长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (1): 11-22.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202101002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带旅游资源开发强度与生态能力耦合协调关系研究

周  颖,王兆峰*   

  1. (湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-02-04

Study on the Coupling and Coordination Relationship Between Tourism Resource Development Intensity and Ecological Capacity:A Case Study of in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

ZHOU Ying,WANG Zhao-feng   

  1. (Hunan Normal University,College of Tourism, Changsha 410081,China)
  • Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-02-04

摘要: 在国家生态文明战略的大背景下,探究旅游资源开发强度与生态能力的关系对实现旅游业可持续发展有重要意义。以长江经济带11个省市为例,根据2009~2018年统计数据,利用熵值、超效率DEA、耦合模型等研究方法深入探究旅游资源开发强度与生态能力二者关系及匹配程度,并利用GIS地理软件分析旅游资源开发强度与生态能力二者的耦合协调度空间差异性。研究发现:(1)长江经济带11个省市的旅游资源开发强度演化轨迹大体呈现“上升-下降-上升”的趋势,但在研究期间各省市旅游资源开发强度整体呈现增长态势。(2)长江经济带生态能力逐渐得到加强,其值从2009的0.692增长至2018年的1.169。(3)样本期间,旅游资源开发强度与生态能力属于极度耦合,两者存在强稳定强联系,且东部长三角板块协调度显著优于西部云贵板块协调度。长江经济带旅游资源开发强度与生态能力存在耦合协调关系,且旅游资源开发强度与生态能力二者交互发展处于高度匹配阶段,有利旅游产业可持续发展。
关键词: 旅游资源开发强度;生态能力;耦合协调;长江经济带

Abstract: Under the background of the national ecological civilization strategy, It is great significance to explore the relationship between the intensity of tourism resource development and ecological capacity for the sustainable development of tourism. Took 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an example, according to the statistical data of 2009-2018, used entropy, super-efficiency DEA, coupling model and other research methods to deeply explored the relationship between tourism development intensity and ecological capacity and the degree of matching, and used GIS geographic software analyzed the spatial heterogeneity of the coupling degree of tourism resource development intensity and ecological capacity. The research finds that: (1)The evolutionary trajectory of tourism resource development intensity in 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt generally shows the trend of “rise-down-rise”. However, during the study period, the development intensity of tourism resources in all provinces and cities showed an overall growth trend. (2)The ecological capacity of the Yangtze River Economic Belt has gradually been strengthened, and its value has increased from 0.692 in 2009 to 1.169 in 2018.(3)During the sample period, the development intensity of tourism resources and ecological capacity are extremely coupled. There is strong and stable relationship between the two, and the coordination degree of the eastern Yangtze River Delta is significantly better than that of the western Yun-Gui plate. There is a coupling and coordination relationship between the development intensity of tourism resources and ecological capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and the interactive development of tourism resources development intensity and ecological capacity is in a highly matching stage, which is conducive to the sustainable development of the tourism industry.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 军,陈振楼,许世远. 长江口滨岸带生态环境质量评价指标体系与评价模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 659 -664 .
[2] 周 静, 杨桂山, 戴胡爽. 经济发展与环境退化的动态演进——环境库兹涅茨曲线研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 414 .
[3] 郑海霞, 童菊儿, 郑朝洪, 徐 扬. 东南沿海经济发达地区耕地数量的动态变化及其驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 435 .
[4] 朱金格, 胡维平, 胡春华. 太湖沉积速率分布演化及其淤积程度健康评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 703 .
[5] 曾海鳌, 吴敬禄. 太湖洑东流域陆地侵蚀与入湖物质通量的定量关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 707 .
[6] 王圣| 王慧敏| 朱法华| 仇蕾| 陈辉| 孙雪丽. 我国火电行业NOX排放因子的样本容量确定方法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(9): 1067 .
[7] 董 阳|黄平|李勇志|刘峰|吴胜军. 三峡水库水质移动监测指标筛选方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 366 .
[8] 邹节新|汪雁|钟永亮|朱春潮|张小燕|石林波|徐武杰|张萌|李述|葛刚|周文斌|周宪民. 鄱阳湖克氏原螯虾的分布现状及其群体外部形态聚类分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 415 .
[9] 陈有明,杨 娟,疏 浅,黄 燕. 长江流域地貌约束与国土开发保护遥感研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(s): 30 .
[10] 张玲玲, 王宗志, 李晓惠, 段文武. 总量控制约束下区域用水结构调控策略及动态模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(01): 90 .