长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (8): 1865-1873.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202008018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多层次非线性Tobit模型的集体行动对农户水土保持技术采用的影响研究

程倩,陆迁,贾彬   

  1. (西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100)
  • 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-09-21

Study on the Influence of Collective Actions on Farmers' Soil and Water Conservation Technology Based on Multi-level Nonlinear Tobit Model

CHENG Qian, LU Qian,JIA Bin   

  1. (College of Economics and Management,Northwest A & F University,Yangling 712100,China)
  • Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-09-21

摘要: 利用黄土高原区农户微观调研数据,运用多层次非线性Tobit模型实证分析了集体行动与农户水土保持技术采用之间关系的主效应和生态补偿对集体行动与农户水土保持技术采用程度之间关系的调节效应。结果表明:(1)集体行动对任何一种类型的水土保持技术均产生显著正向影响;(2)生态补偿对集体行动与农户水土保持技术采用程度之间的关系具有调节作用,但不同类型的水土保持技术,其调节作用的方向不一致,对于劳动密集型的水土保持技术具有正向调节作用,对于资本密集型的水土保持技术具有负向调节作用。基于此提出以下政策建议:增强农户的集体行动参与能力和规模、细化补偿金额和年限的标准、制定技术属性差异化的生态补偿政策等。

Abstract: Based on the micro-survey data of farmers in the Loess Plateau, this paper empirically analyzes the main effect of the relationship between collective action and farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technologies and the moderating effect of ecological compensation on the relationship between collective action and farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technologies by using a multi-level nonlinear Tobit model. The results show that: (1) collective action has a significant positive impact on any type of soil and water conservation technology; (2) Ecological compensation can adjust the relationship between collective actions and farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technologies. However, different types of soil and water conservation technologies have different adjustment directions, which have positive adjustment for labor-intensive soil and water conservation technologies and negative adjustment for capital-intensive soil and water conservation technologies. Based on this, the following policy suggestions are put forward: to enhance farmers’ ability and scale of collective action participation, to refine the standard of compensation amount and years, to formulate ecological compensation policies with differentiated technical attributes and so on.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨佳, 葛馨, 吴起鑫. 贵阳市主城区空气质量指数时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1827 .
[2] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[3] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[4] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[5] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[6] 荣欣 易桂花 张廷斌 李景吉 别小娟 覃艺 夏杰. 2000-2015年川西高原植被EVI海拔梯度变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[7] 黄烈佳 杨鹏. 2019年7期长江经济带土地生态安全时空演化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[8] 汪登强, 高雷, 段辛斌, 陈大庆, 孟秋, 刘绍平. 汉江下游鱼类早期资源及梯级联合生态调度对鱼类繁殖影响的初步分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(08): 1909 -1917 .
[9] 盖豪, 颜廷武, 何可, 张俊飚, . 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂3省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2141 -2153 .
[10] 张媛媛, 袁奋强, 刘东皇, 陈利馥. 产业生态化水平的测度及其影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(10): 2331 -2339 .