长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (12): 1903-1909.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201612014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良剂对湿地土壤团聚体及抗悬浮能力的影响试验

陈星1, 张平究1, 包先明2, 张璐璐1, 张海霞1, 韩燕青1   

  1. 1. 安徽师范大学国土资源与旅游学院 安徽自然灾害过程与防控研究省级重点实验室, 安徽 芜湖 241003;
    2. 淮北师范大学生命科学学院, 安徽 淮北 235000
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-03 修回日期:2016-08-25 出版日期:2016-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 张平究,E-mail:changpj2006@163.com E-mail:changpj2006@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈星(1989~),男,硕士研究生,主要从事湿地土壤生态研究.E-mail:775676465@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41301249);安徽省自然科学基金项目(No.1308085MB22);国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07103-005)

STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL AGGREGATE COMPOSITION, ANTI-SUSPENSION AND PHOSPHORUS RELEASE UNDER THE MODIFIERS ADDING IN WETLAND

CHEN Xing1, ZHANG Ping-jiu1, BAO Xian-ming2, ZHANG Lu-lu1, ZHANG Hai-xia1, HAN Yan-qing1   

  1. 1. Anhui Key Laboratory of Natural Disasters Process and Prevention/College of Territorial Resource and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, China;
    2. College of Life Sciences, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 235000, China
  • Received:2016-02-03 Revised:2016-08-25 Online:2016-12-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(41301249);Natural Science Foundation of Anhui(No.1308085MB22);National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project Technology(2012ZX07103-005)

摘要: 以巢湖十五里河河口湿地土壤为研究对象,选用PAM(J)、PAM+生物炭(SJ)和PAM+泥炭(NJ)为土壤结构改良剂,研究改良剂对淹水条件下培养后土壤水稳性团聚体数量、土壤抗悬浮能力和土壤磷释放的影响。结果表明,四种处理(CK、NJ、J和SJ)>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量大小顺序为:J(58.73±0.57%) > SJ(48.27±3.58%) > NJ(34.47±2.02%) > CK(2.31±0.15%)。在室内风浪扰动模拟实验中,扰动后上覆水体悬浮物浓度(SS)和水体磷浓度的大小顺序均是:CK > NJ > J > SJ,且CK显著大于NJ、J和SJ。添加PAM(J)、PAM+生物炭(SJ)和PAM+泥炭(NJ)不仅能显著提高>0.25 mm研究区湿地土壤水稳性团聚体的含量,也能显著增强风浪扰动下淹水土壤的抗悬浮能力,进而显著降低淹水后土壤磷释放能力,其中以添加PAM+生物炭组合提升淹水后湿地土壤抗悬浮和降低磷释放能力的效果最佳。

关键词: 结构改良剂, 水稳性团聚体, 抗悬浮, 水体磷, 巢湖

Abstract: Soils were collected from estuary wetland of Shiwuli River in the Chaohu Lake region. Influences of PAM(J), PAM+biochar(SJ) and PAM+peat(NJ) amendments on soil aggregates, anti-suspension and phosphorus release were studied after flood incubation. The results showed that >0.25mm soil water-stable aggregate contents were in the order:J(58.73±0.57%) > SJ(48.27±3.58%) > NJ(34.47±2.02%) > CK (no modifier treatment)(2.31±0.15%).On the laboratory simulated experiment of wind effect, soil suspension contents and total phosphorus in water were in the order:CK > NJ > J > SJ, CK was significantly higher than the else. Compared to CK, J, SJ and NJ increased the contents of >0.25mm water-stable aggregates,and enhanced the capability of soil anti-suspension, moreover, obviously reduced soil phosphorus release into waters. The SJ, was the best treatment to promote the capability of soil anti-suspension and reduce the phosphorus release into water.

