长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (11): 1645-1653.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj2016011002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于铁路客运的中国城市可达性及类型研究

钟业喜, 傅钰, 冯兴华   

  1. 江西师范大学江西经济发展研究院/区域发展与规划研究中心, 江西 南昌 330022
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-25 修回日期:2016-05-06 出版日期:2016-11-20
  • 作者简介:钟业喜(1973~),男,教授,博士,研究方向为经济地理与空间规划.E-mail:zhongyexi@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41561025,41161021)

THE ACCESSIBILITY PATTERNS AND CITY TYPES BASED ON PASSENGER RAIL TRANSPORT IN CHINA

ZHONG Ye-xi, FU Yu, FENG Xing-hua   

  1. Jiangxi Institute of Economic Development, Research Center for Regional Development & Planning, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
  • Received:2016-02-25 Revised:2016-05-06 Online:2016-11-20
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science foundation of China(41561025,41161021)

摘要: 为探究铁路网络时空压缩效应对城市可达性的影响,基于2009年和2014年铁路列车时刻表数据,结合传统数理统计方法及空间分析方法,对中国地级以上城市可达性及其格局演变进行深入分析。结果表明:(1)铁路客运的数量和类型上均有较大变化,特别是始发列车及动车组的大幅增加及高铁的开通运行,中国城市可达性得到一定程度提升,但城市可达性改善地域差异性显著。(2)北上广三大核心城市在城市可达性等级体系中第一层级地位稳固,交通区位条件的差异使得城市可达性等级体系产生一定变化。(3)中国城市可达性绝对及相对差距均呈现出不断扩大趋势,列车停靠数量的极化效应显著、新增加的高速客运更多地向高等级中心城市集聚,铁路基础设施的建设正在重塑中国生产力格局。(4)从城市功能属性及规模属性视角,以始发列车和停靠列车中位数为临界值,将中国城市划分为高规模高功能、高规模低功能、低规模高功能、低规模低功能等4种类型,并依次分析城市分布特征及成因,为铁路客运的合理配置及交通网络优化布局提供参考。

关键词: 铁路客运, 可达性, 城市类型, 中国城市

Abstract: With the development of China's railway network, the level of urban accessibility received a significant boost and the compression effect of regional time-space became further highlight.The study based on the data of the railway train schedules in 2009 and 2014, prefecture-level cities in China as the study object, combined with the traditional method of mathematical statistics and spatial analysis method, analysis the accessibility of prefecture-level cities and its types in China. Results show that:(1) The number and type of passenger rail transport have great changes, especially originating trains and bullet train have a greatly increased and the opening of the high-speed operation due to the accessibility of cities improved to a certain extent, but the city accessibility to improve regional difference significantly. (2) three core cities(Beijing、Shanghai and Guangzhou) in urban accessibility rating system established the first level, the traffic condition of differences caused the city accessibility rating system change. (3) The absolute and relative gap between Chinese urban accessibility are showing a growing trend, the number of train had a significantly effect of polarization and the new increase of the passenger and more on high-grade center city agglomeration, the construction of the railway infrastructure is reshaping China productivity pattern. (4) From the perspective of urban function and size attribute to dock originating trains and train the median as the critical value, the Chinese city is divided into four types including high scale and high function, high scale but low function, low scale but high function, low scale and low function. Analysis the distribution characteristics and the reason of city. The improvement of the railway traffic network is becoming more and more important, this study provides significance guiding for reasonable allocation of railway passenger transportation and layout of transportation network based on the railway passenger transport between urban traffic accessibility and spatial pattern of evolution.

Key words: passenger rail transport, accessibility, city type, Chinese city

中图分类号: 

  • F532
[1] MAĆKIEWICZ A, RATAJCZAK W. Towards a new definition of topological accessibility[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 1996, 30(1):47-79.
[2] HANSEN W G. How accessibility shapes land use[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959, 25(2):73-76.
[3] PIRIE G H. Measuring accessibility:a review and proposal[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1979, 11(3):299-312.
[4] INGRAM D R. The concept of accessibility:a search for an operational form[J]. Regional Studies, 1971, 5(2):101-107.
[5] ALLEN W B, LIU D, SINGER S. Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 1993, 27(6):439-449.
[6] WACHS M, KUMAGAI T G. Physical accessibility as a social indicator[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1973, 7(5):437-456.
[7] BLACK J, CONROY M. Accessibility measures and the social evaluation of urban structure[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1977, 9(9):1013-1031.
[8] SHEN Q. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 1998, 25(3):345-365.
[9] MORAN P A P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena[J]. Biometrika, 1950, 37(1/2):17-23.
[10] GUTIERREZ J, GONZÁLEZ R, GÓMEZ G. The European high-speed train network:predicted effects on accessibility patterns[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996, 4(4):227-238.
[11] SASAKI K, OHASHI T, ANDO A. High-speed rail transit impact on regional system:does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion?[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, 31(1):77-98.
[12] SALAS-OLMEDO M H, GARCÍA P, GUTIÉRREZ J. Accessibility and transport infrastructure improvement assessment:the role of borders and multilateral resistance[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015, 82(9):110-129.
[13] OLSSON J. Improved road accessibility and indirect development effects:evidence from rural Philippines[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17(6):476-483.
[14] KANUGANTI S, SARKAR A K, SINGH A P, et al. Quantification of accessibility to health facilities in rural areas[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2015, 3(3):311-320.
[15] LA ROSA D. Accessibility to greenspaces:GIS based indicators forsustainable planning in a dense urban context[J]. Ecological Indicators,2014, 42:122-134.
[16] 蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(10):1287-1298.[JIANG H B, XUE S J, QI Y. The influence of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railways on land accessibility of regional center cities[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(10):1287-1298.]
[17] 孟德友, 陆玉麒. 高速铁路对河南沿线城市可达性及经济联系的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(5):537-543.[MENG D Y, LU Y Q. Impact of high-speed railway on accessibility and economic linkage of cities along the railway in Henan Province, China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(5):537-543.]
[18] 杨金华. 高速铁路对湖南城市群可达性的影响[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(2):108-112.[YANG J H. Study on the regional accessibility of urban agglomeration in Hunan Province under the impact of high-speed railway[J]. Human Geography, 2014, 29(2):108-112.]
[19] 赵丹, 张京祥. 高速铁路影响下的长三角城市群可达性空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(4):391-398.[ZHAO D, ZHANG J X. Research into spatial pattern changes of Yangtze River Delta's accessibility under the impact of high-speed railway[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(4):391-398.]
[20] 陈琳, 钟业喜, 文玉钊. 高铁时代赣南原中央苏区空间结构研究[J]. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(3):324-330.[CHEN L, ZHONG Y X, WEN Y Z. Spatial structure of the central soviet area in southern Jiangxi in high-speed railway era[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Science), 2013, 37(3):324-330.]
[21] 钟业喜, 陆玉麒. 基于空间联系的城市腹地范围划分——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(5):536-543.[ZHONG Y X, LU Y Q. Measuring method of urban hinterland based on spatial linkage:a case of Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(5):536-543.]
[22] 国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2014.[NBS, The City Social and Economic Investigation Department. China city statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2014.]
[23] 赵建新. 论区域经济差距的衡量指标与测度方法[J]. 经济地理, 1998, 18(3):20-24, 29.[ZHAO J X. Seberal thoughts on China's urban redevelopment[J]. Economic Geography, 1998, 18(3):20-24, 29.]
[24] 高春花. 城市区域正义与城市群协同发展——以当代西方城市理论为视角[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 49(4):36-40.[GAO C H. Urban regional justice and the coordinated development of urban agglomeration-From the perspective of contemporary western city theory[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Social Sciences), 2016, 49(4):36-40.]
[1] 王宇环, 靳 诚, 安鸿波, 刘 月. 基于低碳出行方式的南京市本地居民景点可达性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2443-2452.
[2] 阎福礼, 邹艺昭, 王世新, 周艺, 朱金峰. 中国不同交通模式的可达性空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 806-815.
[3] 傅钰, 钟业喜, 冯兴华. 长江经济带陆路交通可达性格局演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1484-1491.
[4] 马勇, 童昀. 水利旅游资源空间结构特征及自驾车可达性研究——以长江中游城市群国家水利风景区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1167-1175.
[5] 杨丽婷, 刘大均, 赵越, 胡静, 张祥. 长江中游城市群森林公园空间分布格局及可达性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1228-1237.
[6] 冯兴华, 钟业喜, 李建新, 黄洁. 长江中游城市群县域城镇化水平空间格局演变及驱动因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 899-908.
[7] 吴 威,曹有挥,曹卫东,徐 建,王 玥,. 区域高速公路网络构建对可达性空间格局的影响——以安徽沿江地区为实证 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 726-726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[3] 程 江,何 青,王元叶,刘 红,夏小明. 长江河口细颗粒泥沙絮凝体粒径的谱分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 460 -464 .
[4] 彭 建,景 娟,吴健生,蒋依依,张 源. 乡村产业结构评价——以云南省永胜县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 413 .
[5] 蔡述明. 研究长江中游地区水资源开发利用的新成果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 100 .
[6] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[7] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[8] 段学花 王兆印 余国安. 以底栖动物为指示物种对长江流域水生态进行评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 241 -247 .
[9] 王宏巍. 俄罗斯土壤污染防治立法研究及其对构建我国《土壤污染防治法》的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 326 .
[10] 刘蓓蓓, 李凤英, 俞钦钦, 于洋, 毕军. 长江三角洲城市间环境公平性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1093 .