长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (7): 1521-1530.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202307015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

云南金沙江流域城市建成区核心度与人居自然环境质量耦合关系分析

鄢垚,夏既胜*,王宇彤   

  1. (云南大学地球科学学院,云南 昆明 650500)
  • 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-07-21

Analysis on the Coupling Relationship Between the Core Degreeof Urban Built-up Area  and the Quality of Natural Environment of Human Habitation in Jinsha River Basin, Yunnan

YAN Yao, XIA Ji-sheng, WANG Yu-tong    

  1. (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China)
  • Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-21

摘要: 人居自然环境是人们生产生活的生态基础,城市建城区空间分布及其核心程度可以反映城市发展的规模及趋势,探究二者之间的耦合关系,有助于促进城市发展与环境保护同步协调。基于云南金沙江流域2010、2015、2020年的遥感影像和其他多源数据,从城市与自然协调可持续的角度,采用多指数融合计算城市核心度指数、多方法组合计算人居自然环境质量指数。通过阈值分割提取城市建成区核心度指数,进一步构建城市建成区核心度与人居自然环境质量的耦合协调度模型,计算二者的耦合协调度和发展差异度,将流域内城市建成区划分为9种类型,从时间和空间两个维度揭示其分异规律。结果表明:(1)流域城市核心度指数整体呈轻微下降趋势,核心度高值范围随时间逐渐扩大;人居自然环境质量指数缓慢上升,尤其是滇中地区表现明显。(2)城市建成区核心度与人居自然环境质量具有较强的空间关联度,历年耦合程度均高于0.8,表现为相互干预的耦合共同体。(3)二者的耦合协调度表现为:核心城区>边缘城区,南部城市>北部城市、中部城市>东西部城市,呈现出“中间高,四周低”的分布格局;总体协调度略有下降,高度协调范围随时间明显扩大。(4)地区自然、资源以及政策等因素的差异,影响了城市发展与生态环境之间的平衡关系,使得流域城市主要出现5种耦合协调发展类型。研究成果为流域内城市建成区合理发展和自然环境保护提供科学依据,得出的城市核心度指数和人居自然环境质量指数模型为开展类似研究提供参考。


Abstract: The natural environment of human settlements is the ecological basis of people’s production and life. The spatial distribution and core degree of urban built-up areas can reflect the scale and trend of urban development. Exploring the coupling relationship between the two will help promote the simultaneous coordination of urban development and environmental protection. Based on the remote sensing images and other multi-source data of Jinsha River Basin in Yunnan Province in 2010,2015 and 2020, from the perspective of coordinated and sustainable development of city and nature, the urban coreness index is calculated by multi-index fusion, and the human settlements’ natural environment quality index is calculated by multi-method combination. The core degree index of urban built-up area is extracted by threshold segmentation, and the coupling coordination degree model between the core degree of urban built-up area and the quality of human settlements natural environment is further constructed. The coupling coordination degree and development difference degree of the two are calculated. The urban built-up areas in the basin are divided into nine types, and their differentiation rules are revealed from the two dimensions of time and space. The results show that:(1) The coreness index of watershed cities shows a slight downward trend as a whole, and the high-value range of core degree gradually expands with time. Human settlements’ natural environment quality index rose slowly, especially in the middle reaches of the central Yunnan region.(2) There is a strong spatial correlation between the core degree of urban built-up area and the quality of human settlements natural environment, and the coupling degree is higher than 0.8 over the years.(3) The coupling coordination degree of the two shows core city>periphery city, southern city>northern city, central city>eastern and western city, showing the distribution pattern of ‘high in the middle, low around’; the overall coordination degree decreased slightly, and the high coordination range expanded significantly over time.(4) The differences in regional nature, resources and policies have affected the balance between urban development and ecological environment, making the basin cities mainly appear in five types of coupling and coordinated development. The research results provide a scientific basis for the rational development of urban built-up areas and the protection of the natural environment in the basin. The urban coreness index and the human settlements’ natural environment quality index model obtained to provide a reference for similar research.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[2] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[3] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[4] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[5] 郭强 叶许春 孟元可 樊龙凤. 基于IHA/RVA法的近年来鄱阳湖生态水位变异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 胡思 曾祎 王磊 贺新光. 长江流域极端降水的区域频率及时空特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 黄晓慧, 王礼力, 陆迁. 资本禀赋对农户水土保持技术价值认知的影响——以黄土高原区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 222 -230 .
[8] 郭贯成, 彭紫新, 周志伟. 工业企业类型对工业用地利用效率的影响研究——基于企业类型宏观视角的分类 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 241 -249 .
[9] 胡慧芝, 王建力, 王 勇, 龙晓泳. 1990~2015年长江流域县域粮食生产与粮食安全时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 359 -367 .
[10] 胡继亮, 熊自洁, 张悦, 高婷. 自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 483 -492 .