Key words: structural modifier, water-stable aggregate, anti-suspension capability, total phosphorus, Chaohu lake

中图分类号: 

  • S151.9
[1] KRISTENSEN P, SØNDERGAARD M, JEPPESEN E. Resuspension in a shallow eutrophic lake[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1992, 228(1):101-109.
[2] HAMILTON D P, MITCHELL S F. An empirical model for sediment resuspension in shallow lakes[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1996, 317(3):209-220.
[3] 蔡启铭, 杨平. 太湖悬浮质对湖面反照率及水体光吸收的影响[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1991, 22(5):458-466.[CAI Q M, YANG P. Effects of suspended particles in Taihu lake on albedo and absorption[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 1991, 22(5):458-466.]
[4] 秦伯强, 范成新. 大型浅水湖泊内源营养盐释放的概念性模式探讨[J]. 中国环境科学, 2002, 22(2):150-153.[QIN B Q, FAN C X. Exploration of conceptual model of nutrient release from inner source in large shallow lake[J]. China Environmental Science, 2002, 22(2):150-153.]
[5] 尤本胜, 王同成, 范成新, 等. 太湖草型湖区沉积物再悬浮对水体营养盐的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2008, 29(1):26-31.[YOU B S, WANG T C, FAN C X, et al. Effects of sediment resuspension on aqueous nutrient loading in grass type zone of lake Taihu[J]. Environmental Science, 2008, 29(1):26-31.]
[6] 胡俊, 刘剑彤, 刘永定. 沉积物与悬浮物中磷分级分离形态差异的初步研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2005, 25(11):1517-1522.[HU J, LIU J T, LIU Y D. Study on the difference of phosphorus fractionations between the sediment and the suspended matter[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2005, 25(11):1517-1522.]
[7] SØNDERGAARD M, PEDER JENSEN J, JEPPESEN E. Role of sediment and internal loading of phosphorus in shallow lakes[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 506-509(1/3):135-145.
[8] 李大鹏, 黄勇. 扰动强度对太湖沉积物中磷释放及其形态转化的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(8):2614-2620.[LI D P, HUANG Y. Effect of disturbance intensity on phosphorus release and its transformation in the sediment from Taihu Lake[J]. Environmental Science, 2012, 33(8):2614-2620.]
[9] WANDER M M, BOLLERO G A. Soil quality assessment of tillage impacts in illinois[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1999, 63(4):961-971.
[10] BARTHÈS B, ROOSE E. Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to run off and erosion; validation at several levels[J]. CATENA, 2002, 47(2):133-149.
[11] 王虹艳, 吴士文, 马海洋, 等. 浙南易蚀土壤的团聚体稳定性及其稳定机理[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(2):429-433.[WANG H Y, WU S W, MA H Y, et al. Stability and it's mechanism of aggregates in easily eroded soils derived from purple rock in the south of Zhejiang province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(2):429-433.]
[12] 龙明杰, 张宏伟, 陈志泉, 等. 高聚物对土壤结构改良的研究III. 聚丙烯酰胺对赤红壤的改良研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2002, 33(1):9-13.[LONG M J, ZHANG H W, CHEN Z Q, et al. Studies on polymeric soil structure amendments III. amelioration to lateritic red soil by polyacrylamide[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2002, 33(1):9-13.]
[13] 曹丽花, 赵世伟, 赵勇钢, 等. 土壤结构改良剂对风沙土水稳性团聚体改良效果及机理的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(2):65-68.[CAO L H, ZHAO S W, ZHAO Y G, et al. Study on improvements of modifiers on soil water-stable aggregates and its mechanisms in Aeolian sandy soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(2):65-68.]
[14] 王旭东, 杨雪芹. 聚丙烯酰胺对磷素在土壤中吸附解析与迁移的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2006, 26(2):300-305.[WANG X D, YANG X Q. Effect of polyacrylamide on phosphorus adsorption, desorption and translocation[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006, 26(2):300-305.]
[15] 李丛蕾, 周际海, 袁颖红, 等. 改良剂对旱地红壤团聚体及有机碳分布的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):112-116.[LI C L, ZHOU J H, YUAN Y H, et al. Effects of soil amendments on distribution of water stable aggregates and organic carbon in upland red soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(3):112-116.]
[16] 杨晓亮, 李杰华, 彭婷婷, 等. 两种有机添加物对岩石边坡植被恢复人工土壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(1):21-25.[YANG X L, LI J H, PENG T T, et al. Effect of two organic amendments on anti-erodibility of synthetic soils for rock slope revegetation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(1):21-25.]
[17] 徐康, 刘付程, 安宗胜, 等. 巢湖表层沉积物中磷赋存形态的时空变化[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(11):3255-3263.[XU K, LIU F C, AN Z S, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of phosphorus forms in surface sediments of Chaohu Lake[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(11):3255-3263.]
[18] 员学锋, 汪有科, 吴普特, 等. PAM对土壤物理性状影响的试验研究及机理分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(2):37-40.[YUAN X F, WANG Y K, WU P T, et al. Effects and mechanism of PAM on soil physical characteristics[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 19(2):37-40.]
[19] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000:133-135.[LU R K. Methods of agricultural chemical analysis is soil[M]. Beijing:Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000:133-135.]
[20] SIX J, PAUSTIAN K, ELLIOTT E T, et al. Soil structure and organic matter:I distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64(2):681-689.
[21] 尤本胜, 王同成, 范成新, 等. 太湖沉积物再悬浮模拟方法[J]. 湖泊科学, 2007, 19(5):611-617.[YOU B S, WANG T C, FAN C X, et al. Quantitative simulative method of sediment resuspension in Lake Taihu[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2007, 19(5):611-617.]
[22] 刘恩科, 赵秉强, 梅旭荣, 等. 不同施肥处理对土壤水稳定性团聚体及有机碳分布的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(4):1035-1041.[LIU E K, ZHAO B Q, MEI X R, et al. Distribution of water-stable aggregates and organic carbon of arable soils affected by different fertilizer application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(4):1035-1041.]
[23] 晁建颖, 高光, 汤祥明, 等. 风浪扰动中太湖OA对水体磷循环影响的原位实验研究[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(10):2861-2867.[CHAO J Y, CAO G, TANG X M, et al. Effects of wind-induced wave on organic aggregates physical and chemical characteristics in a shallow eutrophic lake (Lake Taihu) in China[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(10):2861-2867.]
[24] 杨彭年. 石灰性土壤有机矿质复合体及其团聚性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 1984, 21(2):144-142.[YANG P N. Studies on properties of organo-mineral complex and aggregate in calcareous soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1984, 21(2):144-142.]
[25] 刘纪根, 雷廷武, 夏卫生, 等. 施加PAM的坡地降雨入渗过程及其模型研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(3):51-54.[LIU J G, LEI T W, XIA W S, et al. Processes and model of rainfall-infiltration on slope land treated with PAM[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(3):51-54.]
[26] 于健, 雷廷武, SHAINBERG I, 等. PAM特性对砂壤土入渗及土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(1):21-27.[YU J, LEI T W, SHAINBERG I, et al. Effects of molecular weight and degree of hydrolysis of pam on infiltrat ion and erosion of sandy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(1):21-27.]
[27] 唐泽军, 雷廷武, 张晴雯, 等. PAM增加降雨入渗减少土壤侵蚀的的模拟试验研究:I. 入渗[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(2):178-185.[TANG Z J, LEI T W, ZHANG Q W, et al. Effects of polyacrylamide application on infiltration and soil erosion under simulated rainfalls:I. infiltration[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(2):178-185.]
[28] 雷廷武, 唐泽军, 张晴雯, 等. 聚丙烯酰胺增加土壤降雨入渗减少侵蚀的模拟试验研究:II. 侵蚀[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(3):401-406.[LEI T W, TANG Z J, ZHANG Q W, et al. Effects of polyacrylamid application on infiltration and soil erosion under simulated rainfalls:II. erosion control[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(3):401-406.]
[29] 康倍铭, 徐健, 吴淑芳, 等. PAM与天然土壤改良材料混合对部分土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(3):68-72, 78.[KANG B M, XU J, WU S F, et al. Effect of combination of polyacrylamide (PAM)and natural improvement material on some soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(3):68-72, 78.]
[30] 逄勇, 颜润润, 余钟波, 等. 风浪作用下的底泥悬浮沉降及内源释放量研究[J]. 环境科学, 2008, 29(9):2456-2463.[PANG Y, YAN R R, YU Z B, et al. Suspension-sedimentation of sediment and release amount of internal load in Lake Taihu affected by wind[J]. Environmental Science, 2008, 29(9):2456-2463.]
[31] 胡开明, 逄勇, 余辉, 等. 基于底泥再悬浮试验的太湖水质模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(S1):94-99.[HU K M, PANG Y, YU H, et al. Simulation study on water quality based on sediment resuspended experiment in lake Taihu[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(S1):94-99.]
[32] 潘成荣, 张之源, 叶琳琳, 等. 环境条件变化对瓦埠湖沉积物磷释放的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(6):148-152.[PAN C R, ZHANG Z Y, YE L L, et al. Effects of environmental factor on phosphorus release from sediments in Wabuhu Lake[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(6):148-152.]
[33] 谢贻发, 胡耀辉, 刘正文, 等. 沉积物再悬浮对沉水植物生长的影响研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(1):18-22.[XIE Y F, HU Y H, LU Z W, et al. Effects of sediment resuspension on the growth of submerged plants[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(1):18-22.]
[34] 朱广伟, 秦伯强, 高光. 风浪扰动引起大型浅水湖泊内源磷暴发性释放的直接证据[J]. 科学通报, 2005, 50(1):66-71.[ZHU G W, QIN B Q, GAO G. Direct evidence of phosphorus outbreak release from sediment to overlying water in a large shallow lake caused by strong wind wave disturbance[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2005, 50(6):577-582.]
[35] 王萌萌, 周启星. 生物炭的土壤环境效应及其机制研究[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 32(5):768-780.[WANG M M, ZHOU Q X. Environmental effects and their mechanisms of biochar applied to soils[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(5):768-780.]
[36] 杨雪芹, 胡田田, 王旭东, 等. 聚丙烯酰胺对磷素在土壤中吸附一解吸的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(1):87-90.[YANG X Q, HU T T, WANG X D, et al. Effect on PAM on phosphorus adsorption and desorption in lou soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(1):87-90.]
[1] 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 陈翼翔, 张媛. 区域洪涝灾害恢复力时空演变研究——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1384-1394.
[2] 黄木易, 何翔. 巢湖流域土地景观格局变化及生态风险驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 743-750.
[3] 李国莲, 谢发之, 张瑾, 陈广洲, 汪静柔. 巢湖水及沉积物中总磷的分布变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 830-836.
[4] 钱红, 严云志, 储玲, 朱仁, 高俊峰, 蔡永久. 巢湖流域河流鱼类群落的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 257-264.
[5] 匡武, 芮明, 张彦辉, 严云志, 吴添天. 巢湖湖滨带生态恢复工程对暴雨径流氮磷削减效果研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1906-1912.
[6] 姚飞, 陈龙乾, 张宇, 吴沛瑶, 张红梅, 王秉义. 巢湖水陆交错带生态服务价值梯度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1568-1576.
[7] 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 戴梦琴, 王祥, 康海迪. 基于DEMATEL的区域洪涝灾害恢复力影响因素及评价指标体系研究——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1577-1583.
[8] 程先富, 戴梦琴, 郝丹丹, 吴庆双. 基于情景分析的区域洪涝灾害风险评价——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1418-1424.
[9] 张志明, 高俊峰, 闫人华. 基于水生态功能区的巢湖环湖带生态服务功能评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1110-1118.
[10] 吴开亚, 王玲杰. 巢湖流域大气污染的经济损失分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 781-781.
[11] 姚书春,薛 滨,李世杰, 刘吉峰, 夏威岚. 长江中下游湖泊沉积速率的测定及环境意义——以洪湖、巢湖、太湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 569-573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 杨 选. 国内外典型水治理模式及对武汉水治理的借鉴[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[3] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[4] 李恒鹏,杨桂山,刘晓玫,万荣荣. 流域土地利用变化的长周期水文效应及管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[5] 廖顺宝,李泽辉. 四川省人口分布与土地利用的关系及人口数据空间化试验[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[6] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[7] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 董林水, 张旭东, 周金星, 李冬雪. 青藏铁路沿线北段植被物种丰富度及盖度的动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 551 .
[10] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .