创新价值链视角下企业创新效率差异及影响因素分析——基于江苏省国家高新区企业的验证

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102002

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (2): 269-279.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102002

创新价值链视角下企业创新效率差异及影响因素分析——基于江苏省国家高新区企业的验证

储姗姗¹，汪涛^1,2* ，夏四友 ^3，4，杨雪梅¹，陈静¹

(1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院，江苏南京 210023；2. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心，江苏南京 210023；3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室，北京 100101;4.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院，北京 100049)

出版日期:2021-02-20 发布日期:2021-03-18

Differences and Influencing Factors of Enterprise Innovation Efficiency Based on Innovation Value Chain:A Case Study on Enterprises of National High-tech Zones in Jiangsu Province

CHU Shan-shan¹, WANG Tao^1,2, XIA Si-you ^3,4, YANG Xue-mei ¹, CHEN Jing¹

(1. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China ; 2. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China;3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;4. College of Resources and Environment, CAS, Beijing 100049, China)

Online:2021-02-20 Published:2021-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国经济新常态背景下，高新区企业创新增效提质是增强高新区创新能力的内生动力。从创新价值链视角出发，将企业创新过程分为技术开发阶段和经济转化阶段，运用两阶段DEA模型分别对2016年江苏省12个国家高新区、11个技术领域以及各高新区内不同技术类型企业的整体和分阶段创新效率进行测度，并构建Tobit回归模型探究每个阶段企业创新效率的影响因素。研究表明：(1)江苏省国家高新区整体创新效率有较大提升空间，其中技术开发效率表现优于经济转化效率。(2)高创新效率的技术领域集中在电子与信息、新材料等，生物医药、环境保护和光机电一体化等技术领域整体创新效率处于较低水平。(3)以各阶段创新效率均值为分界，划分创新资源利用的四种模式，大部分高新区企业处于高开发-低转化和低开发-高转化型模式，存在技术创新与经济转化联系不够紧密的现象。(4)资本投入水平、劳动力的“质”和“量”、政府支持力度对企业创新效率的影响存在明显的阶段差异性。最后，根据研究结果，从强化知识交流网络、集聚多元化人才、调整资源投入产出评估方式及采取扬优补短式效率提升路径四个方面给出提升高新区企业创新效率的政策建议。

Abstract: Under the background of the new normal of China’s economy, the innovation efficiency enhancement and quality improvement of enterprises in high-tech zones can prominently step up the innovation ability of high-tech zones. From the perspective of the innovation value chain, the innovation process of enterprise was classified as two stages, namely, technology development and economic transformation, in this article. More specifically, this article analyzed the overall innovation efficiency, technology development efficiency and economic transformation efficiency of twelve national high-tech zones, eleven technical fields and enterprises of different technical types in twelve national high-tech zones in Jiangsu Province in 2016, along with their influencing factors, by using two-stage DEA model and Tobit Regression model. The results show that: (1）national high-tech zones in Jiangsu Province still has great room for improvement in terms of the overall innovation efficiency, among which the technology development efficiency is slightly higher than the economic transformation efficiency. (2）The technical fields with high innovation efficiency mainly include electronic information, new materials, etc., while the overall innovation efficiency in the technical fields of biomedicine, environmental protection and opto-mechatronics are at a low level. (3）Four models of innovation resource utilization are classified based on boundary line with average efficiency of two stages. Most of enterprises are in high-development and low-transformation model, as well as low-development and high-transformation model, indicating the disconnection between technology innovation and economic transformation. (4）The influence of the level of capital input, high-quality labor force, workforce and government support on the innovation efficiency of enterprises is obviously different in different stages. Finally, according to the research results, the policy suggestions for improving innovation efficiency of enterprises in high-tech zones include strengthening the knowledge exchange network, retaining diversified talents, adjusting resource input and output evaluation methods and developing one’s strengths and making up one’s weaknesses.

储姗姗, 汪涛, 夏四友, 杨雪梅, 陈静. 创新价值链视角下企业创新效率差异及影响因素分析——基于江苏省国家高新区企业的验证[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(2): 269-279.

CHU Shan-shan, WANG Tao, XIA Si-you, YANG Xue-mei, CHEN Jing. Differences and Influencing Factors of Enterprise Innovation Efficiency Based on Innovation Value Chain:A Case Study on Enterprises of National High-tech Zones in Jiangsu Province[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2021, 30(2): 269-279.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究（Ⅰ）——蓄水前污染负荷现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 611 -622 .
[2]	王圣\| 王慧敏\| 朱法华\| 仇蕾\| 陈辉\| 孙雪丽. 我国火电行业NOX排放因子的样本容量确定方法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(9): 1067 .
[3]	吴晓\|吴宜进. 基于灰色关联模型的山地城市生态安全动态评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 385 .
[4]	周克昊，刘艳芳，谭荣辉. 长江中游城市群综合发展水平时空分异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1502 .
[5]	罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[6]	张梦薇, 吕成文. 丰乐河流域表层土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1420 .
[7]	张丽琴, 渠丽萍, 吕春艳, 李玲. 基于空间格局视角的武汉市土地生态系统服务价值研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1988 -1997 .
[8]	田雨周宝同付伟王蓉. 2000-2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究—以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[9]	曾源源, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进, . 长江中游经济带交通区位条件变化与建设用地扩张时空耦合规律[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2651 -2662 .
[10]	梁辉王春凯. 201904产业发展对城市蔓延影响的差异性分析—以长江经济带104个城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .

创新价值链视角下企业创新效率差异及影响因素分析——基于江苏省国家高新区企业的验证

Differences and Influencing Factors of Enterprise Innovation Efficiency Based on Innovation Value Chain:A Case Study on Enterprises of National High-tech Zones in Jiangsu Province

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

推荐阅读 10