长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (03): 387-394.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201603004
张明辉, 蔡银莺, 朱兰兰
ZHANG Ming-hui, CAI Yin-ying, ZHU Lan-lan
摘要: 在大力推进农业现代化的背景下,探讨农地流转对农户家庭经济效应的影响,为农户权益保障提供参考。采用二值选择Bivariate Probit模型分析农户参与农地流转行为的影响因素,并根据农户家庭经济收支状况,利用Match模型评估农地流转行为给农户家庭带来的经济效应。研究结果表明:(1)农户家庭劳动力比重、受教育程度、人均耕地、农田生态环境等资源禀赋是影响农地流转的关键因素;(2)地区经济发展水平与农地规模经营相辅相成、互相促进,能够有力推动农业现代化建设;(3)农地转入或转出对农户家庭经济效益并未产生决定性影响,农户根据家庭实际选择恰当的农地流转方式才能有效提升家庭经济福利水平。建议着力完善农地流转市场机制和农村社会保障制度,借助市场力量实现土地经营权有序流转,切实尊重农户意愿及保障农户权益。
中图分类号:
[1] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 1997 Census of agriculture:Agricultural economics and land ownership survey (1999)[R]. AC97-SP-4, Special Studies, Part IV. 2001. [2] CIAIAN P, KANCS D, SWINNEN J, et al. Key Issues and developments in farmland rental markets in EU member states and candidate countries[R]. 245123-FP7-KBBE-2009-3, General Information, 2012. [3] KUNIMITSU Y. Have the agricultural public investments improved rice productivity through farmland usage reallocation?:An empirical study on Japanese paddy-field rental transactions[C]//2004 Annual Meeting. Tulsa, Oklahoma:Southern Agricultural Economics Association, 2004. [4] Do Q T, Iyer L. Land titling and rural transition in Vietnam[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2008, 56(3):531-579. [5] 安珊. 我国农村土地流转市场化问题研究[D]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学硕士学位论文, 2014.[AN S. Study on the process of rural land transference market in China[D]. Beijing:Master Dissertation of Capital University of Economics and Business, 2014.] [6] 人民网(People.cn). 关注一号文件:亿万农民进城广袤田野谁来耕耘[EB/OL]. (2014-01-21)[2015-07-04] http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2014/0121/c70731-24177128.html. [7] 钟晓兰, 李江涛, 冯艳芬, 等. 农户认知视角下广东省农村土地流转意愿与流转行为研究[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(10):2082-2093.[ZHONG X L, LI J T, FENG Y F, et al. Farmland transfer willingness and behavior in the perspective of farm household cognition in Guangdong Province[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(10):2082-2093.] [8] 吕世辰, 李华. 准市民参与耕地流转的现状及影响因素——基于中部地区省内流动的准市民群体的考察[J]. 中国农村经济, 2011(4):57-64.[LU S C, LI H. The status and Influence factors of Quasi-Citizens to participate cultivated land transference:Based on the study of the floating Quasi-Citizens in central region of the province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2011(4):57-64.] [9] 张四梅. 人口结构变动视角下的我国农村土地流转[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(8):131-136.[ZHANG S M. Rural land transfer in China from the perspective of population structure change[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(8):131-136.] [10] 易小燕, 肖碧林. 典型地区农民耕地流转基本特征及影响因素分析——基于浙江、河北两省356户农户的经验数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(1):158-165.[YI X Y, XIAO B L. Empirical data of 356 farmers in Zhejiang and Hebei Provinces:features and factors of farmland transfer in typical areas[J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(1):158-165.] [11] 徐美银. 发达地区农民土地转出意愿影响因素分析——基于浙江省426份调研问卷的实证[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 14(6):97-105.[XU M Y. An empirical study on the farmers wishes about transfer of rural land in developed areas[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 14(6):97-105.] [12] 高珊, 黄贤金. 农村市场化对农户耕地流转的影响——以沪苏皖农户调查为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(7):816-820.[GAO S, HUANG X J. Influence of rural marketization on farmers' cultivated land transfer:an empirical study based on Shanghai City, Jiangsu and Anhui Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(7):816-820.] [13] 王志章, 刘天元, 贾煜, 等. 农业现代化进程中农户对土地流转意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(19):203-207.[WANG Z Z, LIU T Y, JIA Y, et al. Impact factors on willingness of farmer' land circulation of the agricultural modernization process[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 41(19):203-207.] [14] 于传岗. 政府主导型农地流转模式特征与演化趋势[J]. 商业研究, 2012(12):186-192.[YU C G. Characteristics and evolution trend of rural land transfer mode dominanted by government[J]. Commercial Research, 2012(12):186-192.] [15] 胡初枝, 黄贤金, 张力军. 农户农地流转的福利经济效果分析——基于农户调查的分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2008(1):184-186. [16] 林乐芬, 金媛. 农地流转方式福利效应研究——基于农地流转供求方的理性选择[J]. 南京社会科学, 2012(9):74-79.[LIN L F, JIN Y. The research of rural land transaction welfare effect:based on the supply-demand choice[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2012(9):74-79.] [17] 游和远, 吴次芳, 鲍海君. 农地流转、非农就业与农地转出户福利——来自黔浙鲁农户的证据[J]. 农业经济问题, 2013(3):16-25.[YOU H Y, WU C F, BAO H J. Farmland circulation, off-farm employment and peasant households' welfare who rent out farmland:an empirical study of peasant households in Guizhou, Zhejiang and Shandong[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2013(3):16-25.] [18] 杨佳. 湖北省农村土地承包经营权流转市场研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学博士学位论文, 2009.[YANG J. Study on transference market of rural land contractual management right in Hubei Province[D]. Wuhan:Doctor Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009.] [19] 张佰林, 杨庆媛, 苏康传, 等. 基于生计视角的异质性农户转户退耕决策研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(2):170-180.[ZHANG B L, YANG Q Y, SU K C, et al. Heterogeneous households' decision on household registration transfer and farmland relinquishment:From livelihood perspective[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(3):170-180.] [20] 宋辉, 钟涨宝. 基于农户行为的农地流转实证研究——以湖北省襄阳市312户农户为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(5):943-949.[SONG H, ZHONG Z B. An empirical study of farmland circulation based on household surveys[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(5):943-949.] [21] 陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2010. [22] 郎海如. 基于Bivariate Probit模型的土地流转影响因素分析——以江西省为例[J]. 江西农业学报, 2014, 26(6):92-96, 101.[LANG H R. Analysis of factors affecting land transfer based on Bivariate Probit model:an example from Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2014, 26(6):92-96, 101.] [23] 徐唐奇, 李雪, 张安录. 农地城市流转中农民集体福利均衡分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(5):50-55.[XU T Q, LI X, ZHANG A L. Study on farmer collectivity's welfare equilibrium in rural-urban land conversion[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(5):50-55.] [24] 李庆海, 李锐, 王兆华. 农户土地租赁行为及其福利效果[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(1):269-288.[LI Q H, LI R, WANG Z H. The land rental market and its welfare effects[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2012, 11(1):269-288.] |
[1] | 纪红蕾, 蔡银莺. 生计资本异质对农户农地流转行为的影响——以武汉城市郊区的516户农民为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 220-226. |
[2] | 李传武, 梁双波, 车前进. 主体功能区视角下芜湖市乡村聚落空间分类与重构[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1736-1743. |
[3] | 刘咏梅, 李 谦, 符海月| 江 南. 3S技术在衔接主体功能区规划与土地利用管理中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1003-. |
|