长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (3): 626-637.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202303016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

成渝城市群景观生态风险演变分析

王玲,汪淼*   

  1. (西华大学建筑与土木工程学院,四川 成都 610000)
  • 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-04-19

Chengdu-chongqing Urban Landscape Ecological Risk Evolution Analysis

WANG Ling, WANG Miao   

  1. (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610000, China)
  • Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-04-19

摘要: 城市群尺度上的生态风险评价是目前急需研究的问题之一。以成渝城市群为研究区域,基于2000、2010、2020年的GlobeLand30数据集,引入景观生态风险指数,从景观生态学角度,运用地统计学与GIS软件进行空间分析,并结合半变异函数、空间自相关分析法等方法,分析了成渝城市群的景观格局变化并对其进行了生态风险评价。结果表明:(1)成渝城市群土地利用类型中建设用地逐年增多,总体耕地与草地面积减少,存在耕地垦殖现象;(2)成渝城市群的景观类型空间分布变得复杂和破碎;(3)成渝城市群生态风险指数整体呈提高的趋势,高生态风险区、较高生态风险区面积逐渐扩大。研究结果为该地区土地利用配置、生态安全格局构建提供参考。

Abstract: Ecological risk assessment on urban agglomeration scale is one of the problems urgently needed to be studied.Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration is taken as the research area. Based on the GlobeLand30 data set of 2000, 2010 and 2020, landscape ecological risk index is introduced. From the perspective of landscape ecology, geostatistics and GIS software are used to carry out spatial analysis, combined with semi-variational function and spatial autocorrelation analysis method.The change of landscape pattern in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration was analyzed and its ecological risk was evaluated.The results showed that: (1) construction land increased year by year in chengdu-chongqing urban agglomeration, while the total area of cultivated land and grassland decreased, and cultivated land reclamation existed; (2) The spatial distribution of landscape types in chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration becomes complicated and fragmented; (3) The overall ecological risk index of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration showed an increasing trend, and the area of high ecological risk area and high ecological risk area gradually expanded.The results of this study provide reference for land use allocation and ecological security pattern construction in this region.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[2] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[3] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[4] 刘冀, 孙周亮, 张特, 程雄, 董晓华, 谈新. 基于不同卫星降雨产品的澴水花园流域径流模拟比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2558 -2567 .
[5] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[6] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[7] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[8] 胡博亭, 柳江, 王文玲, 冯彦. 基于洪旱灾害的雅鲁藏布江流域水资源脆弱性时空差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1092 -1101 .
[9] 程俊翔, 徐力刚, 姜加虎, 朱乾德, 于丹丹. 洞庭湖出口径流变化及对生态系统的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1225 -1234 .
[10] 刘 松, 佘敦先, 张利平, 丁凯熙, 郭梦瑶, 陈森林. 基于Morris和Sobol的水文模型参数敏感性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1296 -1303 .