长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (6): 1462-1472.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202006020

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

不同模式农地整治对农民生活满意度的影响差异研究 ——基于生计资本总量和结构的中介效应分析

张超正1,杨钢桥1* ,陈丹玲2   

  1. (1.华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.华中科技大学公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-07-20

Impact of Rural Land Consolidation in Different Modes on Farmers' Life Satisfaction:Mediating Effect of Quantity and Structure of Livelihood Capital

ZHANG Chao-zheng 1, YANG Gang-qiao 1, CHEN Dan-ling 2   

  1. (1. College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2. College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)
  • Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要:

Abstract:Based on the sustainable livelihoods framework, livelihood capital quantity and structure were selected as mediating variables, and then difference-in-difference model and mediation-effect model were employed to analyze the impact mechanism of rural land consolidation projects (RLCP) in different modes on farmers' life satisfaction. The result indicated that: (1) Local government-dominant mode and new agricultural management entities-dominant mode RLCP had significant positive direct effect on farmers' life satisfaction, and also had significant positive indirect effect on farmers' life satisfaction by increasing livelihood capital quantity and improving livelihood capital structure. (2) Compared with local government-dominant mode RLCP, new agricultural management entities-dominant mode RLCP had significant positive effect on farmers' life satisfaction by significantly increasing livelihood capital quantity and improving livelihood capital structure. (3) The mediating effect of livelihood capital quantity was larger than that of livelihood capital structure in local government-dominant mode RLCP, while the mediating effect of livelihood capital structure was larger than that of livelihood capital quantity in new agricultural management entities-dominant mode RLCP. (4) Winsorization approach was adopted to carry out robustness tests, which confirmed the main estimation results were considerably robust.

Abstract: 摘要: 基于可持续生计框架,选择生计资本总量和结构作为中介变量,采用“双重差分-中介效应”模型和农户调查面板数据,实证分析了不同模式农地整治对农民生活满意度的影响效应及其作用机理。结果表明:(1)地方政府主导模式和新型农业经营主体主导模式不仅对农民生活满意度具有显著的直接正向效应,而且通过增加生计资本总量和改善生计资本结构,进而对农民生活满意度产生显著的正向间接效应;(2)相比于地方政府主导模式,新型农业经营主体主导模式更能显著增加生计资本总量和改善生计资本结构,进而更能显著提升农民生活满意度;(3)地方政府主导模式通过增加生计资本总量提升农民生活满意度的作用更强,而新型农业经营经营主体主导模式通过改善生计资本结构提升农民生活满意度的作用更强;(4)通过winsorize缩尾处理进行稳健性检验,证实研究结果具有相当的稳健性。

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张落成| 刘存丽. 太湖流域土地利用变化特征与机制分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1205 .
[2] 王开然 | 贾亚男 | 胡大超. 基于15N同位素技术的地下河硝酸盐污染来源对比——以重庆青木关地下河为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 750 .
[3] 杨涛,唐川,常鸣,卜祥航,龚柯,王飞龙. 基于数值模拟的小流域泥石流危险性评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 106 .
[4] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[5] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[6] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[7] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[8] 李雪松, 龙湘雪, 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 505 -516 .
[9] 范辉. 基于推拉理论的“农二代”耕作意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 罗燊, 余斌, 张向敏. 乡村生活空间网络结构特征与优化——以江汉平原典型乡建片区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1725 -1735 .