长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (04): 638-644.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201604014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带碳排放现状及未来碳减排

黄国华1,2, 刘传江1, 赵晓梦1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学经济发展研究中心, 湖北 武汉 430072;
    2. 东华理工大学经济与管理学院, 江西 抚州 344000
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-06 修回日期:2015-08-18 出版日期:2016-04-20
  • 作者简介:黄国华(1981~),男,博士研究生,主要从事经济可持续发展研究.E-mail:ghhuang@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(11JJD790031)

STATUS QUO OF CARBON EMISSION AND FUTURE CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION FOR THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC ZONE

HUANG Guo-hua1,2, LIU Chuan-jiang1, ZHAO Xiao-meng1   

  1. 1. Economic Development Research Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
    2. Economics and Management School of East China Institute of Technology, Fuzhou 344000, China
  • Received:2015-07-06 Revised:2015-08-18 Online:2016-04-20
  • Supported by:
    the Major Project of the Ministry of Education's Humanities and Social Science Key Research Base(11JJD790031)

摘要: 长江经济带是我国“三大支撑带”之一,其碳减排目标实现对我国生态文明建设具有重要意义。采用2005~2013年长江经济带(含9省2市)的能源消耗与经济社会数据,通过数理统计,得出各地历年碳排放量、人均碳排放、能源强度、产业结构多元水平的具体数值及变化率,结合运用弹性计算和矩阵分类法,发现长江经济带碳排放存在空间与结构差异。研究结果显示:(1)长江经济带碳排放及增长率、人均碳排放及增长率、能源强度都高于全国平均水平,能源强度下降率低于全国平均水平;把长江经济带分为东中西三段区域,碳排放总量、人均碳排放及能源强度下降率梯度下降,碳排放增长率、人均碳排放增长率、能源强度梯度上升。(2)工业化开始越早、重工业化主导向生产性服务业主导转变越快、越充分地区,经济低碳化水平越高;通过提升产业结构多元化速度有利于碳减排。(3)长江经济带各地实现碳减排措施应有不同,东段地区应着重降低人均碳排放,中西段地区应着重于降低能源强度。(4)未来碳减排应兼顾公平与效率,各地区碳减排目标分配应结合各地支付能力、碳汇能力、生产效率、能源结构等因素来安排。

关键词: 长江经济带, 能源强度, 碳减排, 产业结构多元化演进水平

Abstract: The Yangtze River Economic Zone is one of three pillars of China's economy. The successful implementation of carbon emission reduction in the Yangtze River Economic Zone is important to the construction of ecological civilization in China. In this paper we used social and economic data and data of energy consumption in the Yangtze River Economic Zone (including 9 provinces and 2 municipalities) during 2005-2013, and statistical analyses to quantify carbon emission, per capita carbon emission, energy intensity, evolution of industrial structure diversification degrees and the their rate of change. By using the elastic computing and matrix classification methods, we quantified the spatial and structural differences in carbon emission of the Yangtze River Economic Zone. The results showed that: (1) Yangtze River Economic Zone's carbon emission and its growth rate, per capita carbon emission and its growth rate, and energy intensity were all higher than the national average level. While the rate of reduction in energy intensity was lower than the national average level. If we divide the Yangtze River Economic Zone into eastern, middle and western regions, the total amount of carbon emission, per capita carbon emission and energy intensity rate all declined in gradients; while the growth rate of carbon emission, the growth rate of per capita carbon emission and energy intensity all increased in gradients. (2) The regions that began industrialization earlier, and were transformed from heavy-industry-oriented to service-industry-oriented faster and more fully, will have higher level of low-carbon economy. Increase in the speed of industrial structure diversification degree is positive to the carbon emission reduction. (3) Different regions of the Yangtze River Economic Zone should use different measures to achieve carbon emission reduction targets. The eastern region should focus on reducing carbon emission per capita, the middle region and the western region should focus on reducing energy intensity. (4) Future carbon emissions reduction measures should focus on both fairness and efficiency, and the targets of carbon emission reduction should be allocated in accordance with financial capability of each region, carbon sink capacity, production efficiency, energy structure and other factors.

Key words: Yangtze River Economic Belt, Low Carbon Economy, Carbon Emission Reduction, Evolution of industrial structure diversification degree

中图分类号: 

  • F205
[1] KAWASE R, MATSUOKA Y, FUJINO J. Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission in long-term climate stabilization scenarios[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(15): 2113-2122.
[2] MCCOLLUM D, YANG C. Achieving deep reductions in US transport greenhouse gas emissions: scenario analysis and policy implications[J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(12): 5580-5596.
[3] 樊纲, 苏铭, 曹静. 最终消费与碳减排责任的经济学分析[J]. 经济研究, 2010(1): 4-14, 64. [FAN G, SU M, CAO J. An economic analysis of consumption and carbon emission responsibility[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010(1): 4-14, 64.]
[4] 林伯强, 姚昕, 刘希颖. 节能和碳排放约束下的中国能源结构战略调整[J]. 中国社会科学, 2010(1): 58-71. [LIN B Q, YAO X, LIU X Y. The strategic adjustment of china's energy use structure in the context of energy-saving and carbon emission-reducing initiatives[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2010(1): 58-71.]
[5] 郭义强, 郑景云, 葛全胜. 一次能源消费导致的二氧化碳排放量变化[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1036. [GUO Y Q, ZHENG J Y, GE Q S. Study on the primary energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in China[J]. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(6): 1027-1036.]
[6] 王俊松, 贺灿飞. 能源消费、经济增长与中国CO2排放量变化——基于LMDI方法的分解分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(1): 18-23. [WANG J S, HE C F. Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission in china-analysis based on Logrithm Mean Divisa Decompusure method[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2010, 19(1): 18-23.]
[7] 2050中国能源和碳排放研究课题组. 2050中国能源和碳排放报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[8] 林毅夫. 解读中国经济[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
[9] 马相东, 王跃生. "环境库兹涅茨曲线"拐点到来了么[N]. 人民日报, 2012-10-18.
[10] STERN D I. Progress on the environmental Kuznets curve?[J]. Environment and Development Economics, 1998, 3(2): 173-196.
[11] 宋德勇, 卢忠宝. 中国低碳发展: 理论、路径与政策[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2015.
[1] 刘云强, 权 泉, 朱佳玲, 王 芳. 绿色技术创新、产业集聚与生态效率——以长江经济带城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2395-2406.
[2] 王丰龙, 曾刚, 叶琴, 陈弘挺. 基于创新合作联系的城市网络格局分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 797-805.
[3] 张华明, 王瑜鑫, 张聪聪. 中国省域能源强度趋同俱乐部存在性及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 657-666.
[4] 武晓静, 杜德斌, 肖刚, 管明明. 长江经济带城市创新能力差异的时空格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 490-499.
[5] 成定平, 淦苏美. 长江经济带高技术产业投入产出效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 325-332.
[6] 徐小任, 徐勇. 长江经济带后备适宜建设用地潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1789-1796.
[7] 李嬛, 宁越敏, 魏也华, 陈斐然. 长江经济带沿江城市群空间分布格局与联动机理研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1797-1806.
[8] 郭庆宾, 刘琪, 张冰倩. 环境规制是否抑制了国际R&D溢出效应——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1807-1814.
[9] 刘传江, 赵晓梦. 长江经济带全要素碳生产率的时空演化及提升潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1635-1644.
[10] 刘玮辰, 陆玉麒, 文玉钊. 长江经济带城市对外服务能力时空演变分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1475-1483.
[11] 傅钰, 钟业喜, 冯兴华. 长江经济带陆路交通可达性格局演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1484-1491.
[12] 任俊霖, 李浩, 伍新木, 李雪松. 基于主成分分析法的长江经济带省会城市水生态文明评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1537-1544.
[13] 宓泽锋, 曾刚, 尚勇敏, 陈弘挺, 朱菲菲, 陈斐然. 长江经济带市域生态文明建设现状及发展潜力初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1438-1447.
[14] 丁军, 黄茹, 吕拉昌. 基于专利授权数的长江经济带创新差异的多尺度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 868-876.
[15] 张宇, 曹卫东, 梁双波, 胡燕燕. 长江经济带城镇化协同演化时空格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 715-724.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋玉芝,秦伯强, 高光. 附着生物对富营养化水体氮磷的去除效果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 180 .
[2] 刘滨谊,刘 琴. 服务于城市旅游形象的景观规划——以南京市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 164 -168 .
[3] 梁常德,龙天渝,李继承,刘腊美. 三峡库区非点源氮磷负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 26 -30 .
[4] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 吴丰林,周德民,胡金明. 基于景观格局演变的城市湿地景观生态规划途径[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 368 .
[7] 屈 璠,刘 敏,侯立军,许世远,刘巧梅,欧冬妮. 潮汐循环影响下上覆水环境因子和氮营养盐的变化及其相关关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 345 .
[8] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[9] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[10] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .