长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (8): 1885-1895.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202008020

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

资本禀赋与农户耕地保护支付意愿关系 ——基于城镇近郊区与城镇远郊区的对比分析

朱庆莹,陈银蓉* ,袁凯华,王晓妹,甘臣林   

  1. (华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-09-21

Research on the Relationship Between Capital Endowment and Farmers′ Willingness to Pay for Cultivated Land Protection:Comparing the Suburban and Outer Suburbs

ZHU Qing-ying,CHEN Ying-rong,YUAN Kai-hua,WANG Xiao-mei,GAN Chen-lin   

  1. (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-09-21

摘要: 在对资本禀赋与农户耕地保护支付意愿的关系进行文献综述并提出研究假说的基础上,基于武汉“1+8”城市圈483份农户调研数据,利用order logistic模型,实证检验两者之间的关系。结果表明:(1)有33.5%的农户愿意每月支付20元左右资金来保护耕地,整体水平偏低;城镇远郊区农户有更强的耕地生计依赖,相比于城镇近郊区,支付意愿更强。(2)从各个模型中的显著型变量来看,除经济资本中的家庭年总收入外,其余资本禀赋对耕地保护支付意愿存在显著正向影响。(3)整体上,相比于经济和文化资本,社会资本对农户耕地保护支付意愿的影响效应更强。(4)城镇近郊区和城镇远郊区农户资本禀赋对耕地保护支付意愿影响存在显著差异:相比城镇远郊区,除与亲朋邻里关系状况外,城镇近郊区其余农户资本影响效应较大;进一步分析发现,经济资本中的家庭年总收入、家庭劳动力总人数以及社会资本中在群众会议中的发言情况只对城镇近郊区农户影响效应显著;对村集体信任程度等村庄型和与亲朋邻里关系程度邻里型社会资本都对城镇远郊区农户耕地保护支付意愿产生重要影响,而城镇近郊区仅是与亲朋邻里关系程度邻里型社会资本产生效应。应积极组建各类农村合作经济组织,提升农户储蓄水平;大力发展农村教育,尤其是职业教育和继续教育;鼓励农民积极参与农村社会集体活动组织以加强农户之间、农户与村干部之间的交流;尤其加强城镇远郊区农村集体组织建设等来加强农户资本禀赋积累;进一步加强农户农业生产补贴;以此增强农户耕地保护支付意愿,促进更好的保护耕地。

Abstract: Based on the literature review and the research hypothesis of the relationship between capital endowment and farmer′s willingness to pay for the cultivated land protection,this paper used the survey data of 483 households from Wuhan“1+8”metropolitan area and employed the order logistic model to test empirically the impacts of capital endowment on the farmers′ willingness to pay for cultivated land protection.The results show that: (1)33.5% of the farmers are willing to pay around 20 Yuan to protect the cultivated land and the overall level is low; compared to suburban,the outer suburbs farmers have a stronger willingness than the farmers in suburban stronger cultivated land dependence.(2) As far as the significant variables are concerned in each model,except for the total annual household income of economic capital, the remaining capital endowments have a significant positive impact on the willingness to pay for cultivated land protection.(3)On the whole, compared with economic and cultural capital, social capital have a stronger influence on farmers′ willingness to pay for cultivated land protection.(4)There are significant differences in the impact of farmer capital endowments on the willingness to pay for cultivated land protection in suburban and outer suburbs:compared to outer suburbs,the influence of the remaining farmer capital on the willingness to pay for farmland protection is greater in suburban in addition to the relationship with relatives and friends;further analysis find that total annual household income and family laborers of economic capital and statements in mass meetings of social capital have a significant impact on the suburban farmer;while the degree of trust in village collectives of village-type and the degree of relationship with relatives and friends of neighborhood-type all have an important impact on the willingness of farmers to pay for cultivated land protection in suburban and outer suburbs,and only the degree of relationship with relatives and friends of neighborhood-type is valid in suburban.The major findings derived from the study can be summarized as follows:it is necessary to establish various rural cooperative economic organizations actively,improve the savings level of farmers;develop rural education vigorously,especially vocational education and continuing education;encourage farmers to participate in the organization of rural social collective activities actively to strengthen communication among farmers, farmers and village cadre; especially strengthen the construction of rural collective organizations in outer suburbs to improve the accumulation of capital endowment of farmers to enhance the willingness of farmers to pay for cultivated land protection,and promote cultivated land protection better.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨涵洧, 马悦, 史军. 全球变暖背景下长江三角洲夏季高温时空演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1400 .
[2] 谢启姣, 段吕晗, 汪正祥. 夏季城市景观格局对热场空间分布的影响——以武汉为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1735 .
[3] 潘方杰, 王宏志, 王璐瑶, . 湖北省湖库洪水调蓄能力及其空间分异特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1891 .
[4] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[5] 张 磊, 潘保柱, 蒋小明, 侯精明, 王 俊. 基于水文连通分析的江湖关系研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2805 -2816 .
[6] 陈磊, 姜海, 陈文宽, 贾文韬. 生态约束下的湖滨土地利用研究——以四川省仁寿县黑龙滩镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 231 -240 .
[7] 罗婷, 许文年, 程虎, 邱辉, 夏露, 赵冰琴, 夏栋, . 向家坝水电站不同修复模式下根际土壤微生物化学计量特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 450 -458 .
[8] 任亚文 曹卫东. 长江经济带三大城市群城镇化与生态环境时空耦合特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[9] 童庆蒙, 张露, 张俊飚. 土地转入能否提升农民生活满意度? ——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 614 -622 .
[10] 楚鑫磊, 李乐, 曾立雄, 黄志霖, 刘常富, 肖文发. 三峡库区建坝前后森林生态系统服务动态[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(08): 1977 -1986 .