川中丘陵区柏木边坡防护林对相邻农田大型土壤动物群落的影响

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201608018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究川中丘陵区柏木（Cupressus funebris）边坡防护林对相邻农田中大型土壤动物群落的影响，分别以油菜（Brassica campestris L.）地和玉米（Zea mays L.）地为研究样地，分别调查了有边坡防护林和无边坡防护林农田的大型土壤动物类群数、密度、多样性和生物量。结果显示：共捕获大型土壤动物4 525只，隶属3门8纲18目25科。优势类群为正蚓科、蚁科、链胃蚓科和地幺蚣科，常见类群为铗科、蟋蟀总科、地蜈蚣科、大赤螨科、狼蛛科和跳蛛科。有边坡防护林的农田大型土壤动物类群数、密度、多样性指数和生物量均明显高于无边坡防护林农田（P<0.05）。距边坡防护林5 m处的大型土壤动物类群数、密度、多样性指数明显低于0 m处（P<0.05）。对大型土壤动物进行功能群划分后发现，边坡防护林明显增加了植食性、捕食性和腐食性土壤动物数量，对杂食性大型土壤动物数量影响不明显。结果表明川中丘陵区柏木边坡防护林促进了相邻农田大型土壤动物群落的发展，但随着距离的增加其对农田大型土壤动物群落的影响逐渐减弱。

关键词: 柏木, 农田, 大型土壤动物, 群落, 川中丘陵区

Abstract: In order to reveal the effects of cypress slope shelterbelts on soil macrofauna communities in adjacent crop field, rape field and maize field were selected as the study sites, and soil macrofauna class group, density, diversity and biomass were investigated in slope shelterbelt fields and no slope shelterbelt fields, respectively. The results showed that total 4525 soil macrofauna were captured, which belonged to 3 phylum, 8 class, 18 order and 25 family. The dominant families were Lumbricidae, Formicidae, Moniligastridae and Geophilellidae. The ordinary families were Japygidae, Grylloidea, Geophilidae, Anystidae, Lycosidae and Salticidae. Family number, density, diversity index and biomass of soil macrofauna in slope shelterbelt fields were significantly higher than that in no slope shelterbelt fields (P<0.05). Furthermore, family number, density, diversity index of soil macrofauna in 5m were obviously lower than that in 0m to shelterbelt (P<0.05). Finally, the density of herbivore, predator and detritivore also increased in near slope shelterbelt fields. The influence, however, on density of omnivore were not obvious. The results indicated that cypress slope shelterbelts promoted the development of soil macrofauna in adjacent crop fields. Nevertheless, the influence to soil macrofauna was declined with the increase of distance to shelterbelts.

Key words: cypress, crop field, soil macrofauna, community, hilly area of central Sichuan basin

中图分类号:

S154.5

吕严凤, 蒋容, 鲜骏仁, 杨远祥, 杨占彪. 川中丘陵区柏木边坡防护林对相邻农田大型土壤动物群落的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1299-1307.

LV Yan-feng, JIANG Rong, XIAN Jun-ren, YANG Yuan-xiang, YANG Zhan-biao. EFFECTS OF CYPRESS SLOPE SHELTERBELT ON SOIL MACROFAUNA COMMUNITIES IN ADJACENT CROP FIELD IN HILLY AREA OF CENTRAL SICHUAN BASIN[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(08): 1299-1307.

参考文献

[1] DE BARROS FERRAZ S F, VETTORAZZI C A, THEOBALD D M, et al. Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central Rondônia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 204(1): 69-85.
[2] HUERTA E, VAN DER WAL H. Soil macroinvertebrates' abundance and diversity in home gardens in Tabasco, Mexico, vary with soil texture, organic matter and vegetation cover[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2012, 50: 68-75.
[3] BRUSSAARD L, CARON P, CAMPBELL B, et al. Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2010, 2(1/2): 34-42.
[4] NOBLE J C, WHITFORD W G, KALISZWESKI M. Soil and litter microarthropod populations from two contrasting ecosystems in semi-arid eastern Australia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1996, 32(3): 329-346.
[5] MARICHAL R, GRIMALDI M, FEIJOO M A, et al. Soil macroinvertebrate communities and ecosystem services in deforested landscapes of Amazonia[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2014, 83: 177-185.
[6] AYUKE F O, PULLEMAN M M, VANLAUWE B, et al. Agricultural management affects earthworm and termite diversity across humid to semi-arid tropical zones[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2011, 140(1/2): 148-154.
[7] CURRY J P, BYRNE D, SCHMIDT O. Intensive cultivation can drastically reduce earthworm populations in arable land[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2002, 38(2): 127-130.
[8] 范志平, 曾德慧, 朱教君, 等. 农田防护林生态作用特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(4): 130-133, 140.[FAN Z P, ZENG D H, ZHU J J, et al. Advance in characteristics of ecological effects of farmland shelterbelts[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 16(4): 130-133, 140.]
[9] RAHMAN P M, VARMA R V, SILESHI G W. Abundance and diversity of soil invertebrates in annual crops, agroforestry and forest ecosystems in the Nilgiri biosphere reserve of Western Ghats, India[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2012, 85(1): 165-177.
[10] 朱波, 彭奎, 高美荣, 等. 川中丘陵区土地利用变化的生态环境效应--以中国科学院盐亭紫色土农业生态试验站集水区为例[J]. 山地学报, 2001, 19(S1): 14-19.[ZHU B, PENG K, GAO M R, et al. Land use change and effects on eco-environment in hilly area of central Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2001, 19(S1): 14-19.]
[11] 李亚琴, 李梁, 黄蓉, 等. 川中丘陵区边坡防护林对农田土壤有机碳的影响--以盐亭县为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(3): 255-259.[LI Y Q, LI L, HUANG R, et al. Effect of shelterbelt on soil organic carbon in farmland in hilly area of central Sichuan Basin: a case study of Yanting[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2012, 28(3): 255-259.]
[12] 罗怀良, 王慧萍, 陈浩. 川中丘陵地区近25年来农田土壤有机碳密度变化--以四川省盐亭县为例[J]. 山地学报, 2010, 28(2): 212-217.[LUO H L, WANG H P, CHEN H. Change of farmland soil organic carbon density in hilly area of central Sichuan Basin in the last 25 yesrs-a case study of Yanting County, Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2010, 28(2): 212-217.]
[13] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.[YIN W Y. Soil animals of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.]
[14] 尹文英. 中国亚热带土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.[YIN W Y. Subtropical soil animals of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992.]
[15] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.[YIN W Y. Pictorical keys to soil animals of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1998.]
[16] 马克平, 刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ α多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994, 2(4): 231-239.[MA K P, LIU Y M. Measurement method of biological community diversityⅠ: Measure method of alpha diversity[J]. Chinese Biodiversity, 1994, 2(4): 231-239. (未找到本条文献英文信息, 请核对) ]
[17] FROUZ J. Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 1999, 74(1/3): 167-186.
[18] WICKINGS K, GRANDY A S. Management intensity interacts with litter chemistry and climate to drive temporal patterns in arthropod communities during decomposition[J]. Pedobiologia, 2013, 56(2): 105-112.
[19] 王永芳, 包慧娟, 海春兴, 等. 防护林对科尔沁沙地耕地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(6): 1009-1013.[WANG Y F, BAO H J, HAI C X, et al. Effects of shelter forest on soil physicochemical properties of farmland in the horqin sand land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2012, 29(6): 1009-1013.]
[20] 鲍毅新, 程宏毅, 葛宝明, 等. 不同土地利用方式下大型土壤动物群落对土壤理化性质的响应[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 30(2): 121-127.[BAO Y X, CHENG H Y, GE B M, et al. Soil macrofauna community in different using type of soils[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2007, 30(2): 121-127.]
[21] OLECHOWICZ E. Soil and litter macrofauna in shelterbelts and in adjacent croplands: changes in community structure after tree planting[J]. Polish Journal of Ecology, 2007, 55(4): 647-664.
[22] PAULI N, BARRIOS E, CONACHER A J, et al. Soil macrofauna in agricultural landscapes dominated by the Quesungual Slash-and-Mulch Agroforestry System, western Honduras[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2011, 47(2): 119-132.
[23] UNSICKER S B, BAER N, KAHMEN A, et al. Invertebrate herbivory along a gradient of plant species diversity in extensively managed grasslands[J]. Oecologia, 2006, 150(2): 233-246.
[24] 梅盛德, 赵亮. 川中丘陵区防护林水土保持能力研究[J]. 四川林勘设计, 1996(2): 24-32.[MEI S D, ZHAO L. Study on capability in water and soil conservation of sheterbelt in hilly area of central Sichuan Basin[J]. Sichuan forestry Exploration and Design, 1996(2): 24-32.]

相关文章 15

[1]	潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529-2539.
[2]	李贲, 张伟, 束潇潇, 莫英敏, 裴恩乐, 袁晓, 王天厚. 上海郊区三类典型生境的两栖类分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 824-831.
[3]	杨洋, 张玮, 潘宏博, 顾琬雯, 郝瑞娟, 熊春晖, 王丽卿. 滆湖轮虫群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 832-840.
[4]	叶学瑶, 陶敏, 朱光平, 胡林, 陈发军, 李斌. 三峡库区小江鱼类群落特征及其历史变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 841-846.
[5]	李金前, 王吉, 刘亚军, 邹锋, 马燕天, 吴兰. 水位高程变化对湿地土壤微生物代谢功能的影响研究——以蚌湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 730-737.
[6]	杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张安录. 农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付额度研究——基于选择实验法的生态外溢视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 368-375.
[7]	田凯, 汪正祥, 雷耘, 李中强, 潘磊, 李亭亭. 鄂西北六个自然保护区鱼类群落结构及多样性比较[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 384-393.
[8]	王俊, 苏巍, 杨少荣, 姜伟. 金沙江一期工程蓄水前后绥江段鱼类群落多样性特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 394-401.
[9]	胡俊, 郑金秀, 池仕运, 董方勇. 苏皖交界河网区浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子关系的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 282-288.
[10]	靳士科, 王娟娟, 朱莎, 张琪, 黎翔, 郑文静, 由文辉. 上海城区六种林地凋落物中土壤动物群落结构[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 1-8.
[11]	汤勇, 张薇, 薛俊增, 陈立婧. 长江口大洋山近岸水域浮游植物群落及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1176-1183.
[12]	李文浩, 张萌, 门吉帅, 敖雪夫, 胡新艳, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 江西仙女湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1218-1227.
[13]	刘凯, 段金荣, 徐东坡, 周彦锋, 徐跑. 怀洪新河太湖新银鱼国家级水产种质资源保护区生境及渔业群落多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 395-403.
[14]	钱红, 严云志, 储玲, 朱仁, 高俊峰, 蔡永久. 巢湖流域河流鱼类群落的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 257-264.
[15]	何勇凤, 李昊成, 王旭歌, 朱永久, 杨德国. 长湖鱼类群落结构的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 265-273.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed