长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (05): 708-714.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201605003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于最低成本-周期模型的昆明市空间形态演变研究

李在军1,2,3, 张雅倩1,2,3, 胡美娟1,2,3, 马志飞1,2,3, 吴启焰1,2,3   

  1. 1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院, 江苏 南京 210023;
    2. 北部湾可持续发展监测与优化教育部重点实验室, 广西 南宁 530001;
    3. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心, 江苏 南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-01 修回日期:2015-09-16 出版日期:2016-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 吴启焰 E-mail:chiyanwu@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:李在军(1989~),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为城市地理与区域经济发展.E-mail:junzailinyi@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41271176)

THE MINIMUM COST-CYCLE GROWTH MODEL OF URBAN SPATIAL MORPHOLOGY:A CASE OF KUNMING IN CHINA

LI Zai-jun1,2,3, ZHANG Ya-qian1,2,3, HU Mei-juan1,2,3, MA Zhi-fei1,2,3, WU Qi-yan1,2,3   

  1. 1. School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf (Ministry of Education), Nanning 530001, China;
    3. Jiangsu Center for Collabortive Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjng 210023, China
  • Received:2015-08-01 Revised:2015-09-16 Online:2016-05-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271176)

摘要: 在政治经济学背景下,由于政府力量和市场力量相互交融,城市形态演化遵循一定的周期性演变规律。基于1909~2008年间昆明市历史阶段的形态演化资料,运用参与式照片、R指数及高密度填充指数与低密度扩张指数分析了昆明市城市形态演化的周期性规律。结果表明,从理性的微观过程或个体行为及宏观过程或城市实践来看,城市形态演化包含了最低成本周期扩张模型,即低密度的扩张与高密度的填充;低密度的扩张由政府主导的基础设施建设投资所引导,而高密度的回填运动由集体与理性的个体企业所引发,故城市形态的宏观演化,是它本身的内在法则与外部机制的统一体。这一结果有助于解释更多有关土地使用及土地管理的信息,将帮助我们进行规划未来的城市发展。

关键词: 城市形态, 最低成本-周期模型, 低密度扩张, 高密度填充, 昆明市

Abstract: In the context of political economy, the forces from government and market are reciprocal, resulting in the periodic evolution of urban morphology. Based on historical phases of urban morphological evolution of the Kunming Metropolis from 1909 to 2008, we found that:(1) from the view of the rational micro-process or individual behavior and macro-process or urbanization practice, the evolution of urban morphology follows a Minimum Cost-Cyclic Growth model (MCCG), presenting a cycle of a dual phase of expansion, low density based expanding versus high density base infilling; (2) The MCCG model is periodically and reciprocally derived by a set of vis-à-vis dualistic dynamic, in which low density expansion pattern is led by state based pro-growth infrastructure investment, while the high density infilling movement is activated by collective and rational action of individual enterprise/economic behaviors.

Key words: urban morphology, Minimum Cost-Cycle Growth Model, low density based expanding, high density base infilling, Kunming

中图分类号: 

  • F291
[1] BARBOZA D. China passes Japan as second-largest economy[N]. The New York Times, 2010-08-15.
[2] SMITH N. Uneven development redux[J]. New Political Economy, 2011, 16(2):261-265.
[3] HARVEY D. A brief history of neoliberalism[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005.
[4] SETO K C, FRAGKIAS M, GÜNERALP B, et al. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(8):e23777.
[5] JIANG B, CLARAMUNT C. Integration of space syntax into GIS:new perspectives for urban morphology[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2002, 6(3):295-309.
[6] LI Z, YAN H, AI T, et al. Automated building generalization based on urban morphology and Gestalt theory[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2004, 18(5):513-534.
[7] SCHNEIDER A, WOODCOCK C E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information[J]. Urban Studies, 2008, 45(3):659-692.
[8] YEH A G O. Dual land market and internal spatial structure of Chinese cities[M]//MA L J C, WU F L. Restructuring the Chinese City:Changing Society, Economy and Space. London:Routledge, 2005.
[9] YUE W Z, LIU Y, FAN P L. Measuring urban sprawl and its drivers in large Chinese cities:the case of Hangzhou[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31:358-370.
[10] LICHTENBERG E, DING C R. Local officials as land developers:urban spatial expansion in China[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2009, 66(1):57-64.
[11] CHO S C, CHOI P P. Introducing property tax in China as an alternative financing source[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 38, 580-586.
[12] 陈彦光, 刘继生. 城市形态边界维数与常用空间测度的关系[J]. 东北师范大学(自然科学版), 2006, 38(2):126-131. [CHEN Y G, LIU J S. Fractal measurement of urban boundaries and compactness or circularity ratios of cities[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Nature Science Edition), 2006, 38(2):126-131.]
[13] 姜世国, 周一星. 北京城市形态的分形集聚特征及其实践意义[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(2):204-212. [JIANG S G, ZHOU Y X. The fractal urban form of Beijing and its practical significance[J]. Geographical Research, 2006, 25(2):204-212.]
[14] 段瑞兰, 郑新奇. 基于空间句法的城市道路结构与地价关系研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2004,29(5):76-79. [DUAN R L, ZHENG X Q. The relation of the city road structure and the land price based on the space syntax[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2004, 29(5):76-79.]
[15] 周成虎, 孙战利, 谢一春. 地理元胞自动机研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1999.
[16] 黎 夏, 杨青生, 刘小平. 基于CA的城市演变的知识挖掘及规划情景模拟[J]. 中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2007, 37(9):1242-1251. [LI X, YANG Q S, LIU X P. Genetic algorithms for determining the parameters of cellular automata in urban simulation[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2007, 50(12):1857-1866.]
[17] 赵耀龙, 张 珂, 彭永俊, 等. 基于地理模拟方法的昆明市空间拓展情景分析[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(1):119-131. [ZHAO Y L, ZHANG K, PENG Y J, et al. Scenario analysis of urban growth in Kunming based on geosimulation system[J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(1):119-131.]
[18] BRUECKNER J K, FANSLER D A. The economics of urban sprawl:theory and evidence on the spatial sizes of cities[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1983, 65(3):479-482.
[19] SQUIRES G D. Urban sprawl:causes, consequences, and policy responses[M]. Washington:Urban Instiute Press, 2002.
[20] EWING R, MEAKINS G, HAMIDI S, et al. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity-Update and refinement[J]. Health & Place, 2014, 26:118-126.
[21] 吴启焰, 陈 辉, BELINDA W, 等. 城市空间形态的最低成本-周期扩张规律——以昆明为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3):484-494. [WU Q Y, CHEN H, BELINDA W, et al. The minimum cost-cycle expansion law of urban spatial morphology:a case study of Kunming in China[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(3):484-494.]
[22] DENNIS S F Jr, GAULOCHER S, CARPIANO R M, et al. Participatory photo mapping (PPM):exploring an integrated method for health and place research with young people[J]. Health & Place, 2009, 15(2):466-473.
[23] SUN C, WU Z F, LV Z Q, et al. Quantifying different types of urban growth and the change dynamic in Guangzhou using multi-temporal remote sensing data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2013, 21:409-417.
[24] ESHERICK J W, PICKOWICZ P G, WALDER A G. The Chinese cultural revolution as history[M]. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 2006.
[25] NAUGHTON B. The third front:defence industrialization in the Chinese interior[J]. The China Quarterly, 1988, (115):351-386.
[26] MILLS B M, ROSENTRAUB M S. Hosting mega-events:A guide to the evaluation of development effects in integrated metropolitan regions[J]. Tourism Management, 2013, 34:238-246.
[1] 杨立国, 周国华. 怀化城市形态的演变特征及形成机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 237-243.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孟爱云, 濮励杰. 区域耕地数量变化与工业化、城市化进程相互关系探讨——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 237 .
[2] 田晓四, 陈 杰,朱 诚,朱同林. 南京市经济增长与工业“三废”污染水平计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 410 .
[3] 贾泽露,. GIS与SDM集成构建土地定级专家信息系统的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 323 .
[4] 胥 晓|郑伯川|陈友军. 嘉陵江流域植被景观的空间格局特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 373 .
[5] 谢 洪,钟敦伦,李 泳,韦方强. 长江上游泥石流灾害的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 94 -99 .
[6] 崔 鸿, 汪 亮,. 略论我国长江渔业资源的法律保护[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 58 -60 .
[7] 徐慧娟,黎育红,孙燕. 长江宜昌水文站流量、含沙量和悬移质粒度关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 110 -115 .
[8] 张信宝,曹植菁, 艾南山. 溪洛渡水电工程拦沙对三峡水库富营养化潜在影响的初步研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 170 .
[9] 邓志强,任淑花. 长株潭地区经济增长与工业污染变迁的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 517 .
[10] 胡海胜,郑艳萍. 庐山研究的文献分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 66 -71 .