始水权分配研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1870-1875.
[5] 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 戴梦琴, 王祥, 康海迪. 基于DEMATEL的区域洪涝灾害恢复力影响因素及评价指标体系研究——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1577-1583.
[6] 黄敬军, 赵立鸿, 缪世贤, 张丽. 江苏省山体资源保护区划及对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1337-1344.
[7] 程军蕊, 徐继荣, 郑琦宏, 陈鹏程. 宁波市城区河道水环境综合整治效果评价方法及应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 1060-1066.
[8] 施泽明, 倪师军, 张成江, 谭晓莲, 高志友. 基于元素毒性赋值的模糊数学环境质量评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 209-.
[9] 戴天晟 孙绍荣 赵文会 顾宝炎. 区域水资源可持续利用评价的FAHP-PP模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 421-.
[10] 唐琦 王辰. 试从地理学视角探讨区域综合竞争力的指标体系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 205-210.
[11] 王晓峰, 赵璐, 解维宁. 南水北调中线陕西水源区环境质量评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1137-.
[12] 游文荪| 丁惠君*| 许新发. 鄱阳湖水生态安全现状评价与趋势研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1173-.
[13] 方国华, 夏春凤, 于凤存. 水利枢纽施工干扰区生态系统综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1193-.
[14] 杨 红, 袁政涛, 刘健, 陈锦辉, 吴健辉, 王春峰, 焦俊鹏. 上海隧桥工程海域生态系统健康的初步评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1031-.
[15] 叶 浩,濮励杰,张 健,涂小松. 快速城市化地区土地综合质量评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 366-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[2] 李 生,张守攻,姚小华,任华东. 黔中石漠化地区不同土地利用方式对土壤环境的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 384 .
[3] 于国荣,夏自强,叶辉,王桂华,吴 瑶. 大坝下游河段的河流生态径流调控研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 606 .
[4] 吕东亮. 汉江水质优于长江的原因刍议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 102 -104 .
[5] 彭刚华,黄良英. 长江水质评价和预测模型探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 77 -82 .
[6] 张 静,汪诚信,白呼群,苏崇鳌,鄂启顺,武桂珍,黄玉英. 三峡库区虫媒和自然疫源性疾病分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 145 -148 .
[7] 张 雷,吴映梅. 长江干流地区区域发展与国家工业化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 633 -637 .
[8] 谢 辉,张 雷,姜 巍,程晓凌. 21世纪初华中地区发展的资源环境基础[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 1 -5 .
[9] 魏 伟,周 婕,许 峰. 大城市边缘区土地利用时空格局模拟——以武汉市洪山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 174 -179 .
[10] 李友辉,董增川,孔琼菊. 廖坊水利工程对抚河流域生态承载力的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 148 .