Abstract: Abstract：It is important to measure the welfare level of farmers after they have withdrawn from their homesteads to achieve centralized living in the context of farmers’ differentiation, which is necessary to ensure the differential needs of farmers in the process of new urbanization. Based on the 242 survey data of farmers surveyed in Gongdao Town, Yangzhou City, which has completed the exit of the homestead in 2018, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to empirically analyze the difference in the impact of the centralized residence on the welfare level of farmers with different differentiation characteristics. The results show that: (1) The total fuzzy index of welfare after the farmers withdraw from the house site is 0.584, and the welfare status is good. The family economic status and social security status are the main factors affecting the welfare level of the farmers, endowment insurance and housing quality are the focus of attention of farmers at this stage. (2) Concentrated living has different effects on the welfare status of farmers with different differentiation characteristics. Under the characteristics of occupational differentiation, the higher the degree of differentiation of farmers, the better the welfare status; Under the characteristics of economic differentiation, the welfare level of farmers has shown a trend of “first rise and then fall”. (3) There are differences in the welfare effects of concentrated living on the functional activities of farmers with different differentiation characteristics. The higher the level of occupational differentiation and vertical economic differentiation of farmers, the better their family economic status; Occupational differentiation class I and economically differentiated low-income farmers have lower social security levels, while high-income farmers have higher compensation needs for social security; The difference in the impact of concentrated living on social opportunities, living conditions and landscape environment of various types of farmers is not significant. Therefore, local governments should fully consider the compensation needs of different types of farmers, establish a flexible welfare compensation system including social security such as pension and medical care as soon as possible, and improve the human capital of farmers to achieve sustainable livelihoods. And from the various functional activities that constitute the welfare of farmers, the various types of peasant groups are meticulously compensated, combined with the characteristics of farmers’ differentiation to promote non-agricultural employment of farmers, and meet the core urbanization needs of farmers’ employment and income.