长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (05): 846-852.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201505018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江辽瓦店全新世黄土-古土壤序列风化过程及古洪水事件记录

吴帅虎, 庞奖励, 程和琴, 黄春长, 查小春, 杨建超   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院, 陕西 西安710062; 2.华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室, 上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-31 修回日期:2014-06-08 出版日期:2015-05-20
  • 作者简介:吴帅虎(1986~),男,博士研究生,主要从事自然地理学研究.E-mail:wushuaihuxiaolaoda@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(41271108);国家自然科学基金项目(41271108,41340044)

WEATHERING INTENSITY VARIATIONS IN A HOLOCENE LOESS-PALEOSOL PROFILE FROM UPPER-HANJIANG CATCHMENT IN CENTRAL CHINA

WU Shuai-hu, PANG Jiang-li, CHENG He-qin, HUANG Chun-chang, ZHA Xiao-chun, YANG Jian-chao   

  1. 1. College of Tourism and Environment, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China; 2. State Key Laboratary of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2014-03-31 Revised:2014-06-08 Online:2015-05-20
  • Contact: 庞奖励 E-mail:jlpang@snnu.edu.cn

摘要: 对汉江上游谷地包含古洪水滞流沉积层的辽瓦店(LWD)全新世黄土-古土壤剖面的常量元素含量、粘粒含量、磁化率和Rb/Sr比值等指标进行了对比分析。结果发现:在LWD剖面的风化成壤过程中, 元素Na、Mg和Al表现为较强烈的迁移淋失, 虽然元素K、Fe和Ca有一定程度的迁移淋失, 但比较微弱, 呈现Na>Mg>Al>K>Fe>Ca>Si的迁移序列;磁化率、Rb/Sr、CIA值、钾纳比(K2O/N2O)和淋溶系数的分布随地层的变化而同步变化。上述变化指示古土壤S0形成时期, 气候温暖湿润, 成壤作用强烈, 马兰黄土L1堆积时期气候寒冷干旱, 风化成壤作用最弱, 黄土L0堆积时期气候有所好转, 风化成壤作用强于马兰黄土堆积时期, 但弱于古土壤形成时期。古土壤S0形成的全新世中期可能出现过一次较为暖湿的次级环境变化, 在剖面中上部夹有一层古洪水滞流沉积层(SWD), 呈灰白色(10YR6/1), 为十分均匀的细粉砂, 与上下相邻地层呈突变接触关系且界线清晰, 向垂直河岸方向快速尖灭, 是一次剧烈的气候突变事件的产物。

关键词: 汉江上游, 全新世, 黄土, 古土壤, 风化程度

Abstract: The Holocene sediment profile was surveyed in detail and sampled systematically at the Liaowadian site on the first river terrace in the upper Hanjiang valley. The stratigraphic and sedimentological characteristics, pedogenic modification characteristics and the profile structure were investigated in the field. Magnetic susceptibility, particle-size distribution, geochemical characteristics and optical simulated luminescence (OSL) age were analyzed in laboratory. Based on the stratigraphic correlation and OSL dating, the chronologic framework of the LWD profile was established as follows: Malan loess L1 was accumulated in the last glacial period; the transitional loess Lt was accumulated in the early Holocene (11 500 ~ 8 500 a B.P.);the palaeosols (S0) was formed in the middle Holocene(8 500 ~ 3 100 a B.P.);Holocene loess L0 was accumulated in the late Holocene (3 100 a B.P. so far). A detailed study comparing the contents of major elements, content of clay, magnetic susceptibility, Rb/Sr ratio, CIA, (K2O/N2O), (CaO+K2O+N2O)/Al2O3 was conducted in this paper to explore the environmental features in the Holocene. The analytical results show that, Na, Mg and Al are relatively intensive leached, K, Fe and Ca are leached in a certain extent, and the element mobility and migration ability of the major elements are ranked in the following order: Na>Mg>Al>K>Fe>Ca>Si. The distributions of content of clay, magnetic susceptibility, Rb/Sr ratio, CIA, (K2O/N2O), (CaO+K2O+N2O)/Al2O3 imply that during the palaeosols (S0) formation, chemical weathering was intense, and the climate was warmer and wetter, the leaching and migrating was intense, the stage of Malan loess L1 accumulation, weathering intensity was weakened, and the climate turned to be relatively dry, the leaching and migrating was not conspicuous. During the stage of Holocene loess L0 accumulation, the climate turned to be improved, the weathering intensity was between those during palaeosols (S0) formation and Malan loess L1 accumulation, the leaching and migrating was weaker. The CIA, (K2O/N2O) and (CaO+K2O+N2O)/Al2O3 of 205-165 cm layer during palaeosols (S0) formation occurred significant changes: the CIA and(K2O/N2O) have an obvious peak area, and the(CaO+K2O+N2O)/Al2O3 have an obvious low ebb area, which indicate the weathering and pedogenic modification was intense and there may be a secondary environmental change that the climate became relatively warm and wet. The palaeoflood slackwater deposits (SWD) was lied in the middle-upper of the profile, presenting gray-white(10 YR6/1), homogeneous texture, loose, very uniform fine slit, the stratigraphic boundary of its upper and lower adjacent showed a mutation relationship and clear boundaries. To direction of vertical bank of river tip off quickly, the palaeoflood SWD samples was OSL dated to 1 810-1 710 a B.P. (AD 200-300), which is equal to the Eastern Han dynasty to Wei Jin era (AD 25-316), indicating that a dramatic climate change event for the upper-Hangjiang catchment occurred in the end of Eastern Han dynasty during the late Holocene, which caused catastrophic floods in the upper-Hangjiang catchment.

Key words: Hanjiang River, holocene, loess, paleosol, weathering intensity

中图分类号: 

  • P531
[1] 黄春长, 严军平.关中盆地全新世大暖期当中区域性干旱气候研究[C]//中国地理学会自然地理专业委员会编.资源产业化开发与生态环境建设.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1999:11-19.
[2] 文启忠, 刁桂仪, 贾蓉芬, 等.黄土剖面中古气候变化的地球化学记录[J].地球化学, 1995(3):223-231.
[3] 陈骏, 安芷生, 刘连文, 等.最近2.5Ma以来黄土高原风尘化学组成的变化与亚洲内陆的化学风化[J].中国科学D辑, 2011, 31(2):135-144.
[4] YANG J, CHEN J, AN Z, et al.Variations in 87Sr/86Sr ratios of calcites in Chinese loess:A proxy for chemical weathering associated with the East Asian summer monsoon[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeo-climatology, Palaeoecology, 2000, 157(1-2):151-159.
[5] 杨杰东, 陈骏, 刘连文, 等.2.5 Ma 以来黄土高原灵台剖面黄土-古土壤87Sr /86Sr比值的变化[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 39(6):731-734.
[6] 刁桂仪, 文启忠.黄土风化成土过程中主要元素迁移序列[J].地质地球化学, 1999, 27(1):21-26.
[7] 丁峰, 丁仲礼.塔吉克斯坦黄土的化学风化历史及古气候意义[J].中国科学(D 辑), 2003, 33(6):505-512.
[8] 康建成, 穆德芬.甘肃临夏北塬黄土剖面地球化学特征[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 34(2):119-125.
[9] 孙继敏, 刁桂仪, 文启忠, 等.用黄土地球化学参数进行古气候定量估算的初步尝试[J].地球化学, 1999, 28(3):265-272.
[10] 孙继敏, 许立亮.8 Ma以来黄土高原风尘堆积的物源变化与上地壳演化的关系[J].第四纪研究, 2007, 27(2):187-192.
[11] 贾耀锋, 黄春长, 庞奖励, 等.全新世黄土剖面Li/Ba值变化及其古气候意义[J].第四纪研究, 2005, 25(6):770-776.
[12] HAO Q Z, GUO Z T, QIAO Y S.Geochemical evidence for the provenance of middle Pleistocene loess deposits in southern China[J].Quaternary Science Reviews, 2010, 29:3317-3326.
[13] 庞奖励, 黄春长, 周亚利, 等.汉江上游谷地全新世风成黄土及其成壤改造特征[J].地理学报, 2011, 66(11):1562-1573.
[14] HUANG C C, PANG J L, ZHAO J B.Chinese loess and the evolution of the East Asia monsoon[J].Progress in Physical Geography, 2000, 24:75-96.
[15] HAN J M, LV H Y, WU N Q, et al.Magnetic susceptibility ofmodern soils in China and climate conditions[J].Studio Geophysica et Geodeti-ca, 1996, 40:262-275.
[16] MAHER B A.Magnetic propertiesofmodern soil and quaternary loessic paleosols:Palaeoclimatic implications[J].Palaeo-geography, Palaeocli-matology, Palaeoecology, 1998, 137:25-54.
[17] 陈骏, 季峻峰, 仇纲, 等.陕西洛川黄土化学风化程度的地球化学研究[J].中国科学:D辑, 1997, 27(6):531-536.
[18] NESBITT H W, MARKOVICS G, PRICE R C.Chemical processes affect-ing alkalis and alkaline earths during continental weathering[J].Geochem Cosmochim Acta, 1980, 44(11):1659-1666.
[19] MCLENNAN S M.Weathering and global denudation[J].Journal of Geology, 1993, 101:295-303.
[20] 李徐生, 韩志勇, 杨守业, 等.镇江下蜀土剖面的化学风化强度与元素迁移特征[J].地理学报, 2007, 62(11):1174-1184.
[21] 王丽娟, 庞奖励, 黄春长, 等.甜水沟全新世黄土-古土壤序列风化程度及意义[J].地理科学进展, 2011, 30(3):379-384.
[22] 叶玮, YABUKI S, KANAYAMA S.中国西风区黄土常量元素地球化学行为与古环境[J].干旱区地理, 2003, 26(1):23-29.
[23] 陈旸, 陈骏, 刘连文.甘肃西峰晚第三纪红粘土的化学组成及化学风化特征[J].地质力学学报, 2001, 7(2):167-175.
[24] 文启忠, 刁桂仪, 贾蓉芬, 等.黄土剖面中古气候变化的地球化学记录[J].第四纪研究, 1995(3):223-231.
[25] 陈敬安, 万国江, 黄荣贵, 等.程海近代气候变化的化学记录[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2000, 20(1):39-42.
[26] HUANG C C, PANG J L, ZHOU Q Y, et al.Holocene pedogen-ic change and the emergence and decline of rain-fed ce-real agriculture on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Quaterna-ry Science Reviews, 2004, 23(23):2525-2535.
[27] 庞奖励, 黄春长, 刘安娜, 等.黄土高原南部全新世黄土-古土壤序列若干元素分布特征及意义[J].第四纪研究, 2007, 27(3):257-364.
[1] 张玉柱, 黄春长, 庞奖励, 查小春, 周亚利, 石彬楠, 李晓刚. 基于HEC-RAS模型的汉江上游旬阳西段超长尺度古水文演化重建[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 755-764.
[2] 张文桐, 庞奖励, 周亚利, 黄春长, 查小春, 崔天宇. 湖北郧西县庹家湾剖面粒度组成特征及其环境意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1910-1916.
[3] 史超, 夏军, 佘敦先, 万蕙, 黄金凤. 气候变化下汉江上游林地植被生态需水量的时空演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 580-589.
[4] 李思悦 刘文治 顾胜 韩鸿印 张全发. null[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 275-280.
[5] 史威,朱诚,王富葆,田晓四,. 渝东峡江区全新世环境考古与环境变迁研究现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 222-222.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孟爱云, 濮励杰. 区域耕地数量变化与工业化、城市化进程相互关系探讨——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 237 .
[2] 田晓四, 陈 杰,朱 诚,朱同林. 南京市经济增长与工业“三废”污染水平计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 410 .
[3] 贾泽露,. GIS与SDM集成构建土地定级专家信息系统的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 323 .
[4] 胥 晓|郑伯川|陈友军. 嘉陵江流域植被景观的空间格局特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 373 .
[5] 谢 洪,钟敦伦,李 泳,韦方强. 长江上游泥石流灾害的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 94 -99 .
[6] 崔 鸿, 汪 亮,. 略论我国长江渔业资源的法律保护[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 58 -60 .
[7] 徐慧娟,黎育红,孙燕. 长江宜昌水文站流量、含沙量和悬移质粒度关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 110 -115 .
[8] 张信宝,曹植菁, 艾南山. 溪洛渡水电工程拦沙对三峡水库富营养化潜在影响的初步研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 170 .
[9] 邓志强,任淑花. 长株潭地区经济增长与工业污染变迁的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 517 .
[10] 胡海胜,郑艳萍. 庐山研究的文献分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 66 -71 .