长江流域资源与环境 >> 2004, Vol. 13 >> Issue (1): 18-23.

• 资源环境与社会经济可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

石林风景名胜区对乡村经济发展的影响

李玉辉(1),李忠德(2),张丹丹(1),李兆林(1) ,周顺吉(1)   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 李玉辉

EFFECT OF TOURISM INDUSTRY ON RURAL ECONOMY IN THE YUNNAN SHILIN NATIONAL PARK

LI Yu-hui(1), LI Zhong-de(2), ZHANG Dan-dan(1), LI Zhao-lin(1), ZHOU Shun-ji(1)   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-01-20
  • Contact: LI Yu-hui

摘要: 石林风景名胜区始建于20世纪30年代,旅游开发经历了居民游览、服务中心城市的接待观光型到区域支柱产业的转型。经济体制深刻地影响了石林旅游业,旅游产品延续了计划经济体制下形成接待观光游览型,形成以门票收入为主体的旅游经济收入格局,对不同层次的经济发展带来不同的影响。石林旅游业对县级经济收入、产业结构、财政、税收有积极影响,近5年石林旅游业占当地GDP的9%~11%,占第三产业产值的27.9% ~33%、财政收入的10.8%~0.1%,但对农业生产、农村居民就业和家庭收入的带动力弱,有明显的“距离衰减效应”。获得旅游效益的居民限于风景区旅游中心的村寨,约占风景区人口的15%,中心旅游区的第三产业就业人员比例比其它地区高7%~35%。中心区农民参与旅游业方式的调查表明,居民参与旅游业的方式被动:耕地被征用后,或被风景名胜区管理部门雇佣、或成个体工商户、或被外来企业雇佣,就业领域局限于餐饮服务、环卫和绿化、民族工艺品制作与销售、照相、旅游交通、导游等。风景区农村的基础建设、产业结构、就业领域与风景区功能和旅游业目标的协调存在距离。促进风景名胜区旅游业对所在地的“三农”发展的协调值得思考和解决。

关键词: 石林风景名胜区, 旅游业, 乡村经济

Abstract: The Shilin scenery and historical Spots (lately known as the Shilin national park) was founded firstly in 1930s.The development of the Shilin karst landscape resources with local ethnic cultural resourc es in the Park experienced from as a local sight-seeing place, through an excursion destination serving for the central city, to the basis of the regional pillar industry of both Shilin Yi autonomous County and Kunming city. An economic system has affected the Shilin tourism industry. The products of the Shilin tourism industry are mainly to host the sight-seeing tourists under the planned system,and the main parts of the Shilin tourism income are from the tourist tickets, which gives out different effects on various levels of the economy in the county. The Shilin tourism economy brings a positive effect on the county-level economic structure, industrial adjustment, state fiscal levy and governmental revenue. In the last 5 years, the income from the Shilin tourism averagely makes up 9%~11% of annual GDP, 27.9%~33% of the third industryincome, 10.8%~40.1% fiscal levy. However, the development of the Shilin tourism did not produce significant effects on local agriculture, employment of rural citizens and family revenue here compared to effects on the county-level economy, and then the positive effects from the Shilin tourism reduce with distance increment away from the tourist centre in the Park. The rural citizens who receive economic interests of the Shilin tourism are limited within the villages located at the sight-seeing centre of the Park and only 15% of population of the Park. The percentage of rural citizens working in the third industry in the tourism centre of the Park is 7%~35% higher than in other places. The results from the investigation of working fields of the villager s in the local tourism industry show that the local villagers are not actively involved in the tourism industry, and the common situations for them are that most of them are employed by the administration of the Shilin Park after their farming lands were expropriated, and some become individual operators and some are employed by outside employers who operate tourism enterprises in the Park. Their working fields mainly are in food-beverage service, environmental sanitation, tree planting, making and selling local ethnic arts as well as tourist transportation and tourist guide. It is proposed, that more efforts should be made in developing rural economy by improving the coordination of village infrastructure, agriculture and rural citizens` employment with the tourism industry of the Shilin Park.

Key words: Shilin scenery and historical spot, tourist industry, rural economy

[1] 聂钠, 于坤香. 我国世界自然遗产地旅游业环境经济核算思路[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 121-.
[2] 邓宏兵,|刘 芬,庄 军. 中国旅游业空间集聚与集群化发展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 289-289.
[3] 张颖,钟全林,唐承财. 我国大陆区域旅游业发展优势的动态比较[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 22-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许峰, 祁士华, 高媛, 邢新丽. 绵阳市代表性点位土壤多环芳烃剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 192 .
[2] 陶建平,雷海章. 长江中游平原农业水灾风险管理的制度建设[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 621 -625 .
[3] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[4] 王红丽,| 刘 健 | 况雪源. 四种再分析资料与长江中下游地区降水观测资料的对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 703 .
[5] 王云琦,王玉杰,朱金兆. 重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 775 -780 .
[6] 常青山,马祥庆,王志勇. 南方重金属矿区重金属的污染特征及评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 395 .
[7] 张林, 王礼茂, 王睿博,. 长江中上游防护林体系森林植被碳贮量及固碳潜力估算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 111 .
[8] 周 静, 杨桂山, 戴胡爽. 经济发展与环境退化的动态演进——环境库兹涅茨曲线研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 414 .
[9] 曹 昀,王国祥. 水生高等植物对悬浮泥沙的去除研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 340 .
[10] 谢春花,王克林,陈洪松,张明阳. 土地利用变化对洞庭湖区生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 191 -195 .