长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (02): 208-218.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201602005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于面板数据的研发投入对区域经济增长影响分析

曹贤忠1, 曾刚1, 邹琳1, 刘刚1,2   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心/城市与区域科学学院, 上海 200062;
    2. 上海市农业科学院, 上海 201403
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-13 修回日期:2015-10-07 出版日期:2016-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘刚,E-mail:liugang@saas.sh.cn E-mail:liugang@saas.sh.cn
  • 作者简介:曹贤忠(1987~),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为区域创新网络与产业经济.E-mail:cao5956@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目"层级式产业集群内部技术权力突破与创新升级研究"(41371147);上海市科委软科学项目"基于长江经济带发展战略的长三角科技创新合作研究"(15692100700);华东师范大学2014博士生学术新人奖资助(XRZZ2014002)

IMPACT OF R&D INPUT ON REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH IN CASE OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC ZONE IN CHINA

CAO Xian-zhong1, ZENG Gang1, ZOU Lin1, LIU Gang1,2   

  1. 1. Center for Modern Chinese City Studies & School of City and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
    2. Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
  • Received:2015-05-13 Revised:2015-10-07 Online:2016-02-20
  • Supported by:
    The National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371147);The soft science research project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (15692100700);The Doctoral Young Scholar Funding of East China normal university (XRZZ2014002)

摘要: 利用长江经济带110个地市1990~2013年R&D投入与经济增长水平的相关面板数据,通过单位根检验、协整性检验和面板数据模型,对R&D经费投入和人员投入与区域经济增长的影响进行了分析。结果表明:①长江经济带各市的经济增长与R&D投入存在长期稳定的关系,R&D短期投入对区域经济增长的影响则存在着一定的滞后效应;②R&D人员投入产出弹性高于R&D经费投入,说明区域经济增长对R&D人员的依赖性更大;③R&D投入表现出东部地区高于中部地区,中部地区高于西部地区,但R&D投入对区域经济增长的影响则表现出中西部大于东部的现象,造成这一现象的原因在于所处发展阶段的不同和东中西区域经济特征不同。最后,从加大R&D经费投入强度、制定R&D投入中长期计划等方面提出了促进区域经济增长的建议。

关键词: 研发投入, 经济增长, 固定效应变系数模型, 长江经济带

Abstract: The Chinese government put forward the development strategy of the Yangtze River Economic Zone in September 2014. The proportion of GDP of the Yangtze River Economic Zone in China is 45.62%, and many scholars expected the proportion would up to 50% in 2020. The relationship between R&D input and economic growth has been the hot study in the economics, economic geography and so on, and research has found that R&D input was an important effect on regional economic growth and the impact of R&D input on economic growth was positive correlation, but some deficiencies were still existed. Based on the C-D model, we built the relationship model between R&D input and economic growth through the panel data of R&D input and economic growth of 110 cities during 1990-2013 in Yangtze River Economic Zone. With the help of Eviews7.2, we finessed the unit root test, co-integration test and built the panel data model, which can be used to analysis the impact of R&D input on regional economic growth. The results showed that: (1) The relationship between R&D input and regional economic growth was long-term and stable, and there was a certain hysteresis effect between R&D short-term input and regional economic growth, the elasticity of R&D input in the short-term was higher than the long-term.; (2) The relationship between R&D input and regional economic growth was positive correlation significantly, but the elasticity coefficient of R&D personnel input (the average of Yangtze River Economic Zone was 2.351) was higher than R&D expenditure input (the average of Yangtze river economic belt is 1.013), which showed that regional economic growth dependences much more on R&D personnel. In the other words, talent (person with ability) was more important than money to regional economic growth; (3) The spatial differences of R&D input in the Yangtze River Economic Zone was significant, and R&D input in the area of the lower of Yangtze River was the highest, but the impact of R&D input on regional economic growth in the area of the lower Yangtze River was the lowest. Why was the impact of R&D input on regional economic growth different among the regions? The growth of regions would result from the balance between their stocks of both local and global (i.e. non-local) network capital, but the R&D input of this article was local, and the regions in the area of the lower of Yangtze River were export-oriented economy, so the impact of R&D input on regional economic growth in the area of the lower of Yangtze River was less significant than the middle and the upper of Yangtze River. At last, in order to promote regional economic growth, this article put forward the proposal of increasing the intensity of R&D input, making the medium and long-term planning for R&D input, and improving the achievements conversion rate of scientific and technological. In the future, we can incorporate the network capital of innovation network of local and global into the regional economic growth model, which can help us to better research the relationship between regional economic growth and innovation.

Key words: R&D input, economic growth, fixed-effects variable-coefficient model, the Yangtze River Economic Zone

中图分类号: 

  • K902
[1] IBERT O. Towards a geography of knowledge creation:the ambivalences between ‘knowledge as an object’ and ‘knowing in practice’[J]. Regional Studies, 2007, 41(1):103-114.
[2] ZUCKER L G, DARBY M R, FURNER J, et al. Minerva unbound:knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(6):850-863.
[3] DE NORONHA VAZ T, NIJKAMP P. Knowledge and innovation:the strings between global and local dimensions of sustainable growth[J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2009, 21(4):441-455.
[4] ANTONELLI C, PATRUCCO P P, QUATRARO A. Productivity growth and pecuniary knowledge externalities:an empirical analysis of agglomeration economies in European regions[J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 87(1):23-50.
[5] ROMER P M. Economic growth[M]//HENDERSON D. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Indianapolis, IN:Liberty Fund, 2007.
[6] SOLOW R M. Technical change and the aggregate production function[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1957, 39(3):312-320.
[7] SWAN T W. Economic growth and capital accumulation[J]. Economic Record, 1956, 32(2):334-361.
[8] ANDERSSON M, KARLSSON C. Knowledge in regional economic growth-the role of knowledge accessibility[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2007, 14(2):129-149.
[9] ROMER P M. Endogenous technological change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(5):S71-S102.
[10] AGHION P, HOWITT P. Endogenous growth theory[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1998.
[11] HUGGINS R, THOMPSON P. A Network-based view of regional growth[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2014, 14(3):511-545.
[12] JONES C I. Growth:with or without scale effects?[J]. American Economic Review, 1998, 89(2):139-144.
[13] STERLACCHINI A. R&D, higher education and regional growth:uneven linkages among european regions[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(6/7):1096-1107.
[14] 姜怀宇, 李铁立. R&D投入的区位模式与区域经济发展[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(1):13-19.[JIANG H Y, LI T L. Locational patterns of investment on R&D and regional economic development[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2006, 26(1):13-19.]
[15] 张明喜. 我国高新区研发投入的经济贡献——基于面板数据的实证分析[J]. 产业经济研究, 2010(1):80-86.[ZHANG M X. Study on R&D input contributions in Chinese state level science and technology industrial parks——an empirical analysis based on panel data[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2010(1):80-86.]
[16] 党兴华, 张优智. R&D投入与经济增长的协整检验:基于1988-2009年的数据分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(专辑):776-782.[DANG X H, ZHANG Y Z. The analysis of cointegration relationship of R&D and economic growth based on the data between 1988 and 2009[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2011, 19(S):776-782.]
[17] 范柏乃, 段忠贤, 江蕾. 中国科技投入的经济发展效应区域差异分析[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(12):10-15.[FAN B N, DUAN Z X, JIANG L. Regional difference in influence of science & technology input on economic development:empirical research based on variable coefficient model[J]. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(12):10-15.]
[18] 谢兰云. 中国省域R&D投入对经济增长作用途径的空间计量分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(9):37-47.[XIE L Y. A spatial econometric analysis of impact of Chinese Provinces' R&D investment on economic growth[J]. China Soft Science, 2013(9):37-47.]
[19] 孙久文, 丁鸿君. 我国工业化阶段测度的区域特征实证分析——基于江苏、河南和新疆的比较研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2011(7):28-33, 40.[SUN J W, DING H J. The positive analysis on regional characters of the stage measure of industrialization in our country based on the research of the comparsion among Jiangsu, Henan and Xinjiang[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2011(7):28-33, 40.]
[20] 吕国庆, 曾刚, 郭金龙. 长三角装备制造业产学研创新网络体系的演化分析[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(9):1051-1059.[LV G Q, ZENG G, GUO J L. Innovation network system of industry-university-research institute of equipment manufacturing industry in the Changjiang River Delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(9):1051-1059.]
[21] HUGGINS R. Forms of network resource:knowledge access and the role of inter-firm networks[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12(3):335-352.
[22] HUGGINS R, JOHNSTON A. Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks:the influence of network resources, spatial proximity, and firm size[J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2010, 22(5):457-484.
[23] KRAMER J P, MARINELLI E, IAMMARINO S, et al. Intangible assets as drivers of innovation:empirical evidence on multinational enterprises in German and UK regional systems of innovation[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(9):447-458.
[24] KRAMER J P, DIEZ J R. Catching the local buzz by embedding? Empirical insights on the regional embeddedness of multinational enterprises in Germany and the UK[J]. Regional Studies, 2012, 46(10):1303-1317.
[1] 刘云强, 权 泉, 朱佳玲, 王 芳. 绿色技术创新、产业集聚与生态效率——以长江经济带城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2395-2406.
[2] 王丰龙, 曾刚, 叶琴, 陈弘挺. 基于创新合作联系的城市网络格局分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 797-805.
[3] 武晓静, 杜德斌, 肖刚, 管明明. 长江经济带城市创新能力差异的时空格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 490-499.
[4] 成定平, 淦苏美. 长江经济带高技术产业投入产出效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 325-332.
[5] 庄汝龙, 宓科娜, 陈阳, 赵彪. 长三角地区社会福利与经济增长耦合协调时空分异[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 171-179.
[6] 徐小任, 徐勇. 长江经济带后备适宜建设用地潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1789-1796.
[7] 李嬛, 宁越敏, 魏也华, 陈斐然. 长江经济带沿江城市群空间分布格局与联动机理研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1797-1806.
[8] 郭庆宾, 刘琪, 张冰倩. 环境规制是否抑制了国际R&D溢出效应——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1807-1814.
[9] 刘传江, 赵晓梦. 长江经济带全要素碳生产率的时空演化及提升潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1635-1644.
[10] 刘玮辰, 陆玉麒, 文玉钊. 长江经济带城市对外服务能力时空演变分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1475-1483.
[11] 傅钰, 钟业喜, 冯兴华. 长江经济带陆路交通可达性格局演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1484-1491.
[12] 任俊霖, 李浩, 伍新木, 李雪松. 基于主成分分析法的长江经济带省会城市水生态文明评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1537-1544.
[13] 宓泽锋, 曾刚, 尚勇敏, 陈弘挺, 朱菲菲, 陈斐然. 长江经济带市域生态文明建设现状及发展潜力初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1438-1447.
[14] 周琰, 张安录. 武汉城市圈城市用地扩张对经济增长贡献度的动态研究——“两型社会”试验区设置前后的比较[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1043-1051.
[15] 丁军, 黄茹, 吕拉昌. 基于专利授权数的长江经济带创新差异的多尺度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 868-876.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .