长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (06): 824-831.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201706004

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海郊区三类典型生境的两栖类分布特征

李贲1, 张伟1, 束潇潇1, 莫英敏1, 裴恩乐2, 袁晓2, 王天厚1   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学生命科学学院, 上海 200241;
    2. 上海野生动植物保护管理站, 上海 200233
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-29 修回日期:2017-01-23 出版日期:2017-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 王天厚,E-mail:thwang@bio.ecnu.edu.cn E-mail:thwang@bio.ecnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李贲(1990~),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为动物生态学.E-mail:benlee19@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市绿化与市容管理局项目(F131508)

DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTIC OF AMPHIBIAN IN THREE TYPICAL HABITATS OF RURAL SHANGHAI

LI Ben1, ZHANG Wei1, SHU Xiao-xiao1, MO Ying-min1, PEI En-le2, YUAN Xiao2, WANG Tian-hou1   

  1. 1. School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;
    2. Department of Wildlife Protection Administration, Shanghai 200233, China
  • Received:2016-11-29 Revised:2017-01-23 Online:2017-06-20
  • Supported by:
    Shanghai Landscaping and City Appearance Administrative Bureau Project (F131508)

摘要: 上海郊区农田,林地,湿地(池塘)三类典型生境是两栖类最主要的栖息地,生境的差异以及两栖类生态特征的不同造成了两栖类在分布上的差异。2014年和2016年5~8月对上海郊区三类典型生境的30个研究样点两栖类生物多样性进行调查,并运用单因素方差分析对三类生境的两栖类群落结构进行比较,通过层次聚类法分析不同生境的两栖类组成相似性。结果显示:(1)两年间共记录到上海郊区两栖类动物1目4科4属5种5 397只,其中泽陆蛙(Fejervarya multistriata),金线侧褶蛙(Pelophylax plancyi)为优势种。黑斑侧褶蛙(Pelophylax nigromaculata),中华蟾蜍(Bufo gargarizans),饰纹姬蛙(Microhyla fissipes)为常见种。这5种两栖类都为广型分布种。(2)三类生境的两栖类物种丰富度无显著性差异,而两栖类多度差异显著。(3)泽陆蛙,饰纹姬蛙的种群密度在三类生境中差异显著,且在农田生境中最高。黑斑侧褶蛙,金线侧褶蛙的种群密度在三类生境中差异显著且在池塘生境中最高。中华蟾蜍在三类生境中的种群密度无显著性差异。(4)聚类结果为30个研究样点中林地生境与池塘生境被聚为一类,农田生境被单独聚为一类。建议通过对不同生境的保护与恢复达到对上海郊区两栖类生物多样性保护的目的。

关键词: 两栖类, 群落结构, 种群密度, 上海, 郊区生境

Abstract: Cropland, woodland and wetland (pond) were three main typical habitats for amphibians in rural Shanghai, the difference of habitats and amphibian ecological characteristics caused diverse distribution of amphibians. From May to August in 2014 and 2016, amphibian biodiversity survey were conducted in 30 study sites of three typical habitats in rural Shanghai. One-Way ANOVA was used to compare the amphibian community structure across three habitats in rural Shanghai, hierarchical clustering method was undertaken to analyze the similarity of amphibian community structure in different habitat. The results showed that a total of 5 397 anuran individuals were recorded in two years, belonging to 1 order, 4 families, 4 genera and 5 species. The dominant species of amphibian in rural Shanghai were Fejervarya multistriata and Pelophylax plancyi, meanwhile Pelophylax nigromaculata, Bufo gargarizans and Microhyla fissipes were common species. All five amphibian species were defined as wide distribution species. There were significant differences in the species richness of amphibian among the rural habitats, but we did not find any corresponding significant differences in the abundance. F. multistriata and M. fissipes had a significant higher population density in cropland habitat. P. nigromaculata and P. plancyi had a significant higher population density in pond habitat. We did not find significant difference in population densities of B. gargarizans among different habitats. The results of cluster method indicated that woodland and pond habitats were classified into the same group, however, the cropland habitats were classified into another one. Our study suggests that habitat protection and restoration in rural Shanghai is one of the key issues to undertake the biodiversity conservation for amphibians.

Key words: amphibian, community structure, population density, Shanghai, rural habitat

中图分类号: 

  • S931
[1] 武正军, 李义明. 两栖类种群数量下降原因及保护对策[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(1):140-146.[WU Z J, LI Y M. Causes and conservation strategies of amphibian population declination[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(1):140-146.]
[2] BIEK R, FUNK W C, MAXELL B A, et al. What is missing in amphibian decline research:insights from ecological sensitivity analysis[J]. Conservation Biology, 2002, 16(3):728-734.
[3] CUSHMAN S A. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians:a review and prospectus[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006, 128(2):231-240.
[4] HAMER A J, MCDONNELL M J. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world:a review[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(10):2432-2449.
[5] BAILLIE J, HILTON-TAYLOR C, STUART S N. 2004 IUCN red list of threatened speciesTM:a global species assessment[M]. Gland, Switzerland:The World Conservation Union Press, 2004.
[6] YANG G, XU J, WANG Y, et al. Evaluation of microhabitats for wild birds in a Shanghai urban area park[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015, 14(2):246-254.
[7] LI B, ZHANG W, SHU X X, et al. The impacts of urbanization on the distribution and body condition of the rice-paddy frog (Fejervarya multistriata) and gold-striped pond Frog (Pelophylax plancyi) in Shanghai, China[J]. Asian Herpetological Research, 2016, 7(3):200-209.
[8] ZHANG W, LI B, SHU X X, et al. A new record of Kaloula (Amphibia:Anura:Microhylidae) in Shanghai, China[J]. Asian Herpetological Research, 2015, 6(3):240-244.
[9] 上海市农林局. 上海陆生野生动植物资源[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2004.[Shanghai Municipal Agricultural and Forestry Bureau. Shanghai terrestrial wildlife resources[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2004.]
[10] ZHANG W, LI B, SHU X X, et al. Responses of anuran communities to rapid urban growth in Shanghai, China[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 20:365-374.
[11] 栾晓峰, 刘俊峰, 胡忠军, 等. 上海郊区冬夏季鸟类群落特征比较[J]. 动物学杂志, 2003, 38(3):69-76.[LUAN X F, LIU J F, HU Z J, et al. Summer and winter avian communities in Shanghai suburban area[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2003, 38(3):69-76.]
[12] 栾晓峰, 胡忠军, 徐宏发. 上海农耕区鸟类群落特征及与几种生境因子的关系[J]. 动物学研究, 2004, 25(1):20-26.[LUAN X F, HU Z J, XU H F. Features of avian community and their relationships with habitats in Shanghai agricultural area[J]. Zoological Research, 2004, 25(1):20-26.]
[13] 王晶琳, 薛文杰, 李乃兵, 等. 上海农田泽蛙蛰眠状况初步调查[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(10):1289-1291.[WANG J L, XUE W J, LI N B, et al. Hibernation of Rana limnocharis in Shanghai farmland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(10):1289-1291.]
[14] 王晓黎, 王晶琳, 姜海瑞, 等. 上海郊区农田泽蛙种群动态和肥满度状况初探[J]. 四川动物, 2007, 26(2):424-427.[WANG X L, WANG J L, JIANG H R, et al. Primary survey on relative fatness and population of Rana limnocharis lived in Shanghai suburb farm[J]. Sichuan Journey of Zoology, 2007, 26(2):424-427.]
[15] 王力军, 洪美玲, 袁 晓, 等. 上海市区主要公园两栖爬行动物多样性调查[J]. 四川动物, 2011, 30(1):69-73.[WANG L J, HONG M L, YUAN X, et al. Survey on the diversity of amphibians and reptiles in the main parks in the urban district of Shanghai[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2011, 30(1):69-73.]
[16] 周 洲, 谢 锋, 江建平, 等. 两栖动物种群衰退研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2004, 10(1):128-132.[ZHOU Z, XIE F, JIANG J P, et al. Research advances of amphibian declines[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2004, 10(1):128-132.]
[17] GUERRY A D, HUNTER JR M L. Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture:an examination of landscape composition and configuration[J]. Conservation Biology, 2002, 16(3):745-754.
[18] 黄正一, 孙振华, 虞 快. 上海鸟类资源及其生境[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社, 1993.[HUANG Z Y, SUN Z H, YU K. Bird resources and habitats in Shanghai[M]. Shanghai:Fudan University Press, 1993.]
[19] 上海市统计局. 2015上海统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2015.[Shanghai Municipal Statistics Bureau. Shanghai statistical yearbook 2015[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2015.]
[20] 蔡友铭, 周云轩. 上海湿地[M]. 2版. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2014.[CAI Y M, ZHOU Y X. Shanghai wetlands[M]. 2nd ed. Shanghai:Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2014.]
[21] CRUMP M L, SCOTT JR N J. Visual encounter survey[M]//HEYER W R, DONNELLY M A, MCDIARMID R, et al. Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity, Standard Methods for Amphibians. Washington, DC:Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994.
[22] 丁 平, 诸葛阳. 浙江古田山自然保护区鸟类群落生态研究[J]. 生态学报, 1989, 9(2):121-127.[DING P, ZHUGE Y. Community ecology birds on area of Gu Tian Mountain Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1989, 9(2):121-127.]
[23] 黄正一, 周满章, 宗 愉, 等. 上海地区的国家保护动物[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社, 1991.[HUANG Z Y, ZHOU M Z, ZONG Y, et al. National protect animals in Shanghai[M]. Shanghai:Fudan University Press, 1991.]
[24] FAHRIG L, BAUDRY J, BROTONS L, et al. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes[J]. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14(2):101-112.
[25] SUÁREZ R P, ZACCAGNINI M E, BABBITT K J, et al. Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31(10):2485-2505.
[26] 吴 迪, 岳 峰, 罗祖奎, 等. 上海大莲湖湖泊湿地两栖动物群落分布及生境选择模式[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2011, 50(3):268-273.[WU D, YUE F, LUO Z K, et al. The distribution and habitat selection patterns of amphibian population in Dalian Lake wetland, Shanghai[J]. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science), 2011, 50(3):268-273.]
[27] 王彦平, 武正军, 陆 萍, 等. 宁波地区黑斑蛙的繁殖生态和产卵地选择[J]. 动物学研究, 2007, 28(2):186-192.[WANG Y P, WU Z J, LU P, et al. Breeding ecology and oviposition site selection of Black-spotted pond frogs (Rana nigromaculata) in Ningbo, China[J]. Zoological Research, 2007, 28(2):186-192.]
[28] SMALLBONE L T, LUCK G W, WASSENS S. Anuran species in urban landscapes:relationships with biophysical, built environment and socio-economic factors[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2011, 101(1):43-51.
[29] GAGNÉ S A, FAHRIG L. Effect of landscape context on anuran communities in breeding ponds in the National Capital Region, Canada[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22(2):205-215.
[1] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419-2424.
[2] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529-2539.
[3] 杨洋, 张玮, 潘宏博, 顾琬雯, 郝瑞娟, 熊春晖, 王丽卿. 滆湖轮虫群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 832-840.
[4] 田凯, 汪正祥, 雷耘, 李中强, 潘磊, 李亭亭. 鄂西北六个自然保护区鱼类群落结构及多样性比较[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 384-393.
[5] 胡俊, 郑金秀, 池仕运, 董方勇. 苏皖交界河网区浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子关系的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 282-288.
[6] 汤勇, 张薇, 薛俊增, 陈立婧. 长江口大洋山近岸水域浮游植物群落及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1176-1183.
[7] 史军, 穆海振, 徐家良, 马悦. 上海近海海域低层风特性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1184-1190.
[8] 李文浩, 张萌, 门吉帅, 敖雪夫, 胡新艳, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 江西仙女湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1218-1227.
[9] 荆锐, 陈江龙, 田柳. 国家级新区发展异质性及驱动机制研究——以上海浦东新区和南京江北新区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 859-867.
[10] 周天舒, 张亚, 唐文乔, 王丽卿. 基于鱼类完整性指数的黄浦江水生态系统评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 895-903.
[11] 刘凯, 段金荣, 徐东坡, 周彦锋, 徐跑. 怀洪新河太湖新银鱼国家级水产种质资源保护区生境及渔业群落多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 395-403.
[12] 钱红, 严云志, 储玲, 朱仁, 高俊峰, 蔡永久. 巢湖流域河流鱼类群落的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 257-264.
[13] 何勇凤, 李昊成, 王旭歌, 朱永久, 杨德国. 长湖鱼类群落结构的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 265-273.
[14] 史军, 穆海振. 大城市应对气候变化的可持续发展研究——以上海为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 1-8.
[15] 宁秀红, 赵敏. 土地整治驱动下土地利用和景观格局变化研究——以上海市合庆镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 79-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李燕玲, 刘爱民. 长江流域冬季农业主要作物的耕地竞争机制及案例研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 146 .
[2] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[3] 简敏菲,弓晓峰,游 海,黄志中,朱 捷. 鄱阳湖水土环境及其水生维管束植物重金属污染[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 589 -593 .
[4] 王海英,宫渊波,陈林武. 不同植被恢复模式下土壤微生物及酶活性的比较——以嘉陵江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 201 -206 .
[5] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[6] 向云波,徐长乐,彭秀芬. 长江三角洲城市群循环经济发展水平的空间格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 661 .
[7] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[8] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[9] 丰志勇,曾 刚. 上海市工业园区投资环境评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 274 -280 .
[10] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .