长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (11): 1645-1653.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj2016011002
钟业喜, 傅钰, 冯兴华
ZHONG Ye-xi, FU Yu, FENG Xing-hua
摘要: 为探究铁路网络时空压缩效应对城市可达性的影响,基于2009年和2014年铁路列车时刻表数据,结合传统数理统计方法及空间分析方法,对中国地级以上城市可达性及其格局演变进行深入分析。结果表明:(1)铁路客运的数量和类型上均有较大变化,特别是始发列车及动车组的大幅增加及高铁的开通运行,中国城市可达性得到一定程度提升,但城市可达性改善地域差异性显著。(2)北上广三大核心城市在城市可达性等级体系中第一层级地位稳固,交通区位条件的差异使得城市可达性等级体系产生一定变化。(3)中国城市可达性绝对及相对差距均呈现出不断扩大趋势,列车停靠数量的极化效应显著、新增加的高速客运更多地向高等级中心城市集聚,铁路基础设施的建设正在重塑中国生产力格局。(4)从城市功能属性及规模属性视角,以始发列车和停靠列车中位数为临界值,将中国城市划分为高规模高功能、高规模低功能、低规模高功能、低规模低功能等4种类型,并依次分析城市分布特征及成因,为铁路客运的合理配置及交通网络优化布局提供参考。
中图分类号:
[1] MAĆKIEWICZ A, RATAJCZAK W. Towards a new definition of topological accessibility[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 1996, 30(1):47-79. [2] HANSEN W G. How accessibility shapes land use[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959, 25(2):73-76. [3] PIRIE G H. Measuring accessibility:a review and proposal[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1979, 11(3):299-312. [4] INGRAM D R. The concept of accessibility:a search for an operational form[J]. Regional Studies, 1971, 5(2):101-107. [5] ALLEN W B, LIU D, SINGER S. Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 1993, 27(6):439-449. [6] WACHS M, KUMAGAI T G. Physical accessibility as a social indicator[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1973, 7(5):437-456. [7] BLACK J, CONROY M. Accessibility measures and the social evaluation of urban structure[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1977, 9(9):1013-1031. [8] SHEN Q. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 1998, 25(3):345-365. [9] MORAN P A P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena[J]. Biometrika, 1950, 37(1/2):17-23. [10] GUTIERREZ J, GONZÁLEZ R, GÓMEZ G. The European high-speed train network:predicted effects on accessibility patterns[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(4):227-238. [11] SASAKI K, OHASHI T, ANDO A. High-speed rail transit impact on regional system:does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion?[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, 31(1):77-98. [12] SALAS-OLMEDO M H, GARCÍA P, GUTIÉRREZ J. Accessibility and transport infrastructure improvement assessment:the role of borders and multilateral resistance[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015, 82(9):110-129. [13] OLSSON J. Improved road accessibility and indirect development effects:evidence from rural Philippines[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17(6):476-483. [14] KANUGANTI S, SARKAR A K, SINGH A P, et al. Quantification of accessibility to health facilities in rural areas[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2015, 3(3):311-320. [15] LA ROSA D. Accessibility to greenspaces:GIS based indicators forsustainable planning in a dense urban context[J]. Ecological Indicators,2014, 42:122-134. [16] 蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(10):1287-1298.[JIANG H B, XUE S J, QI Y. The influence of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railways on land accessibility of regional center cities[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(10):1287-1298.] [17] 孟德友, 陆玉麒. 高速铁路对河南沿线城市可达性及经济联系的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(5):537-543.[MENG D Y, LU Y Q. Impact of high-speed railway on accessibility and economic linkage of cities along the railway in Henan Province, China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(5):537-543.] [18] 杨金华. 高速铁路对湖南城市群可达性的影响[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(2):108-112.[YANG J H. Study on the regional accessibility of urban agglomeration in Hunan Province under the impact of high-speed railway[J]. Human Geography, 2014, 29(2):108-112.] [19] 赵丹, 张京祥. 高速铁路影响下的长三角城市群可达性空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(4):391-398.[ZHAO D, ZHANG J X. Research into spatial pattern changes of Yangtze River Delta's accessibility under the impact of high-speed railway[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(4):391-398.] [20] 陈琳, 钟业喜, 文玉钊. 高铁时代赣南原中央苏区空间结构研究[J]. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(3):324-330.[CHEN L, ZHONG Y X, WEN Y Z. Spatial structure of the central soviet area in southern Jiangxi in high-speed railway era[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Science), 2013, 37(3):324-330.] [21] 钟业喜, 陆玉麒. 基于空间联系的城市腹地范围划分——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(5):536-543.[ZHONG Y X, LU Y Q. Measuring method of urban hinterland based on spatial linkage:a case of Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(5):536-543.] [22] 国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2014.[NBS, The City Social and Economic Investigation Department. China city statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2014.] [23] 赵建新. 论区域经济差距的衡量指标与测度方法[J]. 经济地理, 1998, 18(3):20-24, 29.[ZHAO J X. Seberal thoughts on China's urban redevelopment[J]. Economic Geography, 1998, 18(3):20-24, 29.] [24] 高春花. 城市区域正义与城市群协同发展——以当代西方城市理论为视角[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 49(4):36-40.[GAO C H. Urban regional justice and the coordinated development of urban agglomeration-From the perspective of contemporary western city theory[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Social Sciences), 2016, 49(4):36-40.] |
[1] | 王宇环, 靳 诚, 安鸿波, 刘 月. 基于低碳出行方式的南京市本地居民景点可达性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2443-2452. |
[2] | 阎福礼, 邹艺昭, 王世新, 周艺, 朱金峰. 中国不同交通模式的可达性空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 806-815. |
[3] | 傅钰, 钟业喜, 冯兴华. 长江经济带陆路交通可达性格局演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1484-1491. |
[4] | 马勇, 童昀. 水利旅游资源空间结构特征及自驾车可达性研究——以长江中游城市群国家水利风景区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1167-1175. |
[5] | 杨丽婷, 刘大均, 赵越, 胡静, 张祥. 长江中游城市群森林公园空间分布格局及可达性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1228-1237. |
[6] | 冯兴华, 钟业喜, 李建新, 黄洁. 长江中游城市群县域城镇化水平空间格局演变及驱动因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 899-908. |
[7] | 吴 威,曹有挥,曹卫东,徐 建,王 玥,. 区域高速公路网络构建对可达性空间格局的影响——以安徽沿江地区为实证 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 726-726. |
|