长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (01): 1-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201501001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

行政中心驻地对县域土地利用景观格局的影响研究

耿焕侠, 张小林, 李红波   

  1. (南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2015-01-20

INFLUENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER ON LANDSCAPE PATTERN OF LAND USE AT A COUNTY SCALE——A CASE STUDY OF FENGXIAN IN JIANGSU PROVINCE

GENG Huanxia, ZHANG Xiaolin, LI Hongbo   

  1. (School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Online:2015-01-20

摘要:

使用GIS(地理信息系统,Geographic Information System)的缓冲区法、空间叠置分析法以及景观格局分析法,分析不同等级的行政中心驻地对土地利用景观格局的影响。研究结果表明:(1)耕地是丰县的景观基质,聚落(城乡建设用地)景观是丰县主要的景观类型。与行政中心的距离越近,人为景观的面积比重就越高,大于各景观类型的现状比重,表现出较强烈的空间吸引特性;相反,自然景观所占比重远远低于现状比重,反映出较明显的空间排斥效应。(2)与镇政府的距离变大,土地利用景观的破碎程度、聚集程度、斑块形状的规则程度均先减弱后增强;与县政府驻地的距离变大,景观的破碎程度呈现“减弱-增强-稳定”模式,景观形状的复杂程度变大,聚集程度先减弱后稳定,景观的多样性与异质性受两等级行政中心驻地距离的影响程度均较小。(3)镇级、县级行政中心分别在1 500 m、3 000 m范围内对土地利用景观格局的影响程度大

Abstract:

Taking the landscape pattern in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province as the research subject, we applied buffer analysis and spatial overlay to investigate how the location of administrative center influences the landscape pattern with the support of ArcGIS 93 software and Fragstat 3. We selected seven landscape indices that can reflect landscape fragmentation, the regularity of landscape patch, the degree of aggregation and the diversity & heterogeneity of the landscape. The results show that: a) Cultivated land is the dominant land use type of the landscape and settlement landscape is one of the most important landscape patterns in Fengxian County. The degree of aggregation of cultivated lands and garden plots is higher than forest lands and the other agricultural lands. Natural reserved areas are minimally fragmented and suffered a mild influence from human activities. However, the degree of fragmentation is the highest for the other agricultural lands. The distance to the administrative center is near, the anthropogenic landscapes occupy a big proportion in the landscape area of the buffer zone, that is to say there is a characteristic of spatial attraction. However, the proportion of natural landscapes is lower, which is much smaller than the present proportion. In other words, there exists the effect of spatial repulsion. b) The distance to the town government expands, the degree of fragmentation, aggregation and the regularity of landscape patch tend to be strengthened in the first phase and then weakened. And the impact on landscape diversity and landscape heterogeneity can be so small if the distance to the town government is longer than 1 000 meters. With increasing distance to the county government, the degree of fragmentation presents a “weakenedenhancedstable” pattern. The degree of the complexity of the landscape shape increases gradually and accumulation degree decreases and then stable. Just like the changes in the landscape diversity and landscape heterogeneity which are affected by the distance to the town government, the two landscape indices can hardly change when the distance to the county government is more than 2 500 meters. The two different grinds of administrative center are of little influence on the diversity and the heterogeneity of the landscape. Overall, the distance to the county government would have more impact on the landscape pattern of land use than the distance to the town government. c) In a word, the two different levels of administrative center can affect the fragmentation degree, the shape character of patches, the aggregation level and the landscape diversity. The effective influence radius of the two different grinds of administrative center trend to be 1 500 meters and 3 000 meters after taking all the changes in the chosen landscape indexes into consideration

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李燕玲, 刘爱民. 长江流域冬季农业主要作物的耕地竞争机制及案例研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 146 .
[2] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[3] 简敏菲,弓晓峰,游 海,黄志中,朱 捷. 鄱阳湖水土环境及其水生维管束植物重金属污染[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 589 -593 .
[4] 王海英,宫渊波,陈林武. 不同植被恢复模式下土壤微生物及酶活性的比较——以嘉陵江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 201 -206 .
[5] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[6] 向云波,徐长乐,彭秀芬. 长江三角洲城市群循环经济发展水平的空间格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 661 .
[7] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[8] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[9] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[10] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .