生计资本异质对农户农地流转行为的影响——以武汉城市郊区的516户农民为例

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201702007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以武汉市城郊江夏区和蔡甸区的516户农民家庭为实证，运用logistic和分位数回归模型探索家庭生计资本对农户土地流转行为的影响及阈值。结果表明：（1）人力资本和金融资本与农户农地转出行为呈显著正向相关，家庭农地资源禀赋、机耕能力、社会资源禀赋及经营能力的信任程度等与农地转出行为负向相关。相反，自然资源禀赋及农业机械投入对农户土地转入行为的正向影响显著，而家庭融资能力则对农户转入行为呈显著的负向影响。（2）分位数回归结果显示，对农户土地流转行为存在影响阈值的仅有韧性指数。当农户家庭韧性指数≤2时，随韧性指数增强农户农地转出倾向愈强；家庭韧性指数≥3时，农户农地转出倾向随指数增强而弱化。该研究从农户微观个体视角探索生计资本异质对农地流转行为的影响，为针对农户家庭需求制定差别化的农地流转政策、有效推进农业适度规模经营提供建议参考。

关键词: 农地流转行为, 生计资本, 分位数回归模型, 影响阈值, 生计策略

Abstract: Based on the data collected from 516 farm households in Jiangxia District and Caidian District of Wuhan suburb, this paper first analyzed the influence of livelihood capital on farm household land transfer behavior with the Logistic Model, and then Quantile Regression Model was adopted to explore the threshold of resource endowment about farm household land transfer. The results showed that:(1) Human capital and financial capital had a significant positive correlation with the household outward transferring behavior, while the farmland resource endowment, the quantity of agricultural machinery, the social resource endowment and the confidence level about farmland management capacity had a negative correlation with it. Instead, the natural resource endowment and the quantity of agricultural machinery had a significant positive correlation with the household inward transferring behavior, but the financing capacity had a negative correlation with it. (2) The quantile regression results showed that, only the toughness index had a threshold towards the farm household land transfer behavior. When the toughness index of household was less than or equal to 2, with the increase of the toughness index, the tendency of household outward transferring was becoming stronger. But when the toughness index reached 3 and above, the tendency of household outward transferring decreased along with the increase of the toughness index. This study provided a reference for making differentiated farmland transfer policy aiming at diverse rural household demands and effectively promoting the moderate scale management of agriculture by exploring the influence of heterogeneity of livelihood capital on farmland transfer behavior from the microcosmic individual perspective.

Key words: land transfer behavior, livelihood capital, quantile regression model, threshold, livelihood strategy

中图分类号:

F301.2

纪红蕾, 蔡银莺. 生计资本异质对农户农地流转行为的影响——以武汉城市郊区的516户农民为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 220-226.

JI Hong-lei, CAI Yin-ying. INFLUENCE OF HETEROGENEOUS LIVELIHOOD CAPITAL ON FARM HOUSEHOLDS' LAND TRANSFER BEHAVIOR——A CASE STUDY OF 516 RESPONDENTS IN WUHAN SUBURB[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(02): 220-226.

参考文献

[1] 何京蓉, 李炯光. 农村土地流转状况调查与分析——基于三峡库区7个乡镇23个村的调查[J]. 经济问题探索, 2010(3):163-167.
[2] 郭嘉, 吕世辰. 土地流转影响因素实证研究[J]. 经济问题, 2010(6):68-70, 74.[GUO J, LV S C. An empirical study of land circulation factors[J]. On Economic Problems, 2010(6):68-70, 74.]
[3] 倪国华, 蔡昉. 农户究竟需要多大的农地经营规模?——农地经营规模决策图谱研究[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(3):159-171.[NI G H, CAI F. What is the proper land management scale really needed by farmers?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50(3):159-171.]
[4] 卞琦娟, 周曙东, 葛继红. 发达地区农地流转影响因素分析——基于浙江省农户样本数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2010(6):28-36.
[5] 冯艳芬, 董玉祥, 刘毅华, 等. 基于农户调查的大城市郊区农地流转特征及影响因素研究——以广州市番禺区467户调查为例[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(7):1379-1386.[FENG Y F, DONG Y X, LIU Y H, et al. A study on farmland circulation characteristic and its influencing factors based on a household survey in metropolitan suburbs:a case on Panyu district, Guangzhou City[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(7):1379-1386.]
[6] 许恒周, 郭忠兴. 农村土地流转影响因素的理论与实证研究——基于农民阶层分化与产权偏好的视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(3):94-98.[XU H Z, GUO Z X. Theoretic and empirical research on influential factors of rural land transfer based on the perspective of hierarchy differentiation and property rights preference[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(3):94-98.]
[7] DEININGER K, JIN S Q, NAGARAJAN H K. Efficiency and equity impacts of rural land rental restrictions:evidence from India[J]. European Economic Review, 2008, 52(5):892-918.
[8] BERT F, NORTH M, ROVERE S, et al. Simulating agricultural land rental markets by combining agent-based models with traditional economics concepts:the case of the argentine pampas[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2015, 71:97-110.
[9] VRANKEN L, SWINNEN J. Land rental markets in transition:theory and evidence from Hungary[J]. World Development, 2006, 34(3):481-500.
[10] RAHMAN S. Determinants of agricultural land rental market transactions in Bangladesh[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(3):957-964.
[11] 李广东, 邱道持, 王利平, 等. 生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响——渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(4):504-515.[LI G D, QIU D C, WANG L P, et al. Impacts of difference among livelihood assets on the choice of economic compensation pattern for farmer households farmland protection in Chongqing City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(4):504-515.]
[12] 赵雪雁, 李巍, 杨培涛, 等. 生计资本对甘南高原农牧民生计活动的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(4):111-118.[ZHAO X Y, LI W, YANG P T, et al. Impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood activities of farmers and herdsmen on Gannan Plateau[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(4):111-118.]
[13] 王利平, 王成, 李晓庆. 基于生计资产量化的农户分化研究——以重庆市沙坪坝区白林村471户农户为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(5):945-954.[WANG L P, WANG C, LI X Q. Research on rural household differentiation based on the quantification of livelihood assets:evidence from 471 rural households in Bailin village, Shapingba district, Chongqing City[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(5):945-954.]
[14] 杨云彦, 赵锋. 可持续生计分析框架下农户生计资本的调查与分析——以南水北调(中线)工程库区为例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2009(3):58-65.[YANG Y Y, ZHAO F. A survey of farmers' livelihood capital in the framework of the sustainable livelihood approach:a case study of the reservoir zone of the south-to-north water transfer (middle line) project[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2009(3):58-65.]
[15] 江进德, 赵雪雁, 张丽, 等. 农户对替代生计的选择及其影响因素分析——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4):552-564.[JIANG J D, ZHAO X Y, ZHANG L, et al. Study on alternative livelihood choice and the factors affecting livelihoods choice:a case of the Yellow River water supply area of Gannan[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(4):552-564.]
[16] 苏芳, 蒲欣冬, 徐中民, 等. 生计资本与生计策略关系研究——以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(6):119-125.[SU F, PU X D, XU Z M, et al. Analysis about the relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategies:take Ganzhou in Zhangye city as a example[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(6):119-125.]
[17] 卢新海, 望萌. 农用地流转的武汉模式研究——基于武汉农村综合产权交易所的启示[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2014, 13(3):244-251.[LU X H, WANG M. Circulation model of agricultural land in Wuhan——a study based on Wuhan integrated rural property rights exchange[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2014, 13(3):244-251.]
[18] CARR E R, MCCUSKER B. The co-production of land use and livelihoods change:implications for development interventions[J]. Geoforum, 2009, 40(4):568-579.
[19] 李翠珍, 徐建春, 孔祥斌. 大都市郊区农户生计多样化及对土地利用的影响——以北京市大兴区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(6):1039-1049.[LI C Z, XU J C, KONG X B. Farm household livelihood diversity and land use in suburban areas of the metropolis:the case study of Daxing District, Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(6):1039-1049.]
[20] 宋辉, 钟涨宝. 基于农户行为的农地流转实证研究——以湖北省襄阳市312户农户为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(5):943-949.[SONG H, ZHONG Z B. An empirical study of farmland circulation based on household surveys[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(5):943-949.]
[21] 王麒麟, 根锁, 鬼木俊次. 土地租赁行为的实证分析[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 9(4):45-47.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed