长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (08): 1167-1175.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201608002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

水利旅游资源空间结构特征及自驾车可达性研究——以长江中游城市群国家水利风景区为例

马勇1,2, 童昀1   

  1. 1. 西安外国语大学旅游学院人文地理研究所, 陕西 西安 710128;
    2. 湖北大学旅游发展研究院, 湖北 武汉 430062
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-18 修回日期:2016-02-04 出版日期:2016-08-20
  • 作者简介:马勇(1959~),男,教授,博士,博导,主要研究方向为区域旅游规划.E-mail:mytcn@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省社会科学基金重大招标项目(2009087);西安外国语大学研究生科研基金重点项目(syjs201503)

A STUDY ON THE SPATIAL STRUCTURE FEATURES OF WATER CONSERVANCY TOURISM RESOURCES AND SELF-DRIVING ACCESSIBILITY——TAKING THE NATIONAL WATER CONSERVANCY SCENIC SPOTS IN CITY CLUSTERS ALONG THE MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YANGTZE RIVER AS AN EXAMPLE

MA Yong1,2, TONG Yun1   

  1. 1. School of Tourism and Research Institute of Human Geography, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an 710128, China;
    2. Academy of Tourism Department, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
  • Received:2015-11-18 Revised:2016-02-04 Online:2016-08-20
  • Supported by:
    A Major Project of Hubei Province's Social Sciences Fund (2009087);A Key Program of Xi'an International Studies University's Graduates Scientific Research Fund (syjs201503)

摘要: 以长江中游城市群60处国家水利风景区为研究对象,利用最邻近点指数、Voronoi多边形面积变异系数、核密度分析、图层叠加分析等空间分析手段和GIS空间分析工具,对区域水利旅游资源的空间结构特征进行分析。解释了水利风景区空间分布的影响因素。最后基于谷歌地图搜索测算了各水利风景区对于相应城市群地级市的交通可达性。结果表明:水利风景区呈随机、均匀分布态势,但有集聚分布倾向;空间集聚形态上表现为三处高密度集聚圈、三处低密度集聚圈、一处真空地带;水利风景区空间分布受资源禀赋、交通区位、政策支撑等多因素影响;水利风景区的通达度均值为212.15分钟,大部分水利风景区可达性并不理想;湖南各地级市到达所有水利风景区平均耗时优于江西和湖北。

关键词: 水利风景区, 空间结构, 可达性, GIS, 长江中游城市群

Abstract: By selecting altogether 60 national water conservancy scenic spots in the city clusters along the middle reaches of the Yangtze River as the research object, this paper conducted a thorough analysis on the spatial structure features of regional water conservancy tourism resources with the adoption of spatial analysis methods including the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm, Voronoi polygon area coefficient of variation, kernel density analysis and map layer overlapping analysis, and spatial analysis tools such as GIS. Moreover, the relationship between the spatial distribution of water conservancy scenic spot and factors was also explained in this dissertation. Through a detailed analysis of the aforementioned contents, this paper calculated the transport accessibility that each water conservancy scenic spot showed against its respective prefectural city on the basis of Google Earth results. It concludes that: though distributed randomly and uniformly, these water conservancy scenic spots were showing a trend of aggregated distribution; the aggregated distribution was manifested as three high-density aggregation circles, three low-density aggregation circles and one vacuum zone; the spatial distribution of scenic area of water conservancy was largely affected by its resource endowment, transport location and policy support; the average transport time from prefectural city to its corresponding water conservancy scenic spot was 212.15 minutes so that most of them showed a low level of accessibility; it took less time to travel from prefectural cities in Hunan Province to all the water conservancy scenic spots than those in Jiangxi and Hubei Province.

Key words: water conservancy scenic spot, spatial structure, accessibility, GIS, Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River

中图分类号: 

  • F224
[1] 余凤龙, 黄震方, 尚正永. 水利风景区的价值内涵、发展历程与运行现状的思考[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(12): 169-175.[YU F L, HUANG Z F, SHANG Z Y. Value connotation and development course and running status of water park[J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(12): 169-175.]
[2] 丁枢, 黄江涛. 水利旅游资源的文化内涵及开发思路[J]. 中国水利, 2009(2): 49-51.[DING S, HUANG J T. Water-related tourism resources: cultural inherent and development ideas[J]. China Water Resources, 2009(2): 49-51.]
[3] 陈海鹰, 李鹏, 李向明. 基于吸引物属性的水利旅游概念内涵解析[J]. 生态经济, 2013(11): 90-94.[CHEN H Y, LI P, LI X M. Analysis on connotation of the concept of water tourism based on attributes of the attractions[J]. Ecological Economy, 2013(11): 90-94.]
[4] 毛明海, 应丽云, 杨秀石. 浙江省水利旅游资源潜力评价[J]. 科技通报, 2002, 18(3): 213-218.[MAO M H, YING L Y, YANG X S. Evaluation of the development of water conservancy tourism resources in Zhejiang province[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2002, 18(3): 213-218.]
[5] 吴文庆, 沈涵, 吉琛佳, 等. 水利生态旅游开发潜力的评价指标体系研究[J]. 管理世界, 2012(3): 184-185.[WU W Q, SHEN H, JI C J, et al. A research on the evaluation indicator system of water conservancy eco-tourism's development potential[J]. Management World, 2012(3): 184-185.]
[6] 毛明海. 浙江省水利旅游态势分析及可持续发展研究[J]. 经济地理, 2002(S1): 312-316.[MAO M H. The situation analysis and the research on the sustainable development of Zhejiang water conservancy tourism[J]. Economic Geography, 2002(S1): 312-316.]
[7] 付景保. 河南水利风景区旅游发展战略研究[J]. 中国水利, 2010(19): 68-70.[FU J B. Strateage research of water scenic spots tourism development in Henan province[J]. China Water Resources, 2010(19): 68-70.]
[8] 李小琼. 山东省水利风景区水利旅游资源开发利用研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学硕士学位论文, 2013.[LI X Q. Study on development and utilization of water conservancy tourism resources in Shandong province water parks[D]. Qingdao: Master Dissertation of Ocean University of China, 2013.]
[9] 赵玉红, 吴向韶, 孙伟. 浅谈水利风景区的水土保持与生态环境保护——以安徽凤台县淮上明珠水利风景区为例[J]. 中国水利, 2011(19): 62-63.[ZHAO Y H, WU X S, SUN W. A study on the soil and water conservation and ecological environmental protection of scenic areas of water conservancy——illustrated by the case of the pearl on the Huaihe River scenic spot in Fengtai County, Anhui Province[J]. China Water Resources, 2011(19): 62-63.]
[10] 杨曦, 姜锋. 旅游驱动的土地利用与覆被变化对景区植被碳库的影响——以中国内蒙三盛公水利风景区为例[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 32(4): 152-159, 179.[YANG X, JIANG F. Effects of tourism land-use and land-cover change on vegetation carbon stocks of national water park of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 2015, 32(4): 152-159, 179.]
[11] 丘萍, 章仁俊. 国家级水利风景区分布及影响因素研究——基于空间自相关和固定效应模型的实证[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2009, 24(5): 47-53.[QIU P, ZHANG R J. On the influential factors and spatial distribution of national water Parks' in China——analysis based on the spatial-dependent model and the fix-effects model[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2009, 24(5): 47-53. ]
[12] 韩洁, 宋保平. 陕西省水利风景区空间分布特征分析及水利旅游空间体系构建[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(11): 166-172.[HAN J, SONG B P. Spatial distribution analysis and structure system construction of water conservancy sights in Shaanxi[J]. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(11): 166-172.]
[13] 侯松岩, 姜洪涛. 江苏省水利风景区空间结构分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2014, 33(3): 102-105.[HOU S Y, JIANG H T. Study on spatial structure of water scenic spots in Jiangsu province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2014, 33(3): 102-105.]
[14] 国家发展改革委. 国家发展改革委关于印发长江中游城市群发展规划的通知[EB/OL]. (2015-04-13). http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201504/t20150416_688229.html.[National Development and Reform Commission. Notice of the national development and Reform Commission on printing and distributing the development plan of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[EB/OL]. (2015-04-13). http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201504/t20150416_688229.html.]
[15] 徐建华. 计量地理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.[XU J H. Quantitative geography[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.]
[16] 张红, 王新生, 余瑞林. 基于Voronoi图的测度点状目标空间分布特征的方法[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 39(3): 422-426.[ZHANG H, WANG X S, YU R L. Voronoi diagram to study the spatial distribution pattern of point sets[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2005, 39(3): 422-426.]
[17] DUYCKAERTS C, GODEFROY G. Voronoi tessellation to study the numerical density and the spatial distribution of neurones[J]. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 2000, 20(1): 83-92.
[18] 刘锐, 胡伟平, 王红亮, 等. 基于核密度估计的广佛都市区路网演变分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(1): 81-86.[LIU R, HU W P, WANG H L, et al. The road network evolution of Guangzhou-Foshan metropolitan area based on kernel density estimation[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 81-86.]
[19] 李平华, 陆玉麒. 可达性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(3): 69-78.[LI P H, LU Y Q. Review and prospectation of accessibility research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2005, 24(3): 69-78.]
[20] MORRIS J M, DUMBLE P L, WIGAN M R. Accessibility indicators for transport planning[J]. Transportation Research Part A: General, 1979, 13(2): 91-109.
[21] 靳诚, 陆玉麒, 张莉, 等. 基于路网结构的旅游景点可达性分析——以南京市区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 246-258.[JIN C, LU Y Q, ZHANG L, et al. An analysis of accessibility of scenic spots based on land traffic network: a case study of Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(1): 246-258.]
[22] 潘竟虎, 从忆波. 中国4A级及以上旅游景点(区)空间可达性测度[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(11): 1321-1327.[PAN J H, CONG Y B. Spatial accessibility of scenic spot at 4A level and above in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(11): 1321-1327.]
[23] 李一曼, 修春亮. 浙江省陆路交通可达性与经济社会协调性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(6): 751-758.[LI Y M, XIU C L. Analyzing the relationship between accessibility of land transport and social economy in Zhejiang province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(6): 751-758.]
[24] 曹芳东, 黄震方, 吴江, 等. 国家级风景名胜区旅游效率测度与区位可达性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1686-1697.[CAO F D, HUANG Z F, WU J, et al. The relationship between tourism efficiency measure and location accessibility of Chinese national scenic areas[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1686-1697.]
[25] 李巍, 王祖静. 基于路网结构的甘南藏族自治州旅游资源可达性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(5): 644-651.[LI W, WANG Z J. Study on accessibility of tourism resources of Gannan state based on land traffic network[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(5): 644-651.]
[26] 李乐乐, 白建军, 宋冰洁. 西安市交通网络综合通达性研究[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(5): 88-93.[LI L L, BAI J J, SONG B J. A study of comprehensive accessibility of Xi'an transport networks[J]. Human Geography, 2014, 29(5): 88-93.]
[1] 王宇环, 靳 诚, 安鸿波, 刘 月. 基于低碳出行方式的南京市本地居民景点可达性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2443-2452.
[2] 阎福礼, 邹艺昭, 王世新, 周艺, 朱金峰. 中国不同交通模式的可达性空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 806-815.
[3] 姜磊, 周海峰, 柏玲. 长江中游城市群经济-城市-社会-环境耦合度空间差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 649-656.
[4] 陈优良, 陶天慧, 丁鹏. 长江三角洲城市群空气质量时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 687-697.
[5] 梅琳, 黄柏石, 敖荣军, 张涛. 长江中游城市群城市职能结构演变及其动力因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 481-489.
[6] 刘钢, 宋亚倩, 樊力硕, 汪志强. 基于有序Logistic回归的水库移民住房感知实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 519-529.
[7] 周志高, 林爱文, 王伦澈. 长江中游城市群太阳辐射长期变化特征及其与气象要素的关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 563-571.
[8] 李沁, 沈明, 高永年, 张志飞. 基于改进粒子群算法和元胞自动机的城市扩张模拟——以南京为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 190-197.
[9] 田柳, 陈江龙, 高金龙. 城市空间结构紧凑与土地利用效率耦合分析——以南京市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 26-34.
[10] 戴刘冬, 周锐, 张凤娥, 王新军. 城市土地利用对居民通勤碳排放的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 68-77.
[11] 钟业喜, 傅钰, 冯兴华. 基于铁路客运的中国城市可达性及类型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1645-1653.
[12] 张雅杰, 马明, 许刚. 长江中游城市群经济与生态成本空间演化模式分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1679-1686.
[13] 谢莹, 匡鸿海, 吴晶晶, 程玉丝. 基于CLUE-S模型的重庆市渝北区土地利用变化动态模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1729-1737.
[14] 刘金珍, 樊皓, 阮娅. 乌东德水库坝前段消落带生态类型划分及生态修复模式初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1767-1773.
[15] 傅钰, 钟业喜, 冯兴华. 长江经济带陆路交通可达性格局演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1484-1491.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[4] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[5] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[6] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[7] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[8] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[9] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .