长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (05): 743-750.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201605007

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

巢湖流域土地景观格局变化及生态风险驱动力研究

黄木易, 何翔   

  1. 安徽建筑大学环境与能源工程学院, 安徽 合肥 230601
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-20 修回日期:2015-12-31 出版日期:2016-05-20
  • 作者简介:黄木易(1978~),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为土地管理、规划及3S技术应用.E-mail:huangyang78@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校省级优秀青年人才基金重点项目"基于流域尺度景观格局与水污染效应耦合机制及模型研究"(2013SQRL047ZD);安徽省财政、住建厅徽派建筑保护省级专项"新型城镇化过程中徽州古村落地域文脉保护模式及路径研究"(HPZX2013-01)

STUDY ON LANDSCAPE PATTERN CHANGES AND DRIVING FORCES OF ECOLOGICAL RISK IN CHAOHU LAKE BASIN

HUANG Mu-yi, HE Xiang   

  1. School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
  • Received:2015-08-20 Revised:2015-12-31 Online:2016-05-20
  • Supported by:
    The KeyProject of Excellent Researcher Award Program from Anhui Institute of Education. "Study of modeling and coupling mechanism betweenlandscape pattern and water pollution effect based on watershed scale (2013SQRL047ZD)";The Provincial Special Issue on Huizhou ArchitecturalProtection from Anhui Provincial Department of Finance, Department of Housing and Construction."Study on the path and pattern of protectionfor the regional context of Huizhou ancient village during the stage of new urbanization (HPZX2013-01)"

摘要: 健康的流域生态系统是区域经济社会可持续发展的重要基础。探讨流域土地景观格局变化及生态风险驱动机制有助于生态系统状况诊断与风险来源认识,为有效制定生态风险管控措施提供决策依据。应用空间信息技术平台及计量分析方法,探讨了基于县域行政单元的快速城市化阶段巢湖流域土地景观格局变化及生态风险驱动力。研究表明:(1)2000~2013年,巢湖流域土地景观类型变化表现出农地、林地、水体景观面积下降,建设用地景观面积显著增加的趋势;流域景观水平上多样性和均匀度呈下降、优势度呈上升趋势,景观空间异质性下降; (2)近15 a来,巢湖流域9个行政单元内生态风险均呈上升趋势,生态风险整体恶化,需加强对流域生态风险上升的管控; (3)生态风险驱动力分析表明,快速城市化阶段巢湖流域生态风险的主要驱动因子为第二产业值、城市化率、人口密度和固定资产投资,而人均GDP的增加在一定程度上会降低生态风险水平。

关键词: 土地景观格局, 生态风险, 驱动机制, 巢湖流域

Abstract: Healthy ecosystem is an important foundation for the sustainable development of regional social economy. Studying the changes of landscape pattern and the driving forces of ecological risk is helpful to diagnose the ecosystem status and reveal the source of ecological risk, which can provide a basis for taking measures to manage and control the changes of ecological risk in Chaohu Lake Basin. In this paper, the changes of landscape pattern and ecological risk of 9 administrative units in Chaohu Lake Basin were analyzed based on spatial information technology, and the driving forces of ecological risk were discussed by using econometric analysis model during the phase of rapid urbanization from 2000 to 2013 in Chaohu Lake Basin. The results showed that:(1) The landscape structure changed obviously from 2000 to 2013 in Chaohu Lake Basin, the farmland, woodland and water landscape decreased gradually, but the construction land increased significantly. On the landscape level, the Shannon's diversity index and Evenness index decreased, but the Dominance index increased, which presented the reduce of regional landscape heterogeneity remarkably. (2) As a whole, the ecological risk of the nine administrative units in Chaohu Lake Basin was on the rise, the overall elevation of ecological risk means that the regional ecosystem experienced strong disturbance from human activities. Therefore, measures should be taken to control the rising of regional ecological risk in Chaohu Lake Basin. (3) The driving force analysis of ecological risk indicated that the changes of ecological risk during the rapid urbanization stage in Chaohu Lake Basin were mainly affected by second industrial value, urbanization rate, population density and fixed asset investment, and the increase of per capita GDP would reduce the level of ecological risk to some extent.

Key words: landscape pattern, ecological risk, driving forces, Chaohu Lake Basin

中图分类号: 

  • Q149
[1] 付在毅, 许学工, 林辉平, 等. 辽河三角洲湿地区域生态风险评价[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(3):365-373. [FU Z Y, XU X G, LIN H P, et al. Regional ecological risk assessment of in the Liaohe River Delta wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(3):365-373.]
[2] 胡和兵, 刘红玉, 郝敬锋, 等. 流域景观结构的城市化影响与生态风险评价[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(12):3432-3440. [HU H B, LIU H Y, HAO J F, et al. The urbanization effects on watershed landscape structure and their ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(12):3432-3440.]
[3] 王娟, 崔保山, 刘杰, 等. 云南澜沧江流域土地利用及其变化对景观生态风险的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(2):269-277. [WANG J, CUI B S, LIU J, et al. The effect of land use and its change on ecological risk in the Lancang River watershed of Yunnan province at the landscape scale[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 28(2):269-277.]
[4] 曾辉, 刘国军. 基于景观结构的区域生态风险分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 1999, 19(5):454-457. [ZENG H, LIU G J. Analysis of regional ecological risk based on landscape structure[J]. China Environmental Science, 1999, 19(5):454-457.]
[5] CHEN L D, TIAN H Y, FU B J, et al. Development of a new index for integrating landscape patterns with ecological processes at watershed scale[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2009, 19(1):37-45.
[6] 高永年, 高俊峰, 许妍. 太湖流域水生态功能区土地利用变化的景观生态风险效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(7):1088-1096. [GAO Y N, GAO J F, XU Y. Response of landscape ecological risk to land use change in level I aquatic eco-functional regions in Taihu lake watershed[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(7):1088-1096.]
[7] 张学斌, 石培基, 罗君, 等. 基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析-以石羊河流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3):410-419. [ZHANG X B, SHI P J, LUO J, et al. The ecological risk assessment of arid inland River Basin at the landscape scale:A case study on Shiyang river basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(3):410-419.]
[8] 孙广友, 田卫, 贾志国, 等. 松原灌区建设对查干湖生态风险分析及对策[J]. 湖泊科学, 2014, 26(1):66-73. [SUN G Y, TIAN W, JIA Z G, et al. Risk analysis and mitigation on the impact of the development of Songyuan irrigation area on the ecology of Lake Chagan[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2014, 26(1):66-73.]
[9] 李继洲, 吴海旭, 姜万, 等. 南京城区黑臭河道底泥污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11):1913-1919. [LI J Z, WU H X, JIANG W, et al. Pollution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of sediment from malodorous rivers in Nanjing city[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(11):1913-1919.]
[10] 刘成, 邵世光, 范成新, 等. 巢湖重污染汇流湾区沉积物重金属污染特征及风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014, 34(4):1031-1037. [LIU C, SHAO S G, FAN C X, et al. Pollution status and risk assessment of heavy metal in the sediment of the severe polluted confluence area of Lake Chaohu[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014, 34(4):1031-1037.]
[11] 刘世梁, 刘琦, 张兆苓, 等. 云南省红河流域景观生态风险及驱动力分析[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13):3728-3734. [LIU S L, LIU Q, ZHANG Z L, et al. Landscape ecological risk and driving force analysis in Red river basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13):3728-3734.]
[12] YORK R, ROSA E A, DIETZ T. Bridging environmental science with environmental policy:plasticity of population, affluence, and technology[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2002, 83(1):18-34.
[13] YORK R, ROSA E A, DIETZ T. STIRPAT, IPAT and IMPACT:analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3):351-365.
[14] 王立猛, 何康林. 基于STIRPAT模型的环境压力空间差异分析-以能源消费为例[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(5):1032-1037. [WANG L M, HE K L. Analysis of spatial variations in environmental impact based on the STIRPAT model-A case study of energy consumption[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 28(5):1032-1037.]
[15] LIDDLE B, LUNG S. Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries:revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts[J]. Population and Environment, 2010, 31(5):317-343.
[16] 陈肖飞, 姚士谋, 张落成. 1990年以来长江三角洲耕地资源变化及驱动因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(9):1521-1527. [CHEN X F, YAO S M, ZHANG L C. Analysis of cropland resource changes and driving factors in Yangtze river delta from 1990 to 2012[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(9):1521-1527.]
[17] 徐强, 陈来. 巢湖流域生态承载力定量评价研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2010(6):52-55. [XU Q, CHEN L. Quantitative evaluation of ecological carrying capacity of Chaohu Lake Basin[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2010(6):52-55.]
[18] 王传辉, 郭振亚, 高超, 等. 基于遥感的巢湖流域景观格局变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(12):1586-1592. [WANG C H, GUO Z Y, GAO C, et al. Changes of landscape pattern in the Chaohu Lake Basin based on remote sensing[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2013, 22(12):1586-1592.]
[19] 李云生, 周广金, 梁涛, 等. 巢湖流域的土地利用变化及其生态系统功能损益[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(6):1656-1664. [LI Y S, ZHOU G J, LIANG T, et al. Study of land use change on the gains and losses of ecosystem service function values of Chaohu Lake Basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(6):1656-1664.]
[20] 阎伍玖, 王心源. 巢湖流域非点源污染初步研究[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(3):263-267. [YAN W J, WANG X Y. Preliminary study on non-point sources pollution in the Chaohu Lake drainage basin[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1998, 18(3):263-267.]
[21] 苏海民, 何爱霞. 基于RS和地统计学的福州市土地利用分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1):91-99. [SU H M, HE A X. Analysis of land use based on RS and geostatistics in Fuzhou city[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1):91-99.]
[22] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明, 等. 景观生态学原理及应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2001:58. [FU B J, CHEN L D, MA K M, et al. Principle and application of landscape ecology[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2001:58.]
[23] 史培军, 江源, 王静爱. 土地利用/覆盖变化与生态安全响应机制[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2003:5-6. [SHI P J, JIANG Y, WANG J A. Land use/cover change and ecosystem security[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2003:5-6.]
[24] 陈鹏, 潘晓玲. 干旱区内陆流域区域景观生态风险分析-以阜康三工河流域为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(4):116-120. [CHEN P, PAN X L. Ecological risk analysis of regional landscape in inland river watershed of arid area-a case study of Sangong River Basin in Fukang[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2003, 22(4):116-120.]
[25] 李晓燕, 张树文. 基于景观结构的吉林西部生态安全动态分析-景观空间方法与应用[J]. 干旱区研究, 2005, 22(1):57-62. [LI X Y, ZHANG S W. Analysis on the dynamic trend of ecological security in the west part of Jilin province, China based on the landscape structure[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2005, 22(1):57-62.]
[26] 王云, 周忠学, 郭钟哲. 都市农业景观破碎化过程对生态系统服务价值的影响-以西安市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(6):1097-1105. [WANG Y, ZHOU Z X, GUO Z Z. Impact of the urban agricultural landscape fragmentation on ecosystem services:A case study of Xi'an city[J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(6):1097-1105.]
[27] 王兮之, 郑影华, 李森. 海南岛西部土地利用变化及其景观格局动态分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2006, 26(3):409-414. [WANG X Z, ZHENG Y H, LI S. Analysis of land use and landscape pattern change in west of Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2006, 26(3):409-414.]
[28] 叶笃正, 符淙斌. 全球变化的主要科学问题[J]. 大气科学, 1994, 18(4):498-512. [YE D Z, FU C B. Major issues of global change sciences[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospherica Sinica, 1994, 18(4):498-512.]
[29] 向英奇, 刘淼, 胡远满, 等. 辽宁省沿海地区景观格局时空变化及其驱动力[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(9):2628-2635. [XIANG Y Q, LIU M, HU Y M, et al. Spatial and temporal change of landscape pattern and its driving force in Liaoning coastal regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(9):2628-2635.]
[30] CHERTOW M R. The IPAT equation and its variants:changing views of technology and environmental impact[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2000, 4(4):13-29.
[1] 高金龙, 陈雯. 转型期中国城市用地结构动态演变及其机理——基于长三角51个样本城市的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 540-551.
[2] 李杨, 李海东, 施卫省, 何俊德, 胡亚文. 基于神经网络的土壤重金属预测及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 591-597.
[3] 潘竟虎, 张建辉. 中国县域人均粮食占有量的时空差异及驱动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 410-418.
[4] 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 陈翼翔, 张媛. 区域洪涝灾害恢复力时空演变研究——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1384-1394.
[5] 荆锐, 陈江龙, 田柳. 国家级新区发展异质性及驱动机制研究——以上海浦东新区和南京江北新区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 859-867.
[6] 钱红, 严云志, 储玲, 朱仁, 高俊峰, 蔡永久. 巢湖流域河流鱼类群落的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 257-264.
[7] 陈春丽, 戴星照, 曾桐辉, 弓晓峰, 刘春英, 左燕君. 城市内湖表层沉积物中有机氯农药残留特征及风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2076-2084.
[8] 李继洲, 吴海旭, 姜万, 袁旭音, 刘斌武. 南京城区黑臭河道底泥污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1913-1919.
[9] 孙鸿鹄, 程先富, 戴梦琴, 王祥, 康海迪. 基于DEMATEL的区域洪涝灾害恢复力影响因素及评价指标体系研究——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1577-1583.
[10] 程先富, 戴梦琴, 郝丹丹, 吴庆双. 基于情景分析的区域洪涝灾害风险评价——以巢湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1418-1424.
[11] 赵源, 黄成敏. 基于RRM的市级土地利用总体规划生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1102-1109.
[12] 蒋豫, 刘新, 高俊峰, 蔡永久. 江苏省浅水湖泊表层沉积物中重金属污染特征及其风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1157-1162.
[13] 吕刚,王利兵,刘军,李淑芬. 全氟辛烷磺酰基化合物水生生态风险和人体健康风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(6): 904-904.
[14] 汤莉莉,牛生杰,徐建强,谢学俭,杨雪贞,晏 培. 外秦淮河疏浚后底泥重金属污染与潜在生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 424-424.
[15] 胡贤辉,张 霞,杨钢桥. 湖北省土地利用结构变化及其驱动机制分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 43-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 胡学玉, 孙宏发, 陈德林. 铜绿山矿冶废弃地优势植物重金属的积累与迁移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 436 .
[3] 宋述军,周万村. 岷江流域土地利用结构对地表水水质的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 712 .
[4] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[5] 王学雷,蔡述明,任宪友,陈世俭. 三峡库区湿地生态建设与保护利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 149 -153 .
[6] 尹占娥,许世远. 上海浦东新区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 430 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 段七零. 我国原油流动的空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 573 .
[9] 张 健, 濮励杰, 彭补拙. 基于景观生态学的区域土地利用结构变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 578 .
[10] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .