长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (01): 142-149.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201701017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

SPEI及SPI指数在滇西南地区干旱演变中的对比分析

赵平伟1, 郭萍1, 李立印1, 舒珺2   

  1. 1. 云南省临沧市气象局, 云南 临沧 677099;
    2. 中山大学环境科学与工程学院大气科学系, 广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-13 修回日期:2016-06-25 出版日期:2017-01-20
  • 作者简介:赵平伟(1983~),男,工程师,主要研究方向为气象数据数理统计分析及气象环境.E-mail:7203956@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    云南省气象局预报员专项项目(YB201215)

COMPARISON OF SPEI AND SPI INDEX ON ACCOUNT OF THE DROUGHTS OF THE SOUTHWEST YUNNAN AREA

ZHAO Ping-wei1, GUO Ping1, LI Li-yin1, SHU Jun2   

  1. 1. Lincang Meteorological Bureauof Yunnan Province, Linchang, 677099, China;
    2. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2016-05-13 Revised:2016-06-25 Online:2017-01-20
  • Supported by:
    Special Project of Yunnan Meteorological Bureau (YB201215)

摘要: 以滇西南地区为研究区,计算出近53 a该区及周边44个气象站点标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)和标准化降水指数(SPI)。运用M-K突变检测和Morlet小波交换等方法,对滇西南地区两种指数对应下的4种类型季节连旱变化特征进行系统分析。结果表明:近53 a中,两种指数判定的同一时间尺度下的干旱事件次数和发生时间基本统一,4种类型季节连旱事件为12~14次,多存在并发性;4个季节连旱时段上两种指数均存在3 a左右显著周期变化;同一时段上,两种指数在趋势变化格局空间分布和变化程度上均存在着较大差异,4个时段上的干湿变化趋势也表现出SPEI呈变干趋势,SPI则变干、变湿各为一半的明显不同,这主要是由于期间研究区显著增温加剧了“降水量-蒸散”的水分平衡;与SPI相比,SPEI考虑了热量因子对潜在蒸散发的贡献,能较好地对气候变暖背景下研究区干旱进行刻画。

关键词: 滇西南地区, 标准化降水指数, 标准化降水蒸散指数, 干旱演变

Abstract: As one of the most serious meteorological disaster, droughts affect the society, economy and the people's livelihood severely. Since the coming of twenty-first century, there are more frequent droughts in the Southwestern region of China. The serious phenomenon is spreading from Northern China to Southwest China. In order to better understand and comprehend the evolution characteristics of droughts in the Southwestern region of China, the changes of droughts in the different time periods (1961-2013) in the Southwest Yunnan area were systematically analyzed according to the evaluation criteria of Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) as well as the Mann-Kendall (MK) test method and Morlet wavelet analysis. The experimental results indicated that the weather status based on SPI index tended to become remarkably drier than that based on SPEI index in the former 33a in the Southwest Yunnan area. In the following 20a, the contrary is the case. On account of the same evaluation index, the frequency and occurrence time of droughts at the same time period was fundamentally consistent. In terms of the two indices, there were about 3a of periodic changes at four time periods. In the 53a, it tended to become dry based on the evaluation of two indexes in from December to June in the next year and from November to June in the next year. It tends to become slightly dry based on the SPEI index from December to May in the next year and from November to May in the next year while it tended to become slightly wet based on the SPI index. According to the spatiotemporal distribution of dry and wet weather, there were great differences in the spatial distribution of change patterns and change scope in the four time periods that were easy to have droughts based on the evaluation of the two indices, The main reason is that the water balance (precipitation minus evapotranspiration) was increased with the notable increase of the temperature in the researched area. Compared with SPI, SPEI has covered the impact of thermal factors in the potential evapotranspiration, therefore it is more effective to investigate the evolutions of the regional droughts under the background of climate warming.

Key words: Southwest Yunnan, SPI, SPEI, Drought evolution

中图分类号: 

  • P467
[1] WU H, SVOBODA M D, HAYES M J, et al. Appropriate application of the standardized precipitation index in arid locations and dry seasons[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2007, 27(1):65-79.
[2] 唐宝琪, 延军平, 李双双, 等.近55年来华东地区旱涝时空变化特征[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(3):497-505. [TANG B Q, YAN J P, LI S S, et al. Evolution of spatiotemporal characteristics of floods and droughts in east China from 1960 to 2014[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(3):497-505.]
[3] 杨世刚, 杨德保, 赵桂香, 等.三种干旱指数在山西省干旱分析中的比较[J].高原气象, 2011, 30(5):1406-1414. [YANG S G, YANG D B, ZHAO G X, et al. Comparision of three drought indices in drought of Shanxi province[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2011, 30(5):1406-1414.]
[4] 谢五三, 王胜, 唐为安, 等.干旱指数在淮河流域的适用性对比[J].应用气象学报, 2014, 25(2):176-184. [XIE W S, WANG S, TANG W A, et al. Comparative analysis on the applicability of drought indexes in the Huaihe river basin[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2014, 25(2):176-184.]
[5] 王林, 陈文.近百年西南地区干旱的多时间尺度演变特征[J].气象科技进展, 2012, 2(4):21-26. [WANG L, CHEN W. Characteristics of multi-timescale variabilities of the drought over last 100 years in southwest China[J]. Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology, 2012, 2(4):21-26.]
[6] 熊光洁, 王式功, 李崇银, 等.三种干旱指数对西南地区适用性分析[J].高原气象, 2014, 33(3):686-697. [XIONG G J, WANG S G, LI C Y, et al. Analysis of applicability of three drought indices for drought events in southwest China[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2014, 33(3):686-697.]
[7] 熊光洁, 张博凯, 李崇银, 等.基于SPEI的中国西南地区1961-2012年干旱变化特征分析[J].气候变化研究进展, 2013, 9(3):192-198. [XIONG G J, ZHANG B K, LI C Y, et al. Characteristics of drought variations in southwest China in 1961-2012 based on SPEI[J]. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis, 2013, 9(3):192-198.]
[8] 王东, 张勃, 安美玲, 等.基于SPEI的西南地区近53 a干旱时空特征分析[J].自然资源学报, 2014, 29(6):1003-1016. [WANG D, ZHANG B, AN M L, et al. Temporal and spatial distributions of drought in southwest China over the past 53 years based on standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(6):1003-1016.]
[9] 张万诚, 郑建萌, 任菊章.云南极端气候干旱的特征分析[J].灾害学, 2013, 28(1):59-64. [ZHANG W C, ZHENG J M, REN J Z. Climate characteristics of extreme drought events in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2013, 28(1):59-64.]
[10] 温克刚, 刘建华.中国气象灾害大典-云南卷[M].北京:气象出版社, 2006.
[11] VICENTE-SERRANO S M, BEGUERÍA S, LÓPEZ-MORENO J I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming:the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J]. Journal of Climate, 2009, 23(7):1696-1718.
[12] MCKEE T B, DOESKEN N J, KLEIST J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales[C]//Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. Anaheim, California:American Meterological Society, 1993:179-184.
[13] 明博, 陶洪斌, 王璞.基于标准化降水蒸散指数研究干旱对北京地区作物产量的影响[J].中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(5):28-36. [MING B, TAO H B, WANG P. Impact of drought on grain yield in Beijing investigated by SPEI-based methods[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2013, 18(5):28-36.]
[14] 许玲燕, 王慧敏, 段琪彩, 等.基于SPEI的云南省夏玉米生长季干旱时空特征分析[J].资源科学, 2013, 35(5):1024-1034. [XU L Y, WANG H M, DUAN Q C, et al. The temporal and spatial distribution of droughts during summer corn growth in yunnan province based on SPEI[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(5):1024-1034.]
[15] 胡学平, 王式功, 许平平, 等.2009-2013年中国西南地区连续干旱的成因分析[J].气象, 2014, 40(10):1216-1229. [HU X P, WANG S G, XU P P, et al. Analysis on causes of continuous drought in southwest China during 2009-2013[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2014, 40(10):1216-1229.]
[16] 云南减灾年鉴编委会.云南减灾年鉴(2004-2005)[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2006.
[17] 云南减灾年鉴编委会.云南减灾年鉴(2008-2009)[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2010.
[18] 云南减灾年鉴编委会. 云南减灾年鉴(2010-2011)[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2012.
[19] 程建刚, 解明恩. 近50年云南区域气候变化特征分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(5):19-26. [CHENG J G, XIE M N. The analysis of regional climate change features over Yunnan in recent 50 years[J]. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(5):19-26.]
[20] 王林, 陈文. 标准化降水蒸散指数在中国干旱监测的适用性分析[J]. 高原气象, 2014, 33(2):423-431. [WANG L, CHEN W. Applicability analysis of standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index in drought monitoring in China[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2014, 33(2):423-431.]
[1] 龚艳冰, 戴靓靓, 胡娜, 刘高峰, 张继国. 基于云推理和模糊逻辑关系模型的干旱等级预测方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1273-1278.
[2] 唐宝琪, 延军平, 李双双, 刘永林. 近55年来华东地区旱涝时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 497-505.
[3] 吴志杰, 何云玲. 基于SPEI的云南中部区域干旱时空变化特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1238-1245.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 强.
近40年来长江流域水沙变化趋势及可能影响因素探讨
[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 257 .
[2] 袁旭音. 污染河道的常量和微量元素特征及指示意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 270 .
[3] 张其成,姚亦锋,蒋成煜. 南京城市滨江带功能演变及现代景观规划研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 30 -34 .
[4] 胡鸿兴,康洪莉,贡国鸿,朱觅辉5,郑文勤5,吴法清,何定富,李振文,耿 栋5. 湖北省湿地冬季水鸟多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 422 -428 .
[5] 吴之坤, 张长芹,黄 媛,张敬丽,孙宝玲,. 长江上游玉龙雪山植物物种多样性形成的探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 48 -53 .
[6] 刘盛和. 中国城市化水平省际差异的成因探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 530 -535 .
[7] 李思悦 刘文治 顾胜 韩鸿印 张全发. null[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 275 -280 .
[8] 杨, 琳, 黄介生, 李大文, 黄志强. 控制排水条件下土壤氮素的运移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1063 .
[9] 李 彬,武 恒. 安徽省耕地资源数量变化及其对粮食安全的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1115 .
[10] 龚大洁, 吴洪超, 侯 峰, 漆朝晖. 甘肃康县棘腹蛙种群资源调查与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1162 .