长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (4): 1005-1015.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202004021

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

江西省农业生产要素错配测度与影响因素的实证研究

吴伟伟1,包铠璇2*,张燕华1   

  1. (1.南昌大学经济管理学院,江西 南昌 330031; 2.南昌大学生命科学学院,江西 南昌 330031)
  • 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-06-12

Positive Research on the Misallocation of Agricultural Factorand Its Determinants in Jiangxi Province

WU Wei-wei1, BAO Kai-xuan2, ZHANG Yan-hua1   

  1. (1. School of Economics & Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; 2. School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-06-12

摘要: 摘要: 基于江西省2007~2016年地级市面板数据,借鉴经典要素错配模型,测度省内11个地级市农业生产要素错配,实证检验相关因素对要素错配的影响。结果表明:3类农业生产要素错配中,总体要素错配最大,其次是资本错配,劳动力错配最小。从空间分布来看,各地市要素错配存在较大差异,劳动力错配离散程度先减后增,资本错配和总体要素错配离散程度降低。时间上来看,各地市3类错配均经历了先增后减的变化过程,要素错配有所改善,部分地市在测度期内要素错配波动较大。影响因素的实证分析结果显示:支农财政、工业化水平、农业劳动力占比、人均化肥投入有利于降低农业生产要素错配,而人均耕地规模正向影响了要素错配,农业生产的规模效应未充分发挥。为提高农业生产要素的配置效率,应着重改善资本错配,继续完善支农财政金融政策,提高其与区域资源禀赋的耦合度,鼓励生产要素回流到农业部门,优化要素投入配比,充分发挥农业规模经营的优势,促进农业科技进步和技术创新。

Abstract: Abstract:Based on panel data of 11 cities in Jiangxi Province from 2007 to 2016 and the classic misallocation model of productive factors, this paper calculates the misallocation of agricultural factors, and analyzes the factors that influence misallocation of agricultural factors in those cities. The research result shows the overall factor misallocation is the most serious and the misallocation of capital ranks second. The misallocation of labor is the least serious. From regional distribution perspective, the difference of misallocation of agricultural factors is obvious among cities. The dispersion of misallocation of labor increases after decreasing while the dispersion of misallocation of capital and total factor decreases over time. From time perspective, three kinds of misallocation experience the process of increasing first and then decreasing. Misallocation of agricultural factors in a few cities in Jiangxi Province fluctuates greatly during the measurement period. The result of empirical research shows that the financial support, industrialization level, agricultural labor ratio and fertilizer input per capita contribute to reduce the misallocation of agricultural factors while the cultivated area per capita promotes the misallocation. Hence, the scale effect of agricultural production is not fully reflected. To increase the allocation efficiency of agricultural production factor, it is necessary to emphasize on reducing misallocation of capital and improve financial system of supporting agriculture aiming to enhance the coordination between policy and agricultural endowment. Also it is necessary to encourage productive factor to return to agricultural sector, optimize the input ratio of productive factor, sufficiently take the advantage of scale management and promote technical advance and innovation of agriculture.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杜晓芹, 王 芳, 赵卉卉, 王 远, 朱晓东. 基于CVM的武进港水环境综合整治工程环境价值支付/受偿意愿评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(04): 449 .
[2] 尹炜, 朱惇, 雷俊山, 贾海燕, 曾祉祥. 丹江口水库典型消落区不同土地利用类型土壤养分分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1185 -1191 .
[3] 于忠华, 李文青, 刘海滨, 秦海旭. 快速发展地区经济增长与资源环境协调性分析——以南京为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1698 -1704 .
[4] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[5] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[6] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[7] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[8] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[9] 李雪松, 龙湘雪, 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 505 -516 .
[10] 范辉. 基于推拉理论的“农二代”耕作意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .