青藏高原东缘典型流域生态系统#br# 服务的地形梯度效应#br# ——以岷江上游为例

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201710021

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (10): 1522-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201710021

青藏高原东缘典型流域生态系统#br# 服务的地形梯度效应#br# ——以岷江上游为例

朱昌丽1，张继飞2*，赵宇鸾1，刘春艳1

（1.贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院，贵州贵阳 550001；
2.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所，四川成都 610041）

出版日期:2017-10-20

TOPOGRAPHIC GRADIENT EFFECTS OF TYPICAL WATERSHED #br# ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE EASTERN TIBETAN PLATEAU#br# —— A CASE STUDY OF THE UPPER REACHES OF MINJIANG RIVER

ZHU Changli1, ZHANG Jifei2, ZHAO Yuluan1, LIU Chunyan1

(1.School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China；2. Institute of
Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Resources, Chengdu, Chengdu 610041, China）

Online:2017-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 山地生态系统受地形因素影响在垂向上呈现出明显的空间分异特征，厘清山地生态系统服务的空间分异特征是区域土地利用和生态系统管理的基础。以青藏高原东缘典型流域岷江上游为研究区，将2000、2005、2010年土地利用数据及DEM数据作为数据源，运用地形位指数、相对变化率和敏感性系数，研究土地利用变化下的生态系统服务价值的地形梯度效应。结果表明：（1）岷江上游土地利用类型以林地和草地为主，约占总面积的60%和30%；2000～2010年，1~4级地形位上除未利用地外的其他土地利用类型分布指数变化较为明显，林地和耕地不断降低，草地、水域和建设用地不断升高。（2 ）研究期内岷江上游生态系统服务价值总量和各类型生态系统服务的价值随地形位的升高均呈倒V形变化；2000～2010年，研究区1~12级地形位上生态系统服务价值呈增加趋势，13~20级地形位上呈减小趋势。（3）2000～2010年，各地形位上生态系统服务价值变化趋势与研究区一致；除1级地形位上生态系统服务价值变化幅度略高于研究区外，2~20级地形位上的变化幅度与研究区基本一致。（4）研究区各土地利用类型的单位面积生态系统服务价值敏感性系数均小于1，单位面积生态系统服务价值的变化缺乏弹性，研究结果可信；2000～2010年各地形位上水域、草地和荒漠敏感性系数不断上升，林地和耕地敏感性系数不断下降。通过对土地利用变化驱动下的生态系统服务价值的地形梯度效应进行定量测度，明晰了生态系统服务价值随地形梯度变化所呈现的空间分异规律及其变化特征，为保护区域
生态系统，合理利用土地资源提供理论依据。
关键词：土地利用；生态系统服务；地形位指数；地形梯度；岷江上游；青藏高原东缘

Abstract: The spatial characteristics of mountain ecosystems are affected by terrain factors. Clarifying the spatial differentiation characteristics of mountain ecosystem
services is the basis of regional land use and ecosystem management. This study took the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River (URMR) as study areas. The terrain gradient characteristics of ecosystem service value under landuse change were identified using terrain index, relative rate of change and sensitivity coefficient based on landuse data and DEM data. The results showed that: (1) The landuse types in the URMR were dominated by woodland and grassland, which accounted for 60% and 30% of the total area, respectively. During 2000 to 2010, the change of terrain index was obvious in 1- 4 terrain areas. (2) The total value of ecosystem services and the value of individual ecosystem services in the URMR showed an inverted Vshape change with the increase of topographic area. During 2000 to 2010, the ecosystem service value (ESV) increased in 1-12 terrain areas and reduced in 13-20. (3) During 2000 to 2010, the trend of ESV in each terrain was consistent with that of the study area. In 1 terrain area, the change of ESV in the topographic level was slightly higher than that of the study area. In 2-20 terrain areas, the change was nearly consistent with the study area. (4) The sensitivity coefficient of the ESV in per unit area of landuse types in the study area was less than 1 and the change of the ESV in per unit area was lack of flexibility. It showed that the results were credible. During 2000 to 2010, the sensitivity coefficient of the water, grassland and desert kept rising in each terrain area, whereas woodland and cultivated land kept declining. Based on the quantitative measurement of the terrain gradient effects of the ESV driven by landuse change, the spatial differentiation and its change of ESV with the change of terrain gradient were clarified. The results can provide the theoretical basis for protecting regional ecosystem and rational use of land resources in the future.
Key words：land use; ecosystem service; topographic index; terrain gradient; the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River; eastern edge of Tibetan plateau

朱昌丽1，张继飞2*，赵宇鸾1，刘春艳1. 青藏高原东缘典型流域生态系统#br# 服务的地形梯度效应#br# ——以岷江上游为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(10): 1522-.

ZHU Changli1, ZHANG Jifei2, ZHAO Yuluan1, LIU Chunyan1. TOPOGRAPHIC GRADIENT EFFECTS OF TYPICAL WATERSHED #br# ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE EASTERN TIBETAN PLATEAU#br# —— A CASE STUDY OF THE UPPER REACHES OF MINJIANG RIVER[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(10): 1522-.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2]	徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[3]	张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[4]	胡大伟,卞新民,许泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5]	张洁\| 张志斌\| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6]	周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7]	邹小兵,曾婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[8]	梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9]	罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10]	刘德富,黄钰铃,\| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .