长江流域资源与环境 >> 2008, Vol. 17 >> Issue (6): 939-939.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

河流生态用水综合评价

黄〓强1| 张泽中1| 李〓群1|2,王义民1| 齐青青1   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-11-20

INTEGRATION EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENT WATER USE IN RIVER

HUANG Qiang1| ZHANG Zezhong1| LI Qun1|2| WANG Yimin1| QI Qingqing1   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-11-20

摘要:

为完善河流生态用水综合评价,从水循环中河流生态用水角度出发,以河流水量收支平衡规律为理论基础,考虑河流本底水质,采用本底水质、排放水质和河流控制目标污染物浓度表达河流生态新污径比,并推导出污水排放允许极限值,深入探讨了河流生态用水的质与量综合评价,改进了二元循环下河流生态用水的水量水质计算方法和河流生态用水的综合评价新标准,进一步完善了河流生态用水质与量综合评价模型。用此模型对黄河2002~2005年为例进行实力分析,结果表明:①在污水一级达标排放和不调水情况下,黄河生态用水水量比例在335%~545%,在Tennant等级中为较好状态,但水质不满足要求,bo>Blim;②在污水深度处理达到95 mg/L(COD),不调水情况下,黄河生态用水质与量满足生态环境需水要求,综合评价合格;③在污水一级达标排放和南水北调调水40亿m3情况下,黄河生态用水水量比例有较大提高,综合评价合格。这说明,黄河生态用水问题不仅是水量短缺,而且水质问题更加严重。

关键词: 生态用水, 综合评价, 二元水循环, 新污径比, 水质, 水量, 黄河

Abstract:

In order to perfect the method of integration evaluation of environment water use in river,the new dilution ratio was established with the river water contamination,waste water contamination,the control contamination and the sewage discharge limit permit value were introduced based on the law of inout river water cycle from aspect of environment water use in the river.The quality and quantity integration evaluation of river environment water use was further discussed and the water quantity and water quality calculation method of environment water use in dualistic water cycle was improved and the criteria for environment water use were reestablished.The model of quality and quantity integration evaluation of river ecoenvironment water use was perfected.Taking the Yellow River from 2002 to 2005 as demonstration,the new integration evaluation model was applied.Results showed as followings: Firstly,the environment water use ratio is 33.5%~54.5%,which is at the “good” in Tennant levels,but the quality state does not meet with the environment demand,when the sewage was the stair eligible disposed and discharged and no water was transferred.Secondly,when the sewage deepen disposal reduced COD contamination to 95mg/L,when no water was transferred,the environment use water in the Yellow River met with the environment demand water in the quality and quantity and the integration evaluation was good.Thirdly,the environment use water ratio was much more increased,and the integration evaluation is good,when the sewage was the stair eligible disposed and from SouthtoNorth 4 billion cubic meters water was transferred.The study has discovered that the quantity lack and the quality worse is the main question of environment use water in the Yellow River.

Key words: environment water use, integration evaluation, dualistic water cycle, new dilution ratio, water quality, the Yellow River

[1] 杨洋, 张玮, 潘宏博, 顾琬雯, 郝瑞娟, 熊春晖, 王丽卿. 滆湖轮虫群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 832-840.
[2] 卓海华, 吴云丽, 刘旻璇, 郑红艳, 兰静. 三峡水库水质变化趋势研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 925-936.
[3] 杨超杰, 贺斌, 段伟利, 李冰, 陈雯, 杨桂山. 太湖典型丘陵水源地水质时空变化及影响因素分析——以平桥河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 273-281.
[4] 李冰, 杨桂山, 万荣荣, 刘宝贵, 戴雪, 许晨. 鄱阳湖出流水质2004~2014年变化及其对水位变化的响应:对水质监测频率的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 289-296.
[5] 王秀, 王振祥, 潘宝, 周春财, 刘桂建. 南淝河表层水中重金属空间分布、污染评价及来源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 297-303.
[6] 李文浩, 张萌, 门吉帅, 敖雪夫, 胡新艳, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 江西仙女湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1218-1227.
[7] 闫思宇, 王景燕, 龚伟, 罗建跃, 苏黎明, 舒正悦, 赵昌平, 蔡煜. 川南山地林分变化对土壤物理性质和抗蚀性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1112-1120.
[8] 史超, 夏军, 佘敦先, 万蕙, 黄金凤. 气候变化下汉江上游林地植被生态需水量的时空演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 580-589.
[9] 邹刚华, 李勇, 彭佩钦. 中亚热带红壤区不同土地利用土壤田间持水量估测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 234-238.
[10] 赵敏, 张丽旭. 长江口海域表层沉积物环境质量的综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 284-291.
[11] 彭俊翔, 伍永年, 胡维平, 邓建才. 长荡湖近61a降水量演化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 292-299.
[12] 龚直文, 王广儒, 顾丽. 陕西省油松混交林木质残体储量与腐烂特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 326-333.
[13] 焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 李文华, Anthony M. Fuller. 基于ESEF的水生态承载力评估——以太湖流域湖州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 147-155.
[14] 王琦, 欧伏平, 张雷, 卢少勇. 三峡工程运行后洞庭湖水环境变化及影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1843-1849.
[15] 张雷, 鲁春霞, 李江苏. 中国大河流域开发与国家文明发育[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1639-1645.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!