长三角地区社会福利与经济增长耦合协调时空分异

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201702002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 社会福利与经济增长的耦合协调是城市可持续发展的核心问题之一。以长三角41地市为研究单元，运用熵值法测度社会福利与经济增长指数，进一步借助耦合协调评价模型计算协调度、发展度以及耦合度，并据此进行耦合协调类型划分及其空间关联特征分析。结果表明：①长三角41地市社会福利与经济增长整体趋势波动上升，但近年来受经济下行影响，社会福利随经济增长出现缓慢下降趋势。②社会福利与经济增长指数空间吻合度较高且格局相对稳定。相比社会福利，经济增长首位特征明显，市际差异相对突出。③耦合度具有明显空间分异规律，初步形成“合宁沪杭甬”Z字型耦合协调发展轴带。④安徽省多数地市属于社会福利与经济增长失调衰退类型，亟需平衡二者关系，寻求优化路径，推动社会福利与经济增长向更高层次耦合协调发展类型演进。

关键词: 社会福利, 经济增长, 耦合协调, 长三角

Abstract: Coupling and coordination of social welfare and economic growth is one of the core issues of sustainable development. Using 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta and applying entropy method and evaluation model, we calculated social welfare and economic growth index, and calculated coordination, development and coupling degree for classification types and spatial characteristics studies. The results showed that:1) Social welfare and economic growth fluctuation showed an upward trend. Due to the economic downturn in recent years, social welfare has been declining slowly with the growth of economy. 2) Social welfare and economic growth index have high spatial consistency and relatively stable pattern. Compared to social welfare, the first primate feature of economic growth is obvious, and the inter-city difference is relatively prominent. 3) Coupling degree has obvious spatial differentiation rule, and initially formed the Z-type coupling and coordination development axis of Hefei-Nanjing-Shanghai-Hangzhou-Ningbo. 4) Most cities in Anhui Province belonged to the type of imbalance declining of social welfare and economic growth. Therefore, we suggest that it is time to balance the relationship, to seek optimizing path to promote social welfare and economic growth toward a higher level.

Key words: social welfare, economic growth, coupling and coordination, Yangtze River Delta

中图分类号:

F207

庄汝龙, 宓科娜, 陈阳, 赵彪. 长三角地区社会福利与经济增长耦合协调时空分异[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 171-179.

ZHUANG Ru-long, MI Ke-na, CHEN Yang, ZHAO Biao. TEMPO-SPATIAL DIFFERENCE OF COUPLING AND COORDINATION OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(02): 171-179.

参考文献

[1] 杨爱婷, 宋德勇. 中国社会福利水平的测度及对低福利增长的分析——基于功能与能力的视角[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29(11):3-17, 148.[YANG A T, SONG D Y. The measurement of Chinese social welfare and the analysis of low-welfare growth[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2012, 29(11):3-17, 148.]
[2] 逯进, 陈阳, 郭志仪. 社会福利、经济增长与区域发展差异——基于中国省域数据的耦合实证分析[J]. 中国人口科学, 2012(3):31-43.[LU J, CHEN Y, GUO Z Y. Social welfare, economic growth, and regional development difference:a coupling analysis based on Chinese provincial data[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2012(3):31-43.]
[3] 张盈华, 杜跃平. 社会保障与经济增长的最新研究综述[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 19(2):1-10.[ZHANG Y H, DU Y P. The newest studies on social security and economic growth[J]. Journal of Xidian University (Social Science Edition), 2009, 19(2):1-10.]
[4] 丁少群, 许志涛. 社会保障水平、收入分配与经济增长的互动关系研究——基于VAR模型的实证分析[J]. 中国经济问题, 2013(6):3-12.[DING S Q, XU Z T. A study on the interactive relationship of social security, income distribution and economic growth——an empirical analysis based on VAR model[J]. Economic Issues in China, 2013(6):3-12.]
[5] 钞小静, 沈坤荣. 城乡收入差距、劳动力质量与中国经济增长[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(6):30-43.[CHAO X J, SHEN K R. Urban-rural income disparity, labor quality and economic growth in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, 49(6):30-43.]
[6] 于忠华, 李文青, 刘海滨, 等. 快速发展地区经济增长与资源环境协调性分析——以南京为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10):1698-1704.[YU Z H, LI W Q, LIU H B, et al. Analysis on coordination between economic growth and resource and envionment in rapidly developing regions——a case study for Nanjing city[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(10):1698-1704.]
[7] 肖强, 胡聃, 肖洋, 等. 基于协整理论的经济增长与生态环境变化关系分析——以重庆市渝东南地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(11):3577-3585.[XIAO Q, HU D, XIAO Y, et al. Co-integration theory-based analysis on relationships between economic growth and eco-environmental changes:taking the southeast district in Chongqing city as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(11):3577-3585.]
[8] 张燕, 张洪, 彭补拙. 土地资源、环境与经济发展的协调性评价——以通州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4):529-534.[ZHANG Y, ZHANG H, PENG B Z. Evaluating coordination among land use, natural environment and economic development——a case of Tongzhou town[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2008, 17(4):529-534.]
[9] 王春元. 我国政府财政支出结构与经济增长关系实证分析[J]. 财经研究, 2009, 35(6):120-130.[WANG C Y. An empirical analysis of the relationship between fiscal expenditure structure and economic growth in China[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2009, 35(6):120-130.]
[10] 胡鞍钢, 刘生龙, 马振国. 人口老龄化、人口增长与经济增长——来自中国省际面板数据的实证证据[J]. 人口研究, 2012, 36(3):14-26.[HU A G, LIU S L, MA Z G. Population aging, population growth and economic growth:evidence from China's provincial panel data[J]. Population Research, 2012, 36(3):14-26.]
[11] 刘穷志, 何奇. 人口老龄化、经济增长与财政政策[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 12(1):119-134.[LIU Q Z, HE Q. Aging, economic growth, and fiscal policy[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2012, 12(1):119-134.]
[12] 刘军强, 熊谋林, 苏阳. 经济增长时期的国民幸福感——基于CGSS数据的追踪研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(12):82-102.[LIU J Q, XIONG M L, SU Y. National sense of happiness in the economic growth period:a study based on CGSS data[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2012(12):82-102.]
[13] BAMBRA C. Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism:regime theory and public health research[J]. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2007, 61(12):1098-1102.
[14] HAMILTON K, DIXON J A. Measuring the wealth of nations[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2003, 86(1/2):75-89.
[15] FUCHS C. Structuration theory and self-organization[J]. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2003, 16(2):133-167.
[16] KIM M. Social welfare system[M]//SHIN D C, RUTKOWSKI C P, PARK C M. The Quality of Life in Korea:Social Indicators Research Series. Netherlands:Springer, 2003:265-289.
[17] KOHRI K. An assessment of the social welfare system in the United Kingdom[J]. Hinyokika Kiyo, 1987, 33(10):1556-1559.
[18] ESPINA P Z, ARECHAVALA N S. An assessment of social welfare in Spain:territorial analysis using a synthetic welfare indicator[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2013, 111(1):1-23.
[19] 孙爱军, 吴钧, 刘国光, 等. 交通与城市化的耦合度分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 城市交通, 2007, 5(2):42-46.[SUN A J, WU J, LIU G G, et al. The study of coupling degree between traffic and urbanization:a case study of Jiangsu province[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2007, 5(2):42-46.]
[20] 陈晓红, 万鲁河. 城市化与生态环境耦合的脆弱性与协调性作用机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12):1450-1457.[CHEN X H, WAN L H. The interactive mechanisms for the coordination and vulnerability between regional urban and eco-environment[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(12):1450-1457.]
[21] 刘耀彬, 李仁东, 宋学锋. 中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1):105-112.[LIU Y B, LI R D, SONG X F. Analysis of coupling degrees of urbanization and ecological environment in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(1):105-112.]
[22] 马耀峰, 刘军胜. 基于供需视角的国内外旅游耦合研究审视[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(6):76-84.[MA Y F, LIU J S. Review of domestic and international tourism coupling based on the supply and demand perspective[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 42(6):76-84.]
[23] 贾智莲, 卢洪友. 财政分权与教育及民生类公共品供给的有效性——基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2010, 27(6):139-150.[JIA Z L, LU H Y. Fiscal decentralization and effective supply of education and public goods of the people's livelihood[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2010, 27(6):139-150.]
[24] 刘定惠, 杨永春. 区域经济-旅游-生态环境耦合协调度研究——以安徽省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(7):892-896.[LIU D H, YANG Y C. Coupling coordinative degree of regional economy-tourism-ecological environment——a case study of Anhui province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(7):892-896.]

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed