长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (12): 2682-2692.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202212012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江口浑浊带至口外海滨输沙变化研究

张迨,何青*,谢卫明,郭磊城,林建良   

  1. (华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室,上海 200241)
  • 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-13

Study on the Changes of Sediment Transport of the Zone from Changjiang Estuary Turbidity Maximum to Offshore Region

ZHANG Dai, HE Qing, XIE Wei-ming, GUO Lei-cheng, LIN Jiang-liang   

  1. (State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
  • Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-13

摘要: 长江口浑浊带至口外海滨区是流域来沙“源汇转换”的主要区域,研究大通站减沙70%背景下区域含沙量及悬沙通量变化具有重要意义。基于1982与2013年洪枯季大小潮水沙现场观测数据开展研究,主要取得以下认识:(1)因流域来沙显著减小,与1982年相比,2013年枯季大小潮以及洪季小潮的垂线平均含沙量和潮周期悬沙通量均分别减小40%与25%;(2)受河口航道整治与围垦等工程影响,局部区域水动力条件增强,成为2013年洪季大潮期间,北槽与南槽垂线平均含沙量与潮周期悬沙通量分别增大80%与114%的重要原因;(3)源汇转换表现为2013年洪季南汇近岸区域向口内输送为主的泥沙较1982年增加101%,该部分泥沙成为南北槽输沙循环重要组成部分。研究成果对定量评估流域减沙与局地工程在河口区的响应程度具有重要意义。

Abstract: The zone from Changjiang Estuary Turbidity Maximum to offshore region is the main area of “source-sink transition” for fluvial sediment. It is of great significance to study the changes of regional suspended sediment concentration (SSC) and suspended sediment flux under the background of 70% fluvial sediment reduction at Datong Station. This paper analyzes the measured data based on the spring and neap tidal water and sediment observation data in the flood and dry seasons in 1982 and 2013, and mainly obtains the following insights: (1) Compared with 1982, due to the significant decrease of fluvial sediment, the vertical average SSC and the suspended sediment flux during the spring and neap tides in the dry season and the neap tides in the flood season in 2013 decreased by 40% and 25% respectively; (2) Affected by projects such as estuary waterway improvement and reclamation, the hydrodynamic conditions in local areas have been enhanced, it became an important reason for the increase of 80% and 114% in the vertical average SSC and suspended sediment flux in the North Passage and the South Passage during the spring tides in 2013 flood season; (3) The source-sink transition is manifested in the fact that in the flood season in 2013, the sediment mainly transported into the estuary from the Nanhui nearshore area increased by 101% compared with 1982, and this part of the sediment became an important part of the sediment transport cycle in the North and South Channel. The research results are of great significance for quantitatively evaluating the response of fluvial sediment reduction and local engineering in the estuary area.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[2] 奚世军 安裕伦 李阳兵 蔡沛伶 李瑞 龙立美 陈啟英. 基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估 ——以贵州省乌江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 张亚飞 廖和平 李义龙. 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[5] 秦立 吴起鑫. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[7] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[8] 袁凯华, 张 苗, 甘臣林, 陈银蓉, 朱庆莹, 杨慧琳. 基于碳减排目标的省域碳生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 21 -29 .
[9] 李雪松, 龙湘雪, 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 505 -516 .
[10] 孔春芳, 岳永财, 徐凯, . 2000~2015年江汉平原区域植被NPP时空特征及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1460 -1469 .