长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (7): 1433-1446.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202307007

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于eDNA宏条形码技术的上海骨干河流鱼类多样性研究

张彦彦1,唐文乔1,2*, 陈振锋1,龚珑3,唐振1,张亚1,2   

  1. (1.上海海洋大学海洋动物系统分类与进化上海高校重点实验室,上海 201306;2.水产种质资源发掘与利用省部共建教育部重点实验室,上海 201306;3.上海市生态环境局,上海 200003)
  • 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-07-21

Investigating the Fish Diversity in Backbone Rivers of Shanghai Based on Environmental DNA Matabarcoding

ZHANG Yan-yan1, TANG Wen-qiao1,2, CHEN Zhen-feng1, GONG Long3, TANG Zhen1, ZHANG Ya 1,2   

  1. (1. Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; 3. Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment, Shanghai 200003, China)
  • Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-21

摘要: 为了解淀浦河、川杨河、大治河、金汇港、龙泉港等5条上海市骨干人工河流鱼类物种多样性及群落结构状况,于2021年6月(夏季)和11月(秋季)经过水样采集、eDNA抽滤和提取、12SrRNA遗传标记扩增、高通量测序与生物信息分析等分析流程。结果显示,两次调查共从5条骨干河流的20个断面中检测到80种鱼类,排除10种因厨余废物流入河道而被检出的海洋种类,实际栖息的可能有70种,隶属于10目22科55属,包括国家Ⅱ级重点保护动物胭脂鱼(Myxocyprinus asiaticus)和5种外来物种。夏季和秋季检出鱼类分别为48种和62种,每条河流平均35.2种和44.0种。但20个断面夏季的Chao1指数和ACE指数均大于秋季均值,而Shannon指数和Simpson指数均值均小于秋季。夏、秋两季共同的优势种为刀鲚(Coilia nasus)、鲫(Carassius auratus)和鲤(Cyprinus carpio)。Jaccard相似性分析显示,断面间相似性最好的龙泉港表现为极相似,但表现最差的大治河也为中等相似。Cluster聚类和NMDS排序分析显示,5条河流可分为显著差异的3组,即龙泉港、金汇港和除Z1断面外的大治河各断面为组Ⅰ,川杨河和淀浦河各断面为组Ⅱ,Z1断面为组Ⅲ,刀鲚、鲫、大鳍鱊(Acheilognathus macropterus)是造成组间差异的主要分歧种。研究检出的鱼类物种数虽多于黄浦江干流已记录的物种数,但厨余废物流入河道也能被检出,可能存在一定的 “假阳性”现象。尽管如此,eDNA宏条形码技术仍在城市河流鱼类多样性评估方面展现良好应用前景。

Abstract: In order to understand the composition of fish species diversity and assemblage structure in the Dianpu river, Chuanyang river, Dazhi river, Jinhui river and Longquan river these 5 Shanghai backbone rivers, this paper carried out water collection, eDNA filtration and extraction, 12SrRNA genetic marker amplification, high-throughput sequencing, bioinformatic analysis and other analysis processes in June (summer) and November (autumn) of 2021.The results showed that a total of 80 fish species were detected in 20 sections of 5 backbone rivers during the two surveys. Excluding 10 marine species that were detected due to kitchen waste flowing into rivers, 70 species might actually inhabit, belonging to 10 orders, 22 families and 55 genera. Including 1 species of second-class state protected fish-Myxocyprinus asiaticus and 5 invasive species. 48 and 62 fish species were detected in summer and autumn respectively, with an average of 35.2 and 44.0 species per river. Howerver, Chao1 index and ACE index of 20 sections in summer were higher than the average in autumn, while the mean values of Shannon index and Simpson index in summer were lower than those in autumn. The common dominant species in summer and autumn were Coilia nasus, Carassius auratus and Cyprinus carpio. Jaccard similarity analysis showed that Longquan river with the best similarity between sections was very similar, but the Dazhi river with the worst similarity was also medium similar. Cluster analysis and NMDS sequencing analysis showed that the 5 backbone rivers could be divided into 3 groups with extremely significant discrepancies. The Longquan river, Jinhui river and Dazhi river sections excluding Z1 were group Ⅰ, the sections of  the Chuanyang river and Dianpu river were Ⅱ, and Z1 section was Group Ⅲ. Coilia nasus, Carassius auratus and Acheilognathus macropterus were the main discriminating species causing the differences among the three groups. Although the number of fish species detected in this study was higher than that recorded in the main stream of the Huangpu River, food waste flowing into the river could also be detected, which might have some “false positive” phenomenon. Nevertheless, the eDNA matabarcoding technology still shows good application prospects in the assessment of fish diversity in urban rivers.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[2] 张梦薇, 吕成文. 丰乐河流域表层土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1420 .
[3] 韦汝虹, 金 李, 方 达. 基于GIS的中国城市房地产泡沫的空间传染性分析——以2006~2014年35个大中城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1967 -1977 .
[4] 张丽琴, 渠丽萍, 吕春艳, 李 玲. 基于空间格局视角的武汉市土地生态系统服务价值研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1988 -1997 .
[5] 田雨 周宝同 付伟 王蓉. 2000-2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究—以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 张文婷. 江西省不同地貌单元耕地土壤有机碳空间变异的尺度效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2619 -2628 .
[7] 曾源源, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进, . 长江中游经济带交通区位条件变化与建设用地扩张时空耦合规律[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2651 -2662 .
[8] 梁辉 王春凯. 201904产业发展对城市蔓延影响的差异性分析—以长江经济带104个城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 杨远琴, 任 平, 洪步庭, . 基于生态安全的三峡库区重庆段土地利用冲突识别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 322 -332 .
[10] 王 倩, 王云琦, 马 超, 王 彬, 李一凡. 缙云山针阔混交林碳通量变化特征及影响因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 565 -576 